The Need for Harmonized Estimates of Forest Biodiversity Indicators

Author(s):  
Susanne Winter ◽  
Ronald E. McRoberts ◽  
Gherardo Chirici ◽  
Annemarie Bastrup-Birk ◽  
Jacques Rondeux ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 2789
Author(s):  
Ulla Mörtberg ◽  
Xi-Lillian Pang ◽  
Rimgaudas Treinys ◽  
Renats Trubins ◽  
Gintautas Mozgeris

Intensified forestry can be seen as a solution to climate change mitigation and securing energy supply, increasing the production of forest bioenergy feedstock as a substitution for fossil fuels. However, it may come with detrimental impacts on forest biodiversity, especially related to older forests. The aim of this study was to assess the sustainability of intensified forestry from climate-energy and biodiversity perspectives, targeting forest bird species. For this purpose, we applied the Landscape simulation and Ecological Assessment (LEcA) tool to the study area of Lithuania, having high ambitions for renewables and high forest biodiversity. With LEcA, we simulated forest growth and management for 100 years with two forest management strategies: Business As Usual (BAU) and Intensive forestry (INT), the latter with the purpose to fulfil renewable energy goals. With both strategies, the biomass yields increased well above the yields of the reference year, while the biodiversity indicators related to forest bird habitat to different degrees show the opposite, with lower levels than for the reference year. Furthermore, Strategy INT resulted in small-to-no benefits in the long run concerning potential biomass harvesting, while substantially affecting the biodiversity indicators negatively. The model results have the potential to inform policy and forest management planning concerning several sustainability goals simultaneously.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat Sarginci ◽  
Péter Ódor ◽  
Inken Doerfler ◽  
Thomas Nagel ◽  
Yoan Paillet ◽  
...  

<p>Forests provide essential economic, social, cultural and environmental services. To be able to maintain the provision of these services, sustainable forest management (SFM) is a vital obligation. The maintenance of biodiversity, ranging from gene to ecosystem levels, is essential for functions and associated services, and it is one of the most important criterion for assessing sustainability in the Pan-European region. <br>Currently, the majority of SFM Criteria and Indicators focuses on attributes relative to tree species or to the whole forest. With reference to biodiversity conservation, this means that the collected information cannot fully assess whether forests are being managed sustainably. To understand the drivers of forest biodiversity and drive sustainable management, several taxonomic groups should be investigated, since they may respond differently to the same environmental pressures. However, up to now, broad multi-taxonomic analyses were mainly performed through reviews and meta-analyses which limit our holistic understanding on the effects of forest management on different facets of biodiversity. Recently, several research institutions took up the challenge of multi-taxonomic field sampling. These local efforts, however, have limited extrapolation power to infer trends at the European scale. It is high time to share, standardize and use existing multi-taxon data through a common platform to inform sound management and political decisions. Biodiversity indicators have also some potential to be used in evaluation of impact of forest management on soils and surface waters in terms of naturalness, degradation and reclamation.<br>We present the COST Action CA18207 “Biodiversity of Temperate forest Taxa Orienting Management Sustainability by Unifying Perspectives” (Bottoms-Up). It will gather the most comprehensive knowledge of European multitaxonomic forest biodiversity through the synergy of research groups that collected data locally in more than 2200 sampling units across approximately 300 sites covering nine different European forest types. For each sampling unit, information will be available on at least three taxonomic groups (vascular plants, fungi, lichens, birds and saproxylic beetles being the most represented) and on live stand structure and deadwood. Multi-taxon biodiversity will be associated with: (i) information on forest management based on observational studies at the coarse scale, and (ii) structural data deriving from forest manipulation experiments at the fine scale. </p><p>Specific objectives are:<br>• Developing a standardized platform of multi-taxon data;<br>• Establishing a network of forest sites with baseline information for future monitoring;<br>• Designing shared protocols for multi-taxon sampling;<br>• Assessing the relationships between multi-taxon biodiversity, structure and management;<br>• Creating a coordinated network of forest manipulation experiments;<br>• Evaluating indicators and thresholds of sustainability directly tested on biodiversity;<br>• Developing management guidelines defining sustainable management to be applied in forest certification and within protected areas.</p><p>The Action involves about 80 researchers and stakeholders from 29 countries and represents an outstanding opportunity to develop a strong network of collaboration for standardized broad-scale multitaxon studies in Europe.</p><p>Keywords:  Multi-taxon, Pan-European region, Sustainable Forest Management. </p><p> </p>


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinzhuo Wu ◽  
Wenshu Lin ◽  
Xuanyi Peng ◽  
Weiguo Liu

China is a country rich in diverse forest ecosystems due to the large span of the country, complex topography, and multiple climate regimes. In this paper, the basic information of forest resources in China was briefly introduced and the current state in the measurements of forest biodiversity and the establishment of forest biodiversity index systems in related studies were reviewed. The results showed that a lot of studies on forest biodiversity have been conducted mostly at landscape or stand level in China and the commonly used biodiversity indicators were identified and compared. Several comprehensive forest biodiversity index systems were proposed. However, there are still some problems during the construction of forest biodiversity assessment system. Due to the late establishment of biodiversity monitoring system in China, the availability of data that could be included in a forest biodiversity index system is limited, which hurdles the precise assessment of forest biodiversity. It is suggested to develop long-term monitoring stations and keep data recording consistently. Concerns should also be given to the construction of the framework of the forest biodiversity index system and the determination of the indicators’ weight. The results will provide reference for the establishment of national or regional forest biodiversity evaluation indicator systems in China.


1996 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Lust ◽  
L. Nachtergale

The  UNCED Convention on Biodiversity commits governments to report regularly on  the state of forest biodiversity. This includes the development of a system  of indicators. For indicators to be useful they should constitute a feedback  mechanism in the decision-making process. They should form a comprehensive  and integrated system.     Much of the discussions on possible forestry indicators revolve around the  identification of species-based and system-based indicators. The former  category includes the use of endangered or flagship species as well as  indicators of intraspecific variation. The latter category is intended to  cover measures of forest structure and composition, the use of vegetation  associations and ecological regionalizations, and measures of soil erosion or  nutrient loss. From those two long lists of biodiversity indicators, a short  list can be distilled, referring to the two major elements of the model  framework, viz. Drivers of Change and Attributes Inventoried and Monitored.      Despite the general objective of forest biodiversity conservation, it is  important to look closely at some of the current challenges that exists for  the future in forest management. In summary, changes in forestry practices  are heavily influenced by economic realities, particularly the supply/demands  variables. The shortage of information and knowledge implies that it will  take time and effort and many iterative revisions to improve and refine the  array of indicators that are required.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 464-484
Author(s):  
P.R. Neupane ◽  
A. Gauli ◽  
P. Mundhenk ◽  
M. Köhl

There is often a striking disconnect between communities that create biodiversity frameworks, set targets, and design monitoring system and those that actually implement them. This study aims to (i) develop an integrated (participatory) approach to contextualize available sets of biodiversity indicators to meet specific stakeholders' needs, and (ii) select high-performance and rewarding indicators for participatory forest biodiversity monitoring systems (PFBMS). We used a hierarchical characterization approach to biodiversity to create a global pool of indicators. Specialists then used a framework consisting of multi-tiered filters to select high performance and rewarding indicators from the pool applicable to PFBMS at province and forest management unit levels in Indonesia. Selected indicators are able to reflect changes taking place at various levels in the ecological hierarchy from landscape, habitat, to species level including complete ecosystem attributes, i.e., structural, functional, and compositional. The integrated approach combines the expert guidance and experience of professionals at province and local levels; ensures global-local connection; and follows the participatory approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document