Surgical Approaches to Advanced Knee OA (TKA, UKA, Osteotomy)

Author(s):  
Adam S. Olsen ◽  
Vivek M. Shah
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
pp. 63-69
Author(s):  
George Chang Chien

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive joint disease associated with both mechanical and biologic abnormalities of the articular cartilage and subchondral bone. In normal cartilage, a delicate balance exists between matrix synthesis and degradation; in OA, however, cartilage degradation exceeds synthesis. Treatment modalities include nonpharmacological, pharmacological, and surgical approaches. Intrarticular platelet rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as promising treatment for early stages of knee OA. PRP is an autologous blood product defined as a volume of plasma that has a supraphysiologic platelet count. PRP can accelerate the physiological recovery process, relieve pain, and contains anti-inflammatory and anti-bacterial activity. Although the mechanisms for these complex interactions are not completely understood, they are attributed to the more than 30 bioactive proteins contained in the alpha granules of platelets including growth factors and proteins, such as fibrin, fibronectin, vitronectin and thrombospondin. Several studies now have demonstrated that intraarticular PRP injections are safe and effective treatment to reduce pain and improve quality of life through increased function in knee OA. The available literature suggests that PRP is a better option than hyaluronic acid for many knee OA patients. We identified 12 comparative studies that demonstrated superiority of PRP as compared to hyaluronic acid for knee OA. Considering what is known about the deleterious effects of local anesthetic and corticosteroids on soft tissue health, it may be time for a shift in the knee OA treatment algorithm to favor early intervention for regenerative therapies including platelet rich plasma. Key words: Platelet rich plasma, hyaluronic acid, knee pain, knee osteoarthritis, arthritis, chondrotoxicity


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-198
Author(s):  
A. O. Ginoyan ◽  
T. B. Minasov ◽  
R. F. Khairutdinov ◽  
E. R. Yakupova ◽  
E. I. Mukhametzyanova ◽  
...  

Introduction. Hip and knee arthroplasty are the two of the most frequently used methods of surgical treatment. The techniques of drug support in the perioperative period, as well as the rehabilitation component, are of primary importance. However, due to the increase in number of operations the number of complications is also growing. At the same time, surgical approaches to the treatment of bilateral knee OA are still not sufficiently studied. The literature describes intervals between arthroplasty operations on knee joints from 3 months to 5 years. The epidemiological and pathogenetic aspects of functional recovery in bilateral knee OA patients are also in need of further research.Materials and methods. Authors analysed outcomes in 124 patients with gonarthrosis treated with arthroplasty. 32 patients underwent arthroplasty of the contralateral joint. The outcomes were evaluated with the KSS score and X-ray imaging at 1, 3 and 6 months postop.Results and discussions. In the first month after the operation functional recovery was noted due to the relief of pain, recovery of the muscle tone and regional hemodynamics in the area of the knee joint. It was also noted that the recovery of function in the period from month 1 to month 3 in patients with bilateral gonarthrosis occurs less intensively due to decompensation of the contralateral joint.Conclusion. The study demonstrates the recovery of function in patients in the postoperative period. There is, however, the issue of functional decompensation in the opposite limb, which in turn reduces the effectiveness of motor rehabilitation and leads to the need for endoprosthetic replacement of the second joint.


1993 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Y. Wen ◽  
Roberto C. Heros

2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (17) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
BRUCE JANCIN
Keyword(s):  

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bartanusz ◽  
Porchet

The treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression is complex. The three treatment modalities that are currently applied (in a histologically non-specific manner) are surgery, radiotherapy and the administration of steroids. The development of new spinal instrumentations and surgical approaches considerably changed the extent of therapeutic options in this field. These new surgical techniques have made it possible to resect these tumours totally, with subsequent vertebral reconstruction and spinal stabilization. In this respect, it is important to clearly identify those patients who can benefit from such an extensive surgery. We present our management algorithm to help select patients for surgery and at the same time identifying those for whom primary non-surgical therapy would be indicated. The retrospective review of surgically treated patients in our department in the last four years reveals a meagre application of conventional guidelines for the selection of the appropriate operative approach in the surgical management of these patients. The reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.


2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (17) ◽  
pp. 40-41
Author(s):  
MITCHEL L. ZOLER
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (19) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
MITCHEL L. ZOLER
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document