A Comment on Buchdahl’s ‘Conceptual Analysis and Scientific Theory In Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature (With Special Reference To Hegel’s Optics)’

Author(s):  
John J. Compton
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen Pfeiffer Flores ◽  
Anny Caroline Nolasco ◽  
Bianca da Nobrega Rogoski

Conceptual analysis is a methodological branch of scientific research. Most psychological concepts originated in ordinary language. Although a concept often changes when it becomes part of a scientific theory, analysis of its original logical functioning is a precondition for understanding and evaluating conceptual changes. In this study, we analyse the logical functioning of the concept of comprehension, using techniques of Ordinary Language Philosophy. We present as central logical characteristics of the concept: (1) comprehension is an achievement concept; (2) there can be different degrees of comprehension; (3) comprehension is a polymorphous concept and (4) it is a dispositional concept. We discuss the methodological and theoretical implications of this analysis for narrative comprehension and illustrate them with a proposal for assessment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (27) ◽  
pp. 47-73
Author(s):  
Душан Миленковић

In this paper, the thought of the Austrian-born theorist Alfred Schutz, presented in the articles published in the first volume of his collected papers, is examined from the perspective of the role that Edmund Husserl’s phenomenological attitude plays in it. Advocating the importance of analyzing the structure of the world of everyday life in his phenomenology of the natural attitude, Schutz uses various aspects of Husserl’s phenomenology, without paying special attention to the phenomenological attitude itself. Therefore, the paper discusses the extent to which Schitz’s understanding of the natural attitude and its world depends on this concept of Husserl’s philosophy, with special reference to Shutz’s theory in his article “On Multiple Realities”. After showing that Husserl’s phenomenological attitude cannot be compared to the “attitude of scientific theory” discussed in the article on multiple realities, the paper additionally analyzes the absence of the phenomenological attitude in Schutz’s thought while turning to Maurice Natanson’s critique of Schutz’s theory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document