An Example for the Tectonic Evolution of the Arabian Platform Margin (SE Anatolia) during Mesozoic and some Criticisms of the Previously Suggested Models

Author(s):  
Demir Altiner
10.1144/m54.5 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-103
Author(s):  
Andreas Scharf ◽  
Frank Mattern ◽  
Mohammed Al-Wardi ◽  
Gianluca Frijia ◽  
Daniel Moraetis ◽  
...  

AbstractThe tectonic evolution of the Oman Mountains as of the Neoproterozoic begins with a major extensional event, the Neoproterozoic Abu Mahara rifting. It was followed by the compressional Nabitah event, still during the Neoproterozoic, in Oman but possibly not in the study area. During the earliest Cambrian, the Jabal Akhdar area was affected by the Cadomian Orogeny, marked by NE--SW shortening. It is unclear, whether the Saih Hatat area was exposed to the Cadomian deformation, too. Still during the lower Cambrian, the Angudan Orogeny followed, characterized by NW--SE shortening. An episode of rifting affected the Saih Hatat area during the mid-Ordovician. During the mid-Carboniferous, both dome areas were deformed by tilting and large-scale open folding in the course of the ‘Hercynian’ event. As a consequence, a major unconformity formed. As another Late Paleozoic event, the Permian break-up of Pangaea and subsequent formation of the Hawasina ocean basin, are recorded in the Southeastern Oman Mountains. As a result, a passive margin formed which existed until the mid-Cretaceous, characterized by deposition of mostly shelfal carbonates. This interval of general tectonic quiescence was interrupted during the early Jurassic by uplift and tilting of the Arabian Platform. The platform collapsed during the late Cretaceous, related to the arrival of the obducted allochthonous nappes including the Semail Ophiolite, transforming the passive margin to an active margin.The Semail Ophiolite formed most likely above a subduction zone within the Neo-Tethys Ocean during the Cenomanian while parts of the Arabian Plate were subducted to the NE. Formation of oceanic lithosphere and SW-thrusting was broadly coeval, resulting in ophiolite obduction onto the Hawasina Basin. The Semail Ophiolite and the Hawasina rocks combined were thrust further onto the Arabian Plate. Their load created a foreland basin and forebulge within the Arabian Platform. Once the continental lithosphere of the Arabian Platform was forced into the subduction zone, a tear between the dense oceanic lithosphere and the buoyant continental lithosphere developed. This led to rapid uplift and exhumation of subducted continental lithosphere of the Saih Hatat area, while obduction was still going on, causing in multiple and intense folding/thrusting within the eastern Saih Hatat Dome. Exhumation of the Saih Hatat Dome was massive. The emplacement of the ophiolite was completed during the Campanian/Maastrichtian. For completeness, we also present alternative models for the developmental history of the Semail Ophiolite.Immediately after emplacement, the Arabian lithosphere underwent intense top-to-the-NE extensional shearing. Most of the Saih Hatat Dome was exhumed during the latest Cretaceous to Early Eocene, associated with major extensional shearing at its flanks. Further convergence during the late Eocene to Miocene resulted in exhumation of the Jabal Akhdar Dome and some gentle exhumation of the Saih Hatat Dome, shaping the present-day Southeastern Oman Mountains. In the coastal area, east and SE of the Saih Hatat Dome, some late Cretaceous to present-day uplift is evident by, e.g., uplifted marine terraces. The entire Oman Mountains are uplifting today, which is evident by the massive wadi incision into various rock units, including wadi deposits which may form overhangs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 140 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ercan Özcan ◽  
Ali Osman Yücel ◽  
Rita Catanzariti ◽  
Sibel Kayğılı ◽  
Aral I. Okay ◽  
...  

