Mineral Associations in Diamonds from the Lowermost Upper Mantle and Uppermost Lower Mantle

2013 ◽  
pp. 235-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Harte ◽  
Neil F. C. Hudson
Keyword(s):  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Lower Mantle ◽  
Mineral Associations

scholarly journals Feedbacks between a non-Newtonian upper mantle, mantle viscosity structure and mantle dynamics

2020 ◽  
Vol 224 (2) ◽  
pp. 961-972
Author(s):  
A G Semple ◽  
A Lenardic
Keyword(s):  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Lower Mantle ◽  
Mantle Convection ◽  
Mantle Flow ◽  
Mantle Dynamics ◽  
Plate Motions ◽  
Low Viscosity ◽  
Mantle Viscosity ◽  
Flow Feature ◽  
Mantle Rheology

SUMMARY Previous studies have shown that a low viscosity upper mantle can impact the wavelength of mantle flow and the balance of plate driving to resisting forces. Those studies assumed that mantle viscosity is independent of mantle flow. We explore the potential that mantle flow is not only influenced by viscosity but can also feedback and alter mantle viscosity structure owing to a non-Newtonian upper-mantle rheology. Our results indicate that the average viscosity of the upper mantle, and viscosity variations within it, are affected by the depth to which a non-Newtonian rheology holds. Changes in the wavelength of mantle flow, that occur when upper-mantle viscosity drops below a critical value, alter flow velocities which, in turn, alter mantle viscosity. Those changes also affect flow profiles in the mantle and the degree to which mantle flow drives the motion of a plate analogue above it. Enhanced upper-mantle flow, due to an increasing degree of non-Newtonian behaviour, decreases the ratio of upper- to lower-mantle viscosity. Whole layer mantle convection is maintained but upper- and lower-mantle flow take on different dynamic forms: fast and concentrated upper-mantle flow; slow and diffuse lower-mantle flow. Collectively, mantle viscosity, mantle flow wavelengths, upper- to lower-mantle velocities and the degree to which the mantle can drive plate motions become connected to one another through coupled feedback loops. Under this view of mantle dynamics, depth-variable mantle viscosity is an emergent flow feature that both affects and is affected by the configuration of mantle and plate flow.

scholarly journals Temperature distribution in the three-layered upper mantle beneath a continent

2021 ◽  
Vol 2119 (1) ◽  
pp. 012006
Author(s):  
A G Kirdyashkin ◽  
A A Kirdyashkin ◽  
A V Borodin ◽  
V S Kolmakov
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Temperature Distribution ◽  
Convective Heat Transfer ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Lower Mantle ◽  
Transfer Equation ◽  
Horizontal Layer ◽  
Heat Transfer Equation ◽  
Continental Lithosphere ◽  
Conduction Heat Transfer

Abstract Temperature distribution in the upper mantle underneath the continent, as well as temperature distribution in the lower mantle, is obtained. In the continental lithosphere, the solution to the heat transfer equation is obtained in the model of conduction heat transfer with inner heat within the crust. To calculate the temperature distribution in the upper and lower mantle, we use the results of laboratory and theoretical modeling of free convective heat transfer in a horizontal layer heated from below and cooled from above.

On the fate of water in the formation of rocky planets

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindy Elkins-Tanton ◽  
Jenny Suckale ◽  
Sonia Tikoo
Keyword(s):  
Water Content ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Lower Mantle ◽  
Plate Tectonics ◽  
Solidus Temperature ◽  
Magma Ocean ◽  
Excess Water ◽  
Low Degree ◽  
Giant Impacts ◽  
Rocky Planets

