scholarly journals Evaluating Cloud Services Using a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Approach

2013 ◽  
pp. 456-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Costa ◽  
João Carlos Lourenço ◽  
Miguel Mira da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Decision Analysis ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Cloud Services ◽  
Analysis Approach ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis

A GIS-based Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis approach for wind power plant site selection

2015 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 86-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazim Baris Atici ◽  
Ahmet Bahadir Simsek ◽  
Aydin Ulucan ◽  
Mustafa Umur Tosun
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Decision Analysis ◽  
Wind Power ◽  
Site Selection ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Analysis Approach ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis ◽  
Wind Power Plant ◽  
Plant Site

Residence site selection in urban and rural areas in Greece: a multiple-criteria decision analysis approach

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios A. Thanos ◽  
Michalis Gr. Vrachopoulos ◽  
Maria K. Koukou ◽  
Andreas P. Kakouris ◽  
Alexandros Koulis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Analysis ◽  
Site Selection ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Analysis Approach ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis ◽  
Urban And Rural Areas

scholarly journals Multiple criteria decision analysis approach to consider therapeutic innovations in the emergency department: The methoxyflurane organizational impact in acute trauma pain

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. e0231571
Author(s):  
Virginie Eve Lvovschi ◽  
Maxime Maignan ◽  
Karim Tazarourte ◽  
Mohamed Lamine Diallo ◽  
Caroline Hadjadj-Baillot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Decision Analysis ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Analysis Approach ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis ◽  
Organizational Impact ◽  
Acute Trauma

Measuring Smart City Performance: a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Approach

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pantelis Sotirelis ◽  
Panagiotis Nakopoulos ◽  
Theodora Valvi ◽  
Evangelos Grigoroudis ◽  
Elias Carayannis
Keyword(s):  
Decision Analysis ◽  
Smart City ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Analysis Approach ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis

scholarly journals Supporting contaminated sites management with Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: Demonstration of a regulation-consistent approach

2021 ◽  
pp. 128347
Author(s):  
Marco Cinelli ◽  
Michael A. Gonzalez ◽  
Robert Ford ◽  
John McKernan ◽  
Salvatore Corrente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Analysis ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Contaminated Sites ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis ◽  
Consistent Approach

scholarly journals Development and Practical Application of a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework on Respiratory Inhalers: Is It Always Useful in the MOH Malaysia Medicines Formulary Listing Context?

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 238146832199406
Author(s):  
Yee Vern Yong ◽  
Siti Hajar Mahamad Dom ◽  
Nurulmaya Ahmad Sa’ad ◽  
Rosliza Lajis ◽  
Faridah Aryani Md. Yusof ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Analysis ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Additive Model ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis ◽  
Expert Committee ◽  
Microsoft Excel ◽  
Economic Criterion ◽  
Published Evidence ◽  
Framework Development

Objectives. The current health technology assessment used to evaluate respiratory inhalers is associated with limitations that have necessitated the development of an explicit formulary decision-making framework to ensure balance between the accessibility, value, and affordability of medicines. This study aimed to develop a multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework, apply the framework to potential and currently listed respiratory inhalers in the Ministry of Health Medicines Formulary (MOHMF), and analyze the impacts of applying the outputs, from the perspective of listing and delisting medicines in the formulary. Methods. The overall methodology of the framework development adhered to the recommendations of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. The MCDA framework was developed using Microsoft Excel 2010 and involved all relevant stakeholders. The framework was then applied to 27 medicines, based on data gathered from the highest levels of available published evidence, pharmaceutical companies, and professional opinions. The performance scores were analyzed using the additive model. The end values were then deliberated by an expert committee. Results. A total of eight main criteria and seven subcriteria were determined by the stakeholders. The economic criterion was weighted at 30%. Among the noneconomic criteria, “patient suitability” was weighted the highest. Based on the MCDA outputs, the expert committee recommended one potential medicine (out of three; 33%) be added to the MOHMF and one existing medicine (out of 24; 4%) be removed/delisted from the MOHMF. The other existing medicines remained unchanged. Conclusions. Although this framework was useful for deciding to add new medicines to the formulary, it appears to be less functional and impactful for the removal/delisting existing medicines from the MOHMF. The generalizability of this conclusion to other formulations remains to be confirmed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document