Rumex acetosa L. Rumex acetosella L. Rumex confertus Willd. Rumex conglomeratus Murray Rumex crispus L. Rumex tuberosus L. Polygonaceae

Author(s):  
Ketevan Batsatsashvili ◽  
Naiba Mehdiyeva ◽  
George Fayvush ◽  
Zaal Kikvidze ◽  
Manana Khutsishvili ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Ketevan Batsatsashvili ◽  
Naiba P. Mehdiyeva ◽  
George Fayvush ◽  
Zaal Kikvidze ◽  
Manana Khutsishvili ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1589-1594
Author(s):  
Narel Y. Paniagua-Zambrana ◽  
Rainer W. Bussmann ◽  
Javier Echeverría

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Bibaswan Biswas ◽  
Nilakshi Dey ◽  
G.V. Narasimha Kumar ◽  
Renu Arya ◽  
Anil Khurana

1989 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 1865-1869 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. A. C. J. Voesenek ◽  
C. W. P. M. Blom ◽  
R. H. W. Pouwels

The responses of Rumex acetosa, Rumex crispus, and Rumex palustris to different levels of waterlogging were studied in sand culture experiments. Rumex crispus and R. palustris developed new flooding-resistant roots as a response to waterlogging. The growth of these new roots caused a changed vertical distribution of the root length in these species; most root length was concentrated in the upper 10 cm of the soil. Rumex acetosa did not show significant development of flooding-resistant roots and did not change its vertical root distribution during flooding of the soil. The results of the experiments indicate that growth expressed as relative growth rate is positively correlated to the development of new flooding-resistant roots under waterlogged conditions. We concluded that R. crispus and R. palustris are more resistant to waterlogging than R. acetosa; this agrees with the distribution of these Rumex species in the field. However, waterlogging resistance is probably only one of the factors influencing differences in field location between the Rumex species.


Genome ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrice Mariotti ◽  
Rafael Navajas-Pérez ◽  
Rafael Lozano ◽  
John S Parker ◽  
Roberto de la Herrán ◽  
...  

Rumex acetosa is characterized by a multiple chromosome system (2n = 12 + XX for females, and 2n = 12 + XY1Y2 for males), in which sex is determined by the ratio between the number of X chromosomes and autosome sets. For a better understanding of the molecular structure and evolution of plant sex chromosomes, we have generated a sex chromosome specific library of R. acetosa by microdissection. The screening of this library has allowed us to identify 5 repetitive DNA families that have been characterized in detail. One of these families, DOP-20, has shown no homology with other sequences in databases. Nevertheless, the putative proteins encoded by the other 4 families, DOP-8, DOP-47, DOP-60, and DOP-61, show homology with proteins from different plant retroelements, including poly proteins from Ty3-gypsy- and Ty1-copia-like long terminal repeat (LTR) retroelements, and reverse transcriptase from non-LTR retro elements. Results indicate that sequences from these 5 families are dispersed throughout the genome of both males and females, but no appreciable accumulation or differentiation of these types of sequences have been found in the Y chromosomes. These repetitive DNA sequences are more conserved in the genome of other dioecious species such as Rumex papillaris, Rumex intermedius, Rumex thyrsoides, Rumex hastatulus, and Rumex suffruticosus, than in the polygamous, gynodioecious, or hermaphrodite species Rumex induratus, Rumex lunaria, Rumex con glom er atus, Rumex crispus, and Rumex bucephalo phorus, which supports a single origin of dioecious species in this genus. The implication of these transposable elements in the origin and evolution of the heteromorphic sex chromosomes of R. acetosa is discussed.Key words: Rumex acetosa, sex chromosomes, microdissection, evolution, retroelements.


Planta Medica ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Derksen ◽  
W Hafezi ◽  
A Hensel ◽  
J Kühn

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document