Summary of Discussions on Ocean Surface Heat Flux

1984 ◽  
pp. 269-272
Author(s):  
W. G. Large
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Surface Heat Flux ◽  
Ocean Surface ◽  
Surface Heat

scholarly journals Uncertainty in Net Surface Heat Flux due to Differences in Commonly Used Albedo Products

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 303-315
Author(s):  
Allison Hogikyan ◽  
Meghan F. Cronin ◽  
Dongxiao Zhang ◽  
Seiji Kato
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Solar Radiation ◽  
Surface Heat Flux ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Ocean Surface ◽  
Surface Heat ◽  
Surface Energy Budget ◽  
Spatiotemporal Variability ◽  
Shortwave Radiation

AbstractThe ocean surface albedo is responsible for the distribution of solar (shortwave) radiant energy between the atmosphere and ocean and therefore is a key parameter in Earth’s surface energy budget. In situ ocean observations typically do not measure upward reflected solar radiation, which is necessary to compute net solar radiation into the ocean. Instead, the upward component is computed from the measured downward component using an albedo estimate. At two NOAA Ocean Climate Station buoy sites in the North Pacific, the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) monthly climatological albedo has been used, while for the NOAA Global Tropical Buoy Array a constant albedo is used. This constant albedo is also used in the Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Response Experiment (COARE) bulk flux algorithm. This study considers the impacts of using the more recently available NASA Cloud and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) albedo product for these ocean surface heat flux products. Differences between albedo estimates in global satellite products like these imply uncertainty in the net surface solar radiation heat flux estimates that locally exceed the target uncertainty of 1.0 W m−2 for the global mean, set by the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Albedo has large spatiotemporal variability on hourly, monthly, and interannual time scales. Biases in high-resolution SWnet (the difference between surface downwelling and upwelling shortwave radiation) can arise if the albedo diurnal cycle is unresolved. As a result, for periods when satellite albedo data are not available it is recommended that an hourly climatology be used when computing high-resolution net surface shortwave radiation.

Analysis of significant measures for thermal conductivity

2020 ◽  
pp. 35-42
Author(s):  
Yuri P. Zarichnyak ◽  
Vyacheslav P. Khodunkov
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Conductivity ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Surface Heat Flux ◽  
Heat Flux Density ◽  
Measurement Method ◽  
Conductivity Measurement ◽  
Surface Heat ◽  
Measuring Instrument ◽  
New Class ◽  
Achievable Accuracy

The analysis of a new class of measuring instrument for heat quantities based on the use of multi-valued measures of heat conductivity of solids. For example, measuring thermal conductivity of solids shown the fallacy of the proposed approach and the illegality of the use of the principle of ambiguity to intensive thermal quantities. As a proof of the error of the approach, the relations for the thermal conductivities of the component elements of a heat pump that implements a multi-valued measure of thermal conductivity are given, and the limiting cases are considered. In two ways, it is established that the thermal conductivity of the specified measure does not depend on the value of the supplied heat flow. It is shown that the declared accuracy of the thermal conductivity measurement method does not correspond to the actual achievable accuracy values and the standard for the unit of surface heat flux density GET 172-2016. The estimation of the currently achievable accuracy of measuring the thermal conductivity of solids is given. The directions of further research and possible solutions to the problem are given.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document