Learning from Practical Experience: Implementation Epistemic Communities in the European Union

2018 ◽  
pp. 123-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Polman
2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 753-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
NEIL J. MITCHELL ◽  
KERRY G. HERRON ◽  
HANK C. JENKINS-SMITH ◽  
GUY D. WHITTEN

Do elites with scientific expertise hold similar policy preferences in technical policy areas irrespective of their ideological and national background? It is expected that elite beliefs will exhibit a higher level of ideological constraint than mass beliefs do, yet we do not know much about the role of ideology and national context in shaping more specific policy preferences. In this research note, we report the findings of an analysis of the influence of ideology and national context on the policy beliefs of scientific elites in the member countries of the European Union and in the United States.Recent research on epistemic communities, or ‘networks of knowledge-based experts’, suggests that scientific elites will achieve transnational convergence on policy positions, particularly over complex and technical policy questions: ‘to the extent that epistemic communities make some of the world's problems more amenable to human reason and intervention, they can curb some of the international system's anarchic tendencies, temper some of the excesses of a purely state-centric order, and perhaps even help bring about a better international order’. Nuclear security issues and environmental issues are policy areas identified as amenable to an epistemic communities approach. Earlier research is divided over the degree to which ideology influences scientists' policy beliefs. But there have been no systematic cross-national analyses of the influence of scientific training in suppressing ‘state-centric’ and ideological concerns in the determination of policy preferences.With a substantive focus on scientific elites' beliefs and preferences on security and energy policy issues, our aim is to extend this research to a comparative setting and provide a preliminary understanding of the extent to which knowledge and scientific training provide insulation from ideology, patriotism and ‘state-centric’ concerns.


2008 ◽  
Vol 54 (No. 1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. David ◽  
D. Nerudová

Tax harmonization in the European Union has the greatest development in the field of value added taxation, but differences still can be found. Those differences influence not only the farming business. The paper is aimed on five European Union member states – Czech Republic, Poland, Romania, Slovak Republic and Hungary. Based on the European Union regulations in the field of value added tax and the practical experience during its application, it is possible to identify the critical areas and to contribute to its correction and to provide the value added tax neutrality and efficiency on the European Union territory.


2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Spence

AbstractThe assumption that the European Union is creating a new diplomacy begs many questions. However, it is clear that the role of national diplomats in the integrative processes has changed dramatically during the last 50 years, producing a blueprint for a new form of European diplomacy. It is apparent that European diplomacy has been characterized by the existence of two broad but distinct diplomatic career paths, each with a separate and specific mindset, and that there are, arguably, two identifiable epistemic communities of European diplomats — national and supranational — sometimes cooperating willingly, sometimes reluctantly, in an interplay between national and EU diplomacy. Against this background, in the short term a 'variable geometry' of representation is likely to continue, as member states refashion their networks of representation, influenced by a combination of international involvement, perceptions of national need and, at times, the unwelcome dictates of diminishing national resources. But a new European diplomacy already exists alongside the old, and its distinctive feature is the withering away of explicit national interests.


Liburna ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Čutuk ◽  
Lana Hudeček

The paper deals with the problem of standardization of terms in business language, focusing on the business language used in day to day communication in Coca-Cola HBC Croatia. The paper has been instigated by practical experience of the compilation of Coca-Cole HBC Croatia Language Manual. The main aim of this manual is to facilitate daily communication in this company as well as to raise the level of business communication in general. It has originated in the framework of company’s effort to function in accordance with the principle of responsibility towards society, which includes the responsibility towards the Croatian language, especially at this moment when the future status of the language is determined among the languages of the European Union. In the fi rst part of the paper, the authors give an overview of the phases in the compilation of the Manual and describe the wider framework in which it was compiled as well as the planned aims and achieved results. In the second part, the authors give terminological principles which they followed in order to standardize the terminology. On a number of examples they explain how they decided which term should be selected as the preferred one. They show that the standardization of terminology is not a random process but a complex procedure based on clear principles.


Author(s):  
Herman Lelieveldt ◽  
Sebastiaan Princen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document