A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Power, Organisational Issues in Judicature and the Administration of Courts

Author(s):  
Zoltán Fleck
2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Jacob

AbstractThe present paper reviews some conclusions deriving from a series of works by a historian of medieval Western law and justice who has applied comparative analysis to the Chinese world. It points to the distance between the two civilizations, in terms of the concept of a “debt of justice” owed by the state, the autonomy of the judicial power, and judicial ethics. It opens a debate on the cultural elements that define the judicial truth-making process in various legal systems.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 23-33
Author(s):  
Dilshod P. Komolov ◽  

This article covers, based on a wide range of historical sources and a comparative analysis of legaldocuments, limited military courts in the Uzbek SSR after the end of the Second World War and the strengthening of the powers of courts of general jurisdiction, the election of judges, the national composition and professional potential of personnel, the position of educational institutions of training lawyers. It also considers repressions against scientists and cultural figures, the beginning of the rehabilitation process after Stalin's death, the gradual limitation and abolition of the powers of special courts, the strengthening of the judicial power of the union republics


Author(s):  
Luís Rodríguez Ramos

El presente trabajo analiza la responsabilidad patrimonial del Estado juez establecida en el art. 121 CE. En él se describen los precedentes históricos de este artículo 121 de la CE, su posterior desarrollo legislativo, la interpretación jurisprudencial de dichas normas, que se considera reductora y palmariamente inconstitucional desde la perspectiva sistemática del conjunto que forman los artículos 17, 24 y los citados 106.2 y 121 de la CE; finalmente se comparan estos elementos con los de otros estados europeos y se termina con concretas propuestas interpretativas y de lege ferenda.This paper analyses the patrimonial responsibility of the Judicial Power established in art. 121 Spanish Constitution. The paper describes the historical precedents of article 121 CE, the legislative development, the jurisprudential interpretation of it, which it could be considered unconstitutionally from the systematic perspective of the articles 17, 24, 106.2 and 121 CE; finally, there are a comparative analysis with other European countries and some reform proposals.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 398-398
Author(s):  
Luis H. Braga ◽  
Joao L. Pippi Salle ◽  
Sumit Dave ◽  
Sean Skeldon ◽  
Armando J. Lorenzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document