Estimating the Similarities Between Texts of Right-Handed and Left-Handed Males and Females

2017 ◽  
pp. 119-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Litvinova ◽  
Pavel Seredin ◽  
Olga Litvinova ◽  
Ekaterina Ryzhkova
Keyword(s):  
Left Handed ◽  
Males And Females

scholarly journals The incidence of left-handedness: a meta-analysis [1993]

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Christopher McManus
Keyword(s):  
Sex Difference ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Birth Cohorts ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Left Handedness ◽  
Left Handed ◽  
Method Of Measurement ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Older Subjects ◽  
Unpublished Manuscripts

A meta-analysis is reported of 88 studies, examining 100 study populations, in which the handedness of 284665 individuals has been assessed. The overall incidence of left-handedness was 7.78%. The incidence of left-handedness was not related to the method of measurement, or the length or number of response items included in inventories. Study populations with lower response rates and smaller study populations showed some evidence of higher incidences of left-handedness, presumably due to response biasses. There was no evidence that the incidence of left-handedness was related to the year of publication of studies; however the incidence of left-handedness was lower in older subjects and in those from earlier birth cohorts, the two effects not being statistically distinguishable.Information was available from 64 study populations concerning the incidence of left-handedness in males and females; overall 8.52% of males were left-handed compared with 6.69% of females, the male incidence being 27.4% higher than that in females. Although there was some suggestion that the sex difference was greater in larger studies, and in studies whose main purpose was not the study of handedness, these differences were not significant. It is concluded that the size of the sex difference is unrelated to any of the moderator variables we have studied.It was not possible to carry out a meta-analysis of degree of handedness due to wide-spread differences in the method of reporting of degree of handedness.We recommend that future studies of handedness should, as a minimum, use one of three standard methods of assessment, so that comparison of studies is facilitated. Note: This manuscript was originally prepared in 1993 but due to problems at a major journal, described briefly, was never eventually published. It has however been cited on a number of occasions, and has been available at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/medical-education/publications/unpublished-manuscripts/meta-analysis-of-handedness . A major meta-analysis of handedness in 2019 by another author has now been submitted which cites this manuscript, and therefore it needs to be available in a more archivable format.

scholarly journals Hand Preference and Creativity of Papua University Student

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 257-262
Author(s):  
Vionita Putri ◽  
Elda Irma Jeanne Joice Kawulur ◽  
Febriza Dwiranti ◽  
Sabarita Sinuraya ◽  
Sita Ratnawati
Keyword(s):  
Hand Preference ◽  
University Student ◽  
Creative People ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Adjective Check List ◽  
Left Handed ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Papua Barat ◽  
The Right ◽  
Descriptive Method

Human has a preference to use their hands for various manual activities. Left-handed preference is people who tend to use their left hand to perform various manual activities, while right-handed people tend to use right-handed. Any researches show that the left-handed preference for more creativity was influenced by the dominant use of the right brain and bigger corpus callosum. The research aims to determine the percentage of left-handed preference and their creativity in Universitas Papua, Manokwari Papua Barat. The method used in this research is the descriptive method. Data collection used a questionnaire to evaluate individual hand preference using Handedness Questionnaire and to determine individual creativity using Adjective Check List. The percentage of left-handed people in UNIPA were 9.3% or lower than right-handed and higher than ambidextrous. Our study supports the statement about selection in handedness in the traditional society which showed a higher percentage of left-hander as advantages related to using hand intensively.  The percentage of left-handed males and females was almost equal and strongly left-handed was higher in females. The percentage of creative people was higher in left-handed, especially in males

Note on a Failure to Find Hemispheric Asymmetries for a Small Sample of Strongly Left- and Right-Handed Males and Females Using Verbal and Visuo-Spatial Recall

1980 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
David K. Charman
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Hemispheric Asymmetries ◽  
Left Handed ◽  
Negative Findings ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Spatial Positioning ◽  
Female Subjects

A column of letters was presented to the left, right, or center of the visual field of 10 male and 10 female subjects. 5 of each sex were either strongly left- or right-handed. The subjects' task was to position correctly the letters on a recall sheet. No significant hemispheric asymmetries emerged, a result that reflects other negative findings. The 10 females were significantly better at verbal identification; this was congruent with the literature. The 10 males and 10 females were equal in visuo-spatial (positioning) judgments; this did not support the literature. The 5 right-handed males were significantly inferior to the 5 left-handed males and the 10 females at positioning judgments, a result that remained unexplained. The findings were discussed in terms of other contradictory findings.

Frequency of Left-Handedness Among the Andhra Pradesh People

1975 ◽  
Vol 24 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 161-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. R. Dronamraju
Keyword(s):  
Andhra Pradesh ◽  
Tribal People ◽  
Left Handedness ◽  
Left Handed ◽  
Quantitative Studies ◽  
Aboriginal Populations ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Made In

The percentages of left-handed people among the males and females of Andhra Pradesh tribals in India were found to be 15.49 and 7.79, and in Hindus 6.9 and 4.65. The difference between the sexes among tribals is significant. The tribal people studied were Koya Doras, Sugalis {or Lambadis), and Konda Reddis. It is suggested that similar quantitative studies of left-handedness should be made in other tribal and aboriginal populations before they are culturally conditioned to right-handedness.