AbstractThe standard reconstruction of species of Orbitoides d’Orbigny into a single lineage during the late Santonian to the end of the Maastrichtian is based upon morphometric data from Western Europe. An irreversible increase in the size of the embryonic apparatus, and the formation of a greater number of epi-embryonic chamberlets (EPC) with time, is regarded as the main evolutionary trends used in species discrimination. However, data from Maastrichtian Orbitoides assemblages from Central Turkey and the Arabian Platform margin (Southeastern Turkey and Oman) are not consistent with this record. The Maastrichtian Besni Formation of the Arabian Platform margin in Southeastern Turkey yields invariably biconvex specimens, with small, tri- to quadrilocular embryons and a small number of EPC, comparable to late Campanian Orbitoides medius (d’Archiac). The upper Maastrichtian Taraklı Formation from the Sakarya Basin of Central Turkey contains two distinct, yet closely associated forms of Orbitoides, easily differentiated by both external and internal features. Flat to biconcave specimens possess a small, tri- to quadrilocular embryonic apparatus of Orbitoides medius-type and a small number of EPC, whereas biconvex specimens possess a large, predominantly bilocular embryonic apparatus, and were assigned to Orbitoides ex. interc. gruenbachensis Papp–apiculatus Schlumberger based on morphometry. The flat to biconcave specimens belong to a long overlooked species Orbitoides pamiri Meriç, originally described from the late Maastrichtian of the Tauride Mountains in SW Turkey. This species is herein interpreted to be an offshoot from the main Orbitoides lineage during the Maastrichtian, as are forms that we term Orbitoides ‘medius’, since they recall this species, yet are younger than normal occurrence with the accepted morphometrically defined lineage. The consistent correlation between the external and internal test features in O. pamiri implies that the shape of the test is not an ecophenotypic variation, but appears to be biologically controlled. We, therefore, postulate that more than one lineage of Orbitoides exists during the Maastrichtian, with a lineage that includes O. ‘medius’ and O. pamiri displaying retrograde evolutionary features.


GeoArabia ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 643-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Montenat ◽  
Pascal Barrier ◽  
Henri J. Soudet

ABSTRACT A major upper Aptian unconformity is recorded on the eastern Arabian Platform, between the lower Aptian Qishn limestone and the Albian Nahr Umr marls. The study of this hiatus, in the western homocline of the Haushi-Huqf Uplift (Eastern Central Oman) provides new data about the evolution of the eastern Arabian Platform during middle Cretaceous times. The limestones of the Qishn formed a shoaling sequence, mainly composed of matrix-rich, coarse-grained sediment with small rudistids and algal build-ups, that led to a subemergent environment. A third-order sequence is recognized in the Qishn platform carbonates, which is partitioned into three minor sequences. The Qishn carbonate was subjected to pre-lithification normal faulting. A thick ferrugineous crust (hardground) covered the top surface of the Qishn as well as the faultscarps before they were buried under the Albian Nahr Umr marls. The faults are dominantly NW-trending, SW-facing, normal faults. The significance of the faulting remains hypothetical. The syndiagenetic NW-SE normal faults may correspond to ‘en-echelon’ faults, combined with a sinistral movement of the Haushi-Nafun Fault (HNF). The HNF acted as a left-lateral, strike-slip fault during late Cretaceous, pre-Maastrichtian times. This movement possibly began earlier, during the late Aptian. It could be related to the dynamics of the eastern Arabian margin during the Cretaceous (Masirah transform margin). There are some indications testifying to the activity of the Masirah transform fault during the early-middle Cretaceous. The margin kinematics may be responsible for the reactivation of nearby large faults affecting the platform basement (for instance the HNF). A slight sinistral reactivation of the HNF may have induced the development of the Aptian NW-trending normal faults. Moreover, the occurrence of early Cretaceous strike-slip movements in the Arabian Platform have already been envisaged, at a plate-scale, as a consequence of the South Atlantic extension. On this assumption, the Aptian fault blocks may have resulted from the development of a sinistral transtension along the HNF.


2010 ◽  
Vol 341 (1) ◽  
pp. 305-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdelkarim Al Abdalla ◽  
Eric Barrier ◽  
Anis Matar ◽  
Carla Muller

2001 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Razin ◽  
Jean Roger ◽  
Chantal Bourdillon ◽  
Josep Serra-Kiel ◽  
Jean Philip ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Kuśmierek ◽  
Urszula Baran

Abstract The discrepant arrangement of the Carpathian nappes and syntectonic deposits of the Carpathian Foredeep reveals the oroclinal migration of the subduction direction of the platform margin during the Late Cenozoic. Formation of the nappes was induced by their detachment from disintegrated segments of the European Platform; the segments were shortened as a result of their vertical rotation in zones of compressional sutures. It finds expression in local occurrence of the backward vergence of folding against the generally forward vergence toward the Carpathian Foredeep. The precompressional configuration of sedimentation areas of particular nappes was reconstructed with application of the palinspastic method, on the basis of the hitherto undervalued model which emphasizes the influence of the subduction and differentiated morphology of the platform basement on the tectonic evolution of the fold and thrust belt. Superposition of the palaeogeographic representations and the present geometry of the orogen allows understanding of the impact of the magnitudes of tectonic displacements on the differentiation of the geological structure in the NE segment of the Carpathians. The differentiation has inspired different views of Polish and Ukrainian geologists on structural classification and evolution of the frontal thrusts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document