Pain Management in Companion Animals: Medical–Legal Aspects

2013 ◽  
pp. 141-145
Author(s):  
V. Quartarone ◽  
A. Fazio ◽  
G. della Rocca ◽  
M. Russo ◽  
A. Passantino
2010 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 511-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Meyr ◽  
John S. Steinberg

The topic of pain management remains a minor component of the formal education and training of residents and physicians in the United States. Misguided attitudes concerning acute and chronic pain management, in addition to reservations about the legal aspects of pain management, often translate into a “fear of the unknown” when it comes to narcotic prescription. The intentionally limited scope of this review is to promote an understanding of the laws regulating pain management practices in the United States and to provide recommendations for appropriate pain management assessment and documentation based on the Model Policy for the Use of Controlled Substances for the Treatment of Pain established by the Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 100(6): 511–517, 2010)


Author(s):  
Mandy B.A. Paterson ◽  
Philip Jamieson

Abstract Although the sterilization of pregnant companion animals occurs regularly in private veterinary clinics and animal shelters, there is growing concern amongst veterinarians and animal welfare supporters about the appropriateness of carrying out this procedure. The ethical and legal perspectives of the procedure have not been widely discussed in the available literature. This paper aims to remedy this situation. It considers the sterilization of pregnant companion animals using four ethical frameworks: animal rights, utilitarian, relational and contractarian. The possible interests of all involved parties, including the animal itself, the unborn young, the veterinarian, shelter and clinic staff, and the wider community are included. Where the science on companion animals in this area is limited, the paper draws on science involving other species. The legal aspects are discussed with analogies to human abortion laws. The paper concludes by providing a framework that veterinarians and others can use when making ethical decisions.


Anaesthesia ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 56 (11) ◽  
pp. 1031-1033 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Phillips
Keyword(s):  
The Real ◽  

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 100703
Author(s):  
Shantanu Warhadpande ◽  
Stephanie L. Dybul ◽  
Minhaj S. Khaja

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (15) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
WILLIAM E. GOLDEN ◽  
ROBERT H. HOPKINS

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document