Accessibility Evaluation of Learning Object Using Agents

2017 ◽  
pp. 420-429
Author(s):  
Luis Londoño ◽  
Valentina Tabares ◽  
Néstor Duque ◽  
Mauricio Giraldo
Keyword(s):  
Learning Object ◽  
Accessibility Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Of Learning

Metrics-based evaluation of learning object reusability

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Sanz-Rodriguez ◽  
Juan Manuel Dodero ◽  
Salvador Sanchez-Alonso
Keyword(s):  
Learning Object ◽  
Evaluation Of Learning

scholarly journals A Convergent Participation Model for Evaluation of Learning Objects

2002 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
John Nesbit ◽  
Karen Belfer ◽  
John Vargo
Keyword(s):  
Formative Evaluation ◽  
Educational Software ◽  
Learning Objects ◽  
Social Recognition ◽  
Learning Object ◽  
Instructional Designers ◽  
Metadata Standards ◽  
Stage Process ◽  
Review Model ◽  
Evaluation Of Learning

The properties that distinguish learning objects from other forms of educational software - global accessibility, metadata standards, finer granularity and reusability - have implications for evaluation. This article proposes a convergent participation model for learning object evaluation in which representatives from stakeholder groups (e.g., students, instructors, subject matter experts, instructional designers, and media developers) converge toward more similar descriptions and ratings through a two-stage process supported by online collaboration tools. The article reviews evaluation models that have been applied to educational software and media, considers models for gathering and meta-evaluating individual user reviews that have recently emerged on the Web, and describes the peer review model adopted for the MERLOT repository. The convergent participation model is assessed in relation to other models and with respect to its support for eight goals of learning object evaluation: (1) aid for searching and selecting, (2) guidance for use, (3) formative evaluation, (4) influence on design practices, (5) professional development and student learning, (6) community building, (7) social recognition, and (8) economic exchange.

Comprehensive Evaluation of Learning Disabilities: A Response to Intervention Perspective

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank M. Gresham ◽  
Daniel J. Reschly ◽  
Jack Fletcher ◽  
Matthew Burns ◽  
Theodore Christ ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Response To Intervention ◽  
Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Of Learning

URGENSI EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN DALAM PENDIDIKAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-69
Author(s):  
Moh Fachri
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Learning Objectives ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Evaluation Tool ◽  
Professional Educators ◽  
Institutional Approach ◽  
Learning Evaluation ◽  
Effectiveness And Efficiency ◽  
Evaluation Of Learning

Learning process is the most important part in education as an effort to mature learners, The success of the learning process becomes a benchmark achievement of learning objectives. To know the achievement of the success of learning objectives, it must be done evaluation / assessment. In particular the purpose of evaluation to determine the progress of learning outcomes of learners after following the learning, as well as to determine the level of effectiveness and efficiency of methods, strategies that teachers use in learning. Evaluation of learning has an important and strategic meaning in education, because the learning process becomes meaningful, as well as its evaluation results can be used as a basis to determine the next step, for teachers, principals, institutions, parents, and government. The importance of learning evaluation can be seen from the approach of the learning process, the characteristics of professional educators, and the institutional approach, but it can also be seen from its purpose, function and principles and the validity and reliability of its evaluation tool.

Analisis Kesenjangan Pelaksanaan Standar Proses pada Pembelajaran Produktif di SMK

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atika Atika ◽  
I Made Sudana ◽  
Basyirun Basyirun
Keyword(s):  
Learning Process ◽  
Lesson Plan ◽  
Lesson Plans ◽  
Ministry Of Education ◽  
Standard Process ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Discrepancy Rate ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive ◽  
Concrete Solution ◽  
Evaluation Of Learning

Tujuan penelitian, diantaranya menguraikan bagaimana pelaksanaan standar proses, menganalisis seberapa tingkat kesenjangannya dan merancang bagaimana solusi permasalahan terkait kesenjangan pelaksanan standar proses. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Aspek dalam penelitian ini adalah (a) perencanaan pembelajaran; (b) pelaksanaan pembelajaran; (c) penilaian hasil belajar; (d) pengawasan oleh kepala sekolah. Teknik pengumpulaan data, yang digunakan adalah metode observasi, wawancara dan dokumentasi. Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam hal perencanaan pembelajaran diperoleh kriteria tidak senjang, artinya pada kegiatan perencanaan tidak banyak guru yang mengabaikan standar yang ditetapkan oleh Permendikbud No. 65 tahun 2013. Hasil analisis pelaksanaan pembelajaran diperoleh kriteria cukup senjang, artinya standar proses yang ditetapkan belum sepenuhnya dilaksanakan. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pada kegiatan penilaian masih diperoleh hasil cukup senjang, artinya masih terdapat ketentuan yang belum diterapkan. Hasil analisis pada komponen pengawasan memberikan kesimpulan jika masih terdapat kepala sekolah yang tidak menjalankan fungsinya sebagai pengawas internal.Therefore, the aims of study are to investigate the implementation of the standard process, analyze the discrepancy rate and design the solution toward the issue of discrepancy. This research uses the quantitative descriptive approach. There are several aspects investigated; (a) lesson plan, (b) learning process, (c) evaluation of learning result, and (d) headmasters control. To collect the data, the methods of observation, interview, and documentation are used. The result is explained in form of criteria. It is no discrepancy for lesson plans, means that most of the lesson plans are in accord with the Basic Principles issued by Ministry of Education and Culture Number 65 in 2013. The learning process has a quite discrepancy rate, means the standard process is incompletely applied; so does the evaluation which ignores several principles to apply. It is also noted that some headmasters ignore their function as an internal supervisor. To sum up, the discrepancy issue needs further concrete solution.

Analisis Perbedaan Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Ilmu Keguruan (Ftik) Iain Palu Pada Mata Kuliah Evaluasi Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Gender

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-190
Author(s):  
Wiwin Mistiani
Keyword(s):  
Student Achievement ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Female Students ◽  
Male Students ◽  
Error Level ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Learning Evaluation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Evaluation Of Learning

This study aims to determine the student achievement of male and female students on the subyek Evaluation of learning and to determine of Differences in student achievement FTIK IAIN Palu on the subject evaluastion learning by gender. The approach used is descriptive quantitative. While the population in this study are all students. The sampling technique is done by using proportional random sampling technique. With the number of students 60 people then the sample = 37 students of FTIK IAIN Palu. Technique of collecting data by using test and observation while data analysis using T test.From the research, 1) the average of learning achievement in the subject of male students' learning appraisal from 19 male students who are the sample in this research is 79,42 means good category. Meanwhile, from 18 female students who became the sample of the study, the average of learning achievement in the subject of female students' learning evaluation is 77 means either. 2) There is no significant difference Student Learning Achievement FTIK) IAIN Palu On the subject Evaluation Learning Based on Gender with t value equal to = 0,0267 with t table with dk 35 with error level 5% is 0,062.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document