Event-related potentials during word-reading and figure-matching in left-handed and right-handed males and females

1989 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 525-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan W. Van Strien ◽  
Robert Licht ◽  
Anke Bouma ◽  
Dirk J. Bakker
Keyword(s):  
Word Reading ◽  
Event Related Potentials ◽  
Left Handed ◽  
Related Potentials ◽  
Males And Females

Senatorial signatures

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Nancy L. Segal ◽  
Francisca J. Niculae
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Power ◽  
Genetic Factors ◽  
Small Sample Size ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Left Handedness ◽  
Left Handed ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
General Populations ◽  
Larger Sample

Abstract A greater frequency of left-handedness among males than females has been observed in general populations. Past studies have explained this difference with reference to males’ greater susceptibility to adverse birth events, while more recent studies have identified other contributing factors. On January 16, 2020, U.S. senators signed an oath to act impartially during the president’s impeachment trial. This televised event allowed direct comparison of the proportion of right-handedness and left-handedness in a professionally accomplished sample of males and females. As expected, no sex difference in the proportion of left-handed senators was found, although the small sample size offered low statistical power. Replicating this finding with a larger sample would support the view that left-handedness among select groups of males is linked to genetic factors.

Bronchial stereocilia in the immotile cilia syndrome: A case report

1984 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 52-53
Author(s):  
George Price ◽  
Lizardo Cerezo
Keyword(s):  
Surface Modifications ◽  
Respiratory Epithelium ◽  
Immotile Cilia ◽  
Kartagener's Syndrome ◽  
Membrane Blebs ◽  
Radial Spokes ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Dynein Arms ◽  
Ultrastructural Finding ◽  
Ultrastructural Findings

Ultrastructural defects of ciliary structure have been known to cause recurrent sino-respiratory infection concurrent with Kartagener's syndrome. (1,2,3) These defects are also known to cause infertility in both males and females. (4) Overall, the defects are defined as the Immotile, or Dyskinetic Cilia Syndrome (DCS). Several ultrastructural findings have been described, including decreased number of cilia, multidirection orientation, fused and compound cilia, membrane blebs, excess matrix in the axoneme, missing outer tubular doublets, translocated doublets, defective radial spokes and dynein arms. A rare but noteworthy ultrastructural finding in DCS is the predominance of microvilli-like structures on the luminal surface of the respiratory epithelium. (5,6) These permanent surface modifications of the apical respiratory epithelium no longer resemble cilia but reflect the ultrastructure of stereocilia, similar to that found in the epidydimal epithelium. Like microvilli, stereocilia are devoid of microtubular ultrastructure in comparison with true cilia.

Single molecule optical diffraction: A tool for understanding the structure of triple stranded left-hand helical cellulose

1989 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 1024-1025
Author(s):  
George C. Ruben ◽  
William Krakow
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Helical Structure ◽  
Optical Diffraction ◽  
Maximum Diameter ◽  
Primary Cell Wall ◽  
Cellulose Synthesis ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Left Handed ◽  
Freeze Dried ◽  
Diffraction Patterns

Tobacco primary cell wall and normal bacterial Acetobacter xylinum cellulose formation produced a 36.8±3Å triple-stranded left-hand helical microfibril in freeze-dried Pt-C replicas and in negatively stained preparations for TEM. As three submicrofibril strands exit the wall of Axylinum , they twist together to form a left-hand helical microfibril. This process is driven by the left-hand helical structure of the submicrofibril and by cellulose synthesis. That is, as the submicrofibril is elongating at the wall, it is also being left-hand twisted and twisted together with two other submicrofibrils. The submicrofibril appears to have the dimensions of a nine (l-4)-ß-D-glucan parallel chain crystalline unit whose long, 23Å, and short, 19Å, diagonals form major and minor left-handed axial surface ridges every 36Å.The computer generated optical diffraction of this model and its corresponding image have been compared. The submicrofibril model was used to construct a microfibril model. This model and corresponding microfibril images have also been optically diffracted and comparedIn this paper we compare two less complex microfibril models. The first model (Fig. 1a) is constructed with cylindrical submicrofibrils. The second model (Fig. 2a) is also constructed with three submicrofibrils but with a single 23 Å diagonal, projecting from a rounded cross section and left-hand helically twisted, with a 36Å repeat, similar to the original model (45°±10° crossover angle). The submicrofibrils cross the microfibril axis at roughly a 45°±10° angle, the same crossover angle observed in microflbril TEM images. These models were constructed so that the maximum diameter of the submicrofibrils was 23Å and the overall microfibril diameters were similar to Pt-C coated image diameters of ∼50Å and not the actual diameter of 36.5Å. The methods for computing optical diffraction patterns have been published before.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document