The Worst-Case DFT Filter Bank Design with Subchannel Variations

Author(s):  
Lin Jiang ◽  
Changzhi Wu ◽  
Xiangyu Wang ◽  
Kok Lay Teo
Keyword(s):  
2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.J. de Ana ◽  
M. O'Donnell

Previously, we presented a real-time method to measure blood flow perpendicular to the image plane of an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging system using a slow-time FIR (finite impulse response) filter bank. Any in-plane flow introduces error in the flow measurement using the filter bank algorithm. Simulations show that for a flow angle of ±10° and velocities between 200 mm/s and 300 mm/s, the energy within the lowest frequency band filter is 6.92 to 7.80 times higher than for perpendicular flow in the worst case. We present a variation of the FIR filter bank algorithm, applying filter coefficients in a tilted fashion to slow-time signals (i.e., combining slow-time and fast-time). An appropriate tilt, which depends on the flow angle and velocity, corrects for the increased energy under the frequency bands. In this case, the energy under the lowest frequency band filter for an angle of ±10° and velocities ranging from 200 mm/s to 300 mm/s is 2.09 to 2.94 times higher than for perpendicular flow, yielding greater than a factor of three improvement in the worst case over the original slow-time method. Moreover, the average energy over the vessel determined with the appropriate tilt is within 2–3% of the true value.


Author(s):  
J.D. Geller ◽  
C.R. Herrington

The minimum magnification for which an image can be acquired is determined by the design and implementation of the electron optical column and the scanning and display electronics. It is also a function of the working distance and, possibly, the accelerating voltage. For secondary and backscattered electron images there are usually no other limiting factors. However, for x-ray maps there are further considerations. The energy-dispersive x-ray spectrometers (EDS) have a much larger solid angle of detection that for WDS. They also do not suffer from Bragg’s Law focusing effects which limit the angular range and focusing distance from the diffracting crystal. In practical terms EDS maps can be acquired at the lowest magnification of the SEM, assuming the collimator does not cutoff the x-ray signal. For WDS the focusing properties of the crystal limits the angular range of acceptance of the incident x-radiation. The range is dependent upon the 2d spacing of the crystal, with the acceptance angle increasing with 2d spacing. The natural line width of the x-ray also plays a role. For the metal layered crystals used to diffract soft x-rays, such as Be - O, the minimum magnification is approximately 100X. In the worst case, for the LEF crystal which diffracts Ti - Zn, ˜1000X is the minimum.


Author(s):  
Yuan-Pei Lin ◽  
See-May Phoong ◽  
P. P. Vaidyanathan
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Savelli ◽  
Susan Joslyn ◽  
Limor Nadav-Greenberg ◽  
Queena Chen

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Martin ◽  
E. Moyer ◽  
B. Beamer

2019 ◽  
Vol 139 (11) ◽  
pp. 551-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Kawamura ◽  
Masaaki Fuse ◽  
Shigenori Mattori

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document