<p>Rocky planets go through at least one and likely multiple magma ocean stages, produced by the giant impacts of accretion. Planetary data and models show that giant impacts do not dehydrate either the mantle or the atmosphere of their target planets. The magma ocean liquid consists of melted target material and melted impactor, and so will be dominated by silicate melt, and also contain dissolved volatiles including water, carbon, and sulfur compounds.</p><p>As the magma ocean cools and solidifies, water and other volatiles will be incorporated into the nominally anhydrous mantle phases up to their saturation limits, and will otherwise be enriched in the remaining, evolving magma ocean liquids. The water content of the resulting cumulate mantle is therefore the sum of the traces in the mineral grains, and any water in trapped interstitial liquids. That trapped liquid fraction may in fact be by far the largest contributor to the cumulate water budget.</p><p>The water and other dissolved volatiles in the evolving liquids may quickly reach the saturation limit of magmas near the surface, where pressure is low, but degassing the magma ocean is likely more difficult than has been assumed in some of our models. To degas into the atmosphere, the gases must exsolve from the liquid and form bubbles, and those bubbles must be able to rise quickly enough to avoid being dragged down by convection and re-dissolved at higher pressures. If bubbles are buoyant enough (that is, large enough) to decouple from flow and rise, then they are also dynamically unstable and liable to be torn into smaller bubbles and re-entrained. This conundrum led to the hypothesis that volatiles do not significantly degas until a high level of supersaturation is reached, and the bubbles form a buoyant layer and rise in diapirs in a continuum dynamics sense. This late degassing would have the twin effects of increasing the water content of the cumulates, and of speeding up cooling and solidification of the planet.</p><p>Once the mantle is solidified, the timeclock until the start of plate tectonics begins. Modern plate tectonics is thought to rely on water to lower the viscosity of the asthenosphere, but plate tectonics is also thought to be the process by which water is brought into the mantle. Magma ocean solidification, however, offers two relevant processes. First, following solidification the cumulate mantle is gravitationally unstable and overturns to stability, carrying water-bearing minerals from the upper mantle through the transition zone and into the lower mantle. Upon converting to lower-mantle phases, these minerals will release their excess water, since lower mantle phases have lower saturation limits, thus fluxing the upper mantle with water. Second, the mantle will be near its solidus temperature still, and thus its viscosity will be naturally low. When fluxed with excess water, the upper mantle would be expected to form a low degree melt, which if voluminous enough with rise to help form the earliest crust, and if of very low degree, will further reduce the viscosity of the asthenosphere.</p>

3. Minerals and the interior of the Earth

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Vaughan
Keyword(s):  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Lower Mantle ◽  
Plate Tectonics ◽  
Inner Core ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
Outer Core ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Granite Formation ◽  
Temperature And Pressure

‘Minerals and the interior of the Earth’ looks at the role of minerals in plate tectonics during the processes of crystallization and melting. The size and range of minerals formed are dependent on the temperature and pressure of the magma during its movement through the crust. The evolution of the continental crust also involves granite formation and processes of metamorphism. Our understanding of the interior of the Earth is based on indirect evidence, mainly the study of earthquake waves. The Earth consists of concentric shells: a solid inner core; liquid outer core; a solid mantle divided into a lower mantle, a transition zone, and an upper mantle; and then the outer rigid lithosphere.

Density and composition of the lower mantle

1989 ◽  
Vol 328 (1599) ◽  
pp. 377-389 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Density Distribution ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Lower Mantle ◽  
Mineral Assemblage ◽  
Geophysical Data ◽  
Density Difference ◽  
Depth Range ◽  
Density Measurements ◽  
Mantle Composition

The observed density distribution of the lower mantle is compared with density measurements of the (M g,Fe)SiO 3 perovskite and (Mg,Fe)O magnesiowtistite highpressure phases as functions of pressure, tem perature and composition. We find that for plausible bounds on the composition of the upper mantle (ratio of magnesium to iron + magnesium components x M g ^ 0.88) and the temperature in the lower mantle ( T ^ 2000 K), the high-pressure mineral assemblage of upper-mantle composition is at least 2 .6 ( ± 1 ) % less dense than the lower m antle over the depth range 1000-2000 km. Thus, we find that a model of uniform m antle composition is incompatible with the existing mineralogical and geophysical data. Instead, we expect that the mantle is stratified, with the upper and lower m antle convecting separately, and we estimate that the compositional density difference between these regions is about 5 ( + 2) %. The stratification may not be perfect (‘leaky layering’), but significant intermixing and homogenization of the upper and lower m antle over geological timescales are precluded.

High temperature in the upper mantle beneath Cape Verde as a possible cause for the oceanic lithosphere rejuvenation inferred from Rayleigh-wave phase-velocity measurements.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joana Carvalho ◽  
Raffaele Bonadio ◽  
Graça Silveira ◽  
Sergei Lebedev ◽  
Susana Custódio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Velocity ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Lower Mantle ◽  
Oceanic Lithosphere ◽  
Cape Verde ◽  
Seismic Velocities ◽  
Low Velocity ◽  
Period Range ◽  
Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity ◽  
Central Atlantic

<p>Cape Verde is an intraplate archipelago located in the Atlantic Ocean about 560 km west of Senegal, on top of a ~130 Ma sector of the African oceanic lithosphere. Until recently, due to the lack of broadband seismic stations, the upper-mantle structure beneath the islands was poorly known. In this study we used data from two temporary deployments across the archipelago, measuring the phase velocities of Rayleigh-waves fundamental-modes in a broad period range (8–250 s), by cross-correlating teleseismic earthquake data between pairs of stations. Deriving a robust average, phase-velocity curve for the Cape Verde region, we inverted it for a shear-wave velocity profile using non-linear gradient search.</p><p>Our results show anomalously low velocities of ∼4.2 km/s in the asthenosphere, indicating the presence of high temperatures and, eventually, partial melting. This temperature anomaly is probably responsible for the thermal rejuvenation of the oceanic lithosphere to an age as young as about 30 Ma, which we inferred from the comparison of seismic velocities beneath Cape Verde and the ones representing different ages in the Central Atlantic.</p><p>The present results, together with previously detected low-velocity anomalies in the lower mantle and relatively He-unradiogenic isotopic ratios, also suggest a hot plume deeply rooted in the lower mantle, as the origin of the Cape Verde hotspot.</p><p><span>The author</span><span>s</span><span> would like to acknowledge the financial support FCT through project</span> <span>UIDB/50019/2020</span> <span>– IDL</span><span> and FIRE project Ref. PTDC/GEO- GEO/1123/2014.</span></p>

