Within-Event and Between-Events Ground Motion Variability from Earthquake Rupture Scenarios

2017 ◽  
pp. 127-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge G. F. Crempien ◽  
Ralph J. Archuleta
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Earthquake Rupture ◽  
Ground Motion Variability

Within-Event and Between-Events Ground Motion Variability from Earthquake Rupture Scenarios

2017 ◽  
Vol 174 (9) ◽  
pp. 3451-3465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge G. F. Crempien ◽  
Ralph J. Archuleta
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Earthquake Rupture ◽  
Ground Motion Variability

High-frequency ground-motion variability for rough-fault ruptures  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jagdish Chandra Vyas ◽  
Martin Galis ◽  
Paul Martin Mai
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Earthquake Ground Motion ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Dynamic Rupture ◽  
Roughness Effects ◽  
Ground Shaking ◽  
Fault Surface ◽  
Fault Roughness ◽  
Ground Motion Variability

<p>Geological observations show variations in fault-surface topography not only at large scale (segmentation) but also at small scale (roughness). These geometrical complexities strongly affect the stress distribution and frictional strength of the fault, and therefore control the earthquake rupture process and resulting ground-shaking. Previous studies examined fault-segmentation effects on ground-shaking, but our understanding of fault-roughness effects on seismic wavefield radiation and earthquake ground-motion is still limited.  </p><p>In this study we examine the effects of fault roughness on ground-shaking variability as a function of distance based on 3D dynamic rupture simulations. We consider linear slip-weakening friction, variations of fault-roughness parametrizations, and alternative nucleation positions (unilateral and bilateral ruptures). We use generalized finite difference method to compute synthetic waveforms (max. resolved frequency 5.75 Hz) at numerous surface sites  to carry out statistical analysis.  </p><p>Our simulations reveal that ground-motion variability from unilateral ruptures is almost independent of  distance from the fault, with comparable or higher values than estimates from ground-motion prediction equations (e.g., Boore and Atkinson, 2008; Campbell and Bozornia, 2008). However, ground-motion variability from bilateral ruptures decreases with increasing distance, in contrast to previous studies (e.g., Imtiaz et. al., 2015) who observe an increasing trend with distance. Ground-shaking variability from unilateral ruptures is higher than for bilateral ruptures, a feature due to intricate seismic radiation patterns related to fault roughness and hypocenter location. Moreover, ground-shaking variability for rougher faults is lower than for smoother faults. As fault roughness increases the difference in ground-shaking variabilities between unilateral and bilateral ruptures increases. In summary, our simulations help develop a fundamental understanding of ground-motion variability at high frequencies (~ 6 Hz) due small-scale geometrical fault-surface variations.</p>

Multicycle Simulation of Strike-Slip Earthquake Rupture for Use in Near-Source Ground-Motion Simulations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Percy Galvez ◽  
Anatoly Petukhin ◽  
Paul Somerville ◽  
Jean-Paul Ampuero ◽  
Ken Miyakoshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Stress Drop ◽  
Slip Rate ◽  
Rupture Process ◽  
Earthquake Rupture ◽  
Rupture Velocity ◽  
Source Inversion ◽  
Dynamic Rupture ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Source Scaling

ABSTRACT Realistic dynamic rupture modeling validated by observed earthquakes is necessary for estimating parameters that are poorly resolved by seismic source inversion, such as stress drop, rupture velocity, and slip rate function. Source inversions using forward dynamic modeling are increasingly used to obtain earthquake rupture models. In this study, to generate a large number of physically self-consistent rupture models, rupture process of which is consistent with the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of stress produced by previous earthquakes on the same fault, we use multicycle simulations under the rate and state (RS) friction law. We adopt a one-way coupling from multicycle simulations to dynamic rupture simulations; the quasidynamic solver QDYN is used to nucleate the seismic events and the spectral element dynamic solver SPECFEM3D to resolve their rupture process. To simulate realistic seismicity, with a wide range of magnitudes and irregular recurrence, several realizations of 2D-correlated heterogeneous random distributions of characteristic weakening distance (Dc) in RS friction are tested. Other important parameters are the normal stress, which controls the stress drop and rupture velocity during an earthquake, and the maximum value of Dc, which controls rupture velocity but not stress drop. We perform a parametric study on a vertical planar fault and generate a set of a hundred spontaneous rupture models in a wide magnitude range (Mw 5.5–7.4). We validate the rupture models by comparison of source scaling, ground motion (GM), and surface slip properties to observations. We compare the source-scaling relations between rupture area, average slip, and seismic moment of the modeled events with empirical ones derived from source inversions. Near-fault GMs are computed from the source models. Their peak ground velocities and peak ground accelerations agree well with the ground-motion prediction equation values. We also obtain good agreement of the surface fault displacements with observed values.

Hard as a rock? Looking for typical and atypical reference sites in the Greek network

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga-Joan Ktenidou ◽  
Faidra Gkika ◽  
Erion-Vasilis Pikoulis ◽  
Christos Evangelidis
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Site Response ◽  
Time Budget ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
General Rule ◽  
Spectral Ratio ◽  
Reference Sites ◽  
Motion Models ◽  
Ground Motion Variability

<p>Although it is nowadays desirable and even typical to characterise site conditions in detail at modern recording stations, this is not yet a general rule in Greece, due to the large number and geographical dispersion of stations. Indeed, most of them are still characterised merely through geological descriptions or proxy-based parameters, rather than through in-situ measurements. Considering: 1. the progress made in recent years with sophisticated ground motion models and the need to define region-specific rock conditions based on data, 2. the move towards large open-access strong-motion databases that require detailed site metadata, and 3. that Greek-provenance recordings represent a significant portion of European seismic data, there are many reasons to improve our understanding of site response at these stations. Moreover, it has been shown recently in several regions that even sites considered as rock can exhibit amplification and ground motion variability, which has given rise to more scientific research into the definition of reference sites. For Greece, in-situ-characterisation campaigns for the entire network would impose unattainable time/budget constraints; so, instead, we implement alternative empirical approaches using the recordings themselves, such as the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio technique and its variability. We present examples of 'well-behaved', typical rock sites, and others whose response diverges from what is assumed for their class.</p><p> </p>

Spatial Distribution of Ground‐Motion Variability in Broadband Ground‐Motion Simulations

2017 ◽  
Vol 107 (6) ◽  
pp. 2963-2979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asako Iwaki ◽  
Nobuyuki Morikawa ◽  
Takahiro Maeda ◽  
Hiroyuki Fujiwara
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Ground Motion Simulations ◽  
Ground Motion Variability ◽  
Broadband Ground Motion

scholarly journals Frequency‐Scaled Curvature as a Proxy for Topographic Site‐Effect Amplification and Ground‐Motion Variability

2014 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 354-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emeline Maufroy ◽  
Víctor M. Cruz‐Atienza ◽  
Fabrice Cotton ◽  
Stéphane Gaffet
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Site Effect ◽  
Ground Motion Variability

Recent Developments in the Treatment of Ground-Motion Variability in Earthquake Loss Models

2008 ◽  
Vol 12 (sup2) ◽  
pp. 71-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Crowley ◽  
Julian J. Bommer ◽  
Peter J. Stafford
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Ground Motion Variability ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Earthquake Loss ◽  
Loss Models
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document