A Level Set Segmentation Method of the Four Heart Cavities in Pediatric Ultrasound Images

Author(s):  
Sofia G. Antunes ◽  
José Silvestre Silva ◽  
Jaime B. Santos
2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 24-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Viswanath ◽  
R. Gunasundari

The abnormalities of the kidney can be identified by ultrasound imaging. The kidney may have structural abnormalities like kidney swelling, change in its position and appearance. Kidney abnormality may also arise due to the formation of stones, cysts, cancerous cells, congenital anomalies, blockage of urine etc. For surgical operations it is very important to identify the exact and accurate location of stone in the kidney. The ultrasound images are of low contrast and contain speckle noise. This makes the detection of kidney abnormalities rather challenging task. Thus preprocessing of ultrasound images is carried out to remove speckle noise. In preprocessing, first image restoration is done to reduce speckle noise then it is applied to Gabor filter for smoothening. Next the resultant image is enhanced using histogram equalization. The preprocessed ultrasound image is segmented using distance regularized level set segmentation (DR-LSS), since it yields better results. It uses a two-step splitting methods to iteratively solve the DR-LSS equation, first step is iterating LSS equation, and then solving the Sign distance equation. The second step is to regularize the level set function which is the obtained from first step for better stability. The DR is included for LSS for eliminating of anti-leakages on image boundary. The DR-LSS does not require any expensive re-initialization and it is very high speed of operation. The RD-LSS results are compared with distance regularized level set evolution DRLSE1, DRLSE2 and DRLSE3. Extracted region of the kidney after segmentation is applied to Symlets (Sym12), Biorthogonal (bio3.7, bio3.9 & bio4.4) and Daubechies (Db12) lifting scheme wavelet subbands to extract energy levels. These energy level gives an indication about presence of stone in that particular location which significantly vary from that of normal energy level. These energy levels are trained by Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Back Propagation (BP) ANN to identify the type of stone with an accuracy of 98.6%.


Author(s):  
Huimin Lu ◽  
Yujie Li ◽  
Lifeng Zhang ◽  
Shiyuan Yang ◽  
Seiichi Serikawa

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brennan J Russnel ◽  
Roger A Pierson ◽  
Jaswant Singh ◽  
Gregg P Adams ◽  
Mark G Eramian

2012 ◽  
Vol 157-158 ◽  
pp. 1012-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Miao ◽  
Wei Li Shi

Medical image segmentation can be divided into two categories: one is the region of interest (ROI) identification; the other is the description of the integrity and the extraction of interest region. The emergence of the level set method greatly promoted the development of medical image segmentation. This paper studies three different level set segmentation algorithm to achieve the effective segmentation for brain gray matter and white matter of MRI image.


Author(s):  
Fahmi Syuhada ◽  
Rarasmaya Indraswari ◽  
Agus Zainal Arifin ◽  
Dini Adni Navastara

Segmentation of dental Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images based on Boundary Tracking has been widely used in recent decades. Generally, the process only uses axial projection data of CBCT where the slices image that representing the tip of the tooth object have decreased in contrast which impact to difficult to distinguish with background or other elements. In this paper we propose the multi-projection segmentation method by combining the level set segmentation result on three projections to detect the tooth object more optimally. Multiprojection is performed by decomposing CBCT data which produces three projections called axial, sagittal and coronal projections. Then, the segmentation based on the set level method is implemented on the slices image in the three projections. The results of the three projections are combined to get the final result of this method. This proposed method obtains evaluation results of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity with values of 97.18%, 88.62%, and 97.61%, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document