Constraining dynamic models in North America using the static gravity field

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Reusen ◽  
Bart Root ◽  
Javier Fullea ◽  
Zdenek Martinec ◽  
Wouter van der Wal
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Anomaly ◽  
Gravity Field ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Lower Mantle ◽  
Mantle Convection ◽  
Dynamic Models ◽  
Gravity Anomalies ◽  
Mantle Flow ◽  
Seismic Velocities ◽  
Crust And Upper Mantle

<p>The negative anomaly present in the static gravity field near Hudson Bay bears striking resemblance to the area depressed by the Laurentide ice sheet during the Last Glacial Maximum, suggesting that it is at least partly due to Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA), but mantle convection and density anomalies in the crust and the upper mantle are also expected to contribute. At the moment, the contribution of GIA to this anomaly is still disputed. Estimates, which strongly depend on the viscosity of the mantle, range from 25 percent to more than 80 percent. Our objective is to find the contributions from GIA and mantle convection, after correcting for density anomalies in the topography, crust and upper mantle. The static gravity field has the potential to constrain the viscosity profile which is the most uncertain parameter in GIA and mantle convection models. A spectral method is used to transform 3D spherical density models of the crust into gravity anomalies. Density anomalies in the lithosphere are estimated so that isostatic compensation is reached at a depth of 300 km. The dynamic processes of mantle flow are corrected for before isostasy is assumed. Upper and lower mantle viscosities are varied so that the gravity anomaly predicted from the dynamic models matches the residual gravity anomaly. We consider uncertainties due to the crustal model, the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB), the conversion from seismic velocities to density and the ice history used in the GIA model. The best fit is found for lower mantle viscosities >10<sup>22</sup> Pa s.</p>

scholarly journals An investigation into the sensitivity of postglacial decay times to uncertainty in the adopted ice history

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Kuchar ◽  
Glenn Milne ◽  
Alexander Hill ◽  
Lev Tarasov ◽  
Maaria Nordman
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level ◽  
Decay Time ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Lower Mantle ◽  
Solution Space ◽  
Hudson Bay ◽  
James Bay ◽  
Mantle Viscosity ◽  
Viscosity Models ◽  
Decay Times

Abstract At the centers of previously glaciated regions such as Hudson Bay in Canada and the Gulf of Bothnia in Fennoscandia, it has been observed that the sea level history follows an exponential form and that the associated decay time is relatively insensitive to uncertainty in the ice loading history. We revisit the issue of decay time sensitivity by computing relative sea level histories for Richmond Gulf and James Bay in Hudson Bay and Ångerman River in Sweden for a suite of reconstructions of the North American and Fennoscandian Ice Sheets and Earth viscosity profiles. We find that while some Earth viscosity models do indeed show insensitivity in computed decay times to the ice history, this is not true in all cases. Moreover, we find that the location of the study site relative to the geometry of the ice sheet is an important factor in determining ice sensitivity, and based on our set of ice sheet reconstructions, conclude that the location of James Bay is not well-suited to a decay time analysis. We describe novel corrections to the RSL data to remove the effects associated with the spatial distribution of sea level indicators as well as for other signals unrelated to regional ice loading (ocean loading, rotation and global mean sea-level changes) and demonstrate that they can significantly affect the inference of viscosity structure. We performed a forward modelling analysis based on a commonly adopted 2-layer, sub-lithosphere viscosity structure to determine how the solution space of viscosity models changes with the input ice history at the three study sites. While the solution spaces depend on ice history, for both Richmond Gulf and Ångerman River there are regions of parameter space where solutions are common across all or most ice histories, indicating low ice load sensitivity for these mantle viscosity parameters. For example, in Richmond Gulf, upper mantle viscosity values of (0.3–0.5)x1021 Pa s and lower mantle viscosity values of (5–50)x1021 Pa s tend to satisfy the data constraint consistently for most ice histories considered in this study. Similarly, the Ångerman River solution spaces contain a solution with an upper mantle viscosity of 0.3 × 1021 Pa s and lower mantle viscosity values of (5–50)x1021 Pa s common to 9 of the 10 ice histories considered there. However, the dependence of the viscosity solution space on ice history suggests that joint estimation of ice and Earth parameters is the optimal approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document