Venous Sinus Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Author(s):  
Abigail P. McCallum ◽  
Dale Ding
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 382
Author(s):  
Dinesh Ramanathan ◽  
Zachary D. Travis ◽  
Emmanuel Omosor ◽  
Taylor Wilson ◽  
Nikhil Sahasrabudhe ◽  
...  

We describe a case of severe headaches, double vision, and progressive vision loss secondary to a ruptured intracranial cyst (IAC) in a 31-year-old woman with no relevant past medical history. The case is peculiar because drainage of the subdural hygroma led to a minimal improvement in vision with persistent elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). Further exploration revealed transverse sinus stenosis necessitating stenting. Evaluation post-stenting showed marked reduction of ICP and improvement in symptoms. This report underscores the importance of comprehensive work-up and suspicion of multiple underlying etiologies that may be crucial to complete resolution of presenting symptoms in some cases. We provide an overview of the clinical indications and evidence for venous sinus stenting in treating idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH).


Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 508
Author(s):  
Robert K. Townsend ◽  
Kyle M. Fargen

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a debilitating condition that has traditionally been difficult to treat. In recent years, there has been increasing focus on the role of intracranial venous hypertension in the pathophysiology of IIH. Based on increased understanding of this pathophysiology, venous sinus stenting (VSS) has emerged as a safe and reliable treatment for a certain population of patients with IIH. Stratifying patients with IIH based on the status of their venous outflow can provide insight into which patients may enjoy reduction in their symptoms after VSS and provides information regarding why some patients may have symptom recurrence. The traditional view of IIH as a disease due to obesity in young women has been cast into doubt as the understanding of the role of intracranial venous hypertension has improved.


Author(s):  
Yazan Radaideh

Introduction : Although venous sinus stenting is an established treatment for medically refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension, a subset of patients shows little or no improvement of symptoms after stenting. While this could be related to a number of factors, failure to sufficiently address the pressure gradient is one that can be recognized during the treatment procedure. We describe two patients who had a persistent venous pressure gradient after stent placement. Once identified, a second stent was placed with subsequent resolution of the pressure gradient. Methods : This retrospective chart review identified patients at a single institution who underwent venous sinus stenting and required immediate placement of a second venous sinus stent for a persistent pressure gradient. Results : Two patients with refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension underwent cerebral angiography with venous manometry. In the first patient, unilateral venous sinus stenosis was present with a maximum pressure of 50 mmHg, which only decreased to 30 mmHg after placement of a right transverse‐sigmoid sinus stent. Subsequent manometry revealed a persistent gradient between the superior sagittal sinus and the right transverse sinus, which resolved after placement of a second stent in this location. In the second patient, bilateral stenosis was observed at the transverse‐sigmoid sinus junction; the maximum venous pressure was 40 mmHg, and a gradient of 30 mmHg was measured at the right transverse‐sigmoid junction, where a venous sinus stent was placed. Venous sinus pressure measurements performed immediately after the stent placement demonstrated a persistent pressure gradient of 20 mmHg in the contralateral transverse‐sigmoid sinus junction, which resolved after contralateral stent placement. Both patients showed sustained improvement in their symptoms at 1 year follow up. Conclusions : In some patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and venous sinus stenosis, a single stent may not sufficiently reduce the pressure gradient. A second stent may be required; however, this is only detectable with post‐stent pressure measurements. Performing manometry after stent placement should be routinely performed in order to detect persistent venous pressure gradient.


2020 ◽  
pp. 159101992097623
Author(s):  
Justin Schwarz ◽  
Ali Al Balushi ◽  
Sri Sundararajan ◽  
Marc Dinkin ◽  
Cristiano Oliveira ◽  
...  

Background Venous sinus stenting (VSS) is an accepted and minimally invasive treatment for adult idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) associated with lateral sinus stenosis (LSS). The efficacy and safety of venous sinus stenting (VSS) in children with IIH has not been established. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of IIH patients 18 years of age or younger with LSS treated with VSS at our institution. Included patients have fulminant disease course or are refractory or intolerant to medical management. Results Eight patients were identified; 4 males and 4 females. Mean age is 13.4 years (range 4–18). All patients had severe headaches, 5 had blurred vision, 3 had diplopia and 3 had pulsatile tinnitus. Papilledema was present in 4 patients. Three patients had prior surgical procedures. Four patients were intolerant to medical management, 3 were refractory and 1 had fulminant course. Cerebral venography demonstrated severe stenosis of the dominant sinus in 6 patients and of bilateral co-dominant sinuses in 2 patients. Six patients had intrinsic stenosis and 2 had extrinsic stenosis. Venous sinus stenting (VSS) resulted in improvement of symptoms, papilledema and normalization of CSF opening pressure in 7 patients. No immediate complications were observed. Mean follow-up period is 21 months (range 6–42). Two patients required re-stenting; one responded well and the other had persistent symptoms and underwent subsequent surgical procedures of CSF diversion, suboccipital decompression and duraplasty which were also ineffective. Conclusion VSS may provide a viable option for pediatric IIH patients who are intolerant to medication, have failed conservative management or prior surgical interventions, or present with fulminant disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 401-405
Author(s):  
Wesley Chan ◽  
A. Laine Green ◽  
Anuradha Mishra ◽  
Charles Maxner ◽  
Jai J.S. Shankar

Author(s):  
Jan Vargas ◽  
Raymond D. Turner ◽  
Aquilla S. Turk ◽  
Alejandro M. Spiotta ◽  
Jonathan Lena ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document