Evaluation of the Human Genomic DNA Extraction from Hair Root Method

Author(s):  
Nguyen Thi Hue ◽  
Nguyen Thi Thao Linh
2011 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 179-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen Thi Hue ◽  
Phan Tuan Phong ◽  
Nguyen Dieu Hoai Chan ◽  
Nguyen Khac Han Hoan ◽  
Huynh Thi Thu Thuy

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-99
Author(s):  
Shengnan Jin ◽  
Qian Ye ◽  
Yanping Hong ◽  
Wenqing Dai ◽  
Chengliang Zhang ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesColorectal cancer (CRC) screening using stool samples is now in routine use where tumor DNA methylation analysis for leading markers such as NDRG4 and SDC2 is an integral part of the test. However, processing stool samples for reproducible and efficient extraction of human genomic DNA remains a bottleneck for further research into better biomarkers and assays.MethodsWe systematically evaluated several factors involved in the processing of stool samples and extraction of DNA. These factors include: stool processing (solid and homogenized samples), preparation of DNA from supernatant and pellets, and DNA extraction with column and magnetic beads-based methods. Furthermore, SDC2 and NDRG4 methylation levels were used to evaluate the clinical performance of the optimal protocol.ResultsThe yield of total and human genomic DNA (hgDNA) was not reproducible when solid stool scraping is used, possibly due to sampling variations. More reproducible results were obtained from homogenized stool samples. Magnetic beads-based DNA extraction using the supernatant from the homogenized stool was chosen for further analysis due to better reproducibility, higher hgDNA yield, lower non-hgDNA background, and the potential for automation. With this protocol, a combination of SDC2 and NDRG4 methylation signals with a linear regression model achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 81.82 and 93.75%, respectively.ConclusionsThrough the systematic evaluation of different stool processing and DNA extraction methods, we established a reproducible protocol for analyzing tumor DNA methylation markers in stool samples for colorectal cancer screening.


2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 467-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Calvano Küchler ◽  
Patricia Nivoloni Tannure ◽  
Priscila Falagan-Lotsch ◽  
Taliria Silva Lopes ◽  
Jose Mauro Granjeiro ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1068-1073
Author(s):  
Xiaolan KONG ◽  
Zuozhi CHEN ◽  
Lin LIN ◽  
Chunhou LI ◽  
Peiwen LIANG

1988 ◽  
Vol 16 (21) ◽  
pp. 10355-10355 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. de Franchis ◽  
N. C. P. Cross ◽  
N. S. Foulkes ◽  
T. M. Cox

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 4659-4666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay Bhooshan Kumar ◽  
Clara Ermine Sawian ◽  
Dambarudhar Mohanta ◽  
Shashi Baruah ◽  
NashreenS. Islam

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. S220
Author(s):  
Karlygash Aubakirova ◽  
Madina Omasheva ◽  
Natalya Ryabushkina ◽  
Laura Yerbolova ◽  
Tolepbergen Tazhibaev ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document