Analysis Idealization Control for Composite Materials with Nonlinear Behavior

Author(s):  
M. S. Shephard ◽  
M. W. Beall
1985 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 1267-1270 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Christensen

Fiber-reinforced composite materials offer considerable performance advantages over conventional materials. New fiber developments place a premium upon understanding the mechanical interactions between phases in order to optimize the composition. Of particular importance are the means of quantifying damage states and predicting nonlinear behavior. Special attention is given to such areas as damage/failure/life prediction, environmental effects, nondestructive evaluation, interface conditions, and data base generation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara S. Underwood ◽  
Janette J. Meyer ◽  
Douglas E. Adams

Subsurface damage in composite materials is difficult to detect using visual techniques, and other current inspection methods lack the ability to perform quick, wide-area inspections without the need for reference signatures or baseline measurements. This paper presents a method for detecting and locating subsurface damage in composite materials without historical reference measurements by considering the nonlinear behavior of the material in the vicinity of damage. Nonlinear behavior is identified by comparing frequency response functions measured at different input amplitudes. It will be shown that the nonlinear behavior of the material is most evident in the areas nearest to the damage. The proposed inspection method is demonstrated both analytically and experimentally. First, a finite element model of a sandwich beam is developed using Bernoulli–Euler beam elements to represent each layer of the beam and springs to represent the interface between the layers. A bilinear stiffness nonlinearity is simulated to represent disbond damage between the top and core layers of the beam. The simulated disbond damage is localized by identifying degrees of freedom which indicate significant nonlinear response through a comparison of frequency response functions measured at various input amplitudes. Next, the method is demonstrated experimentally by identifying disbond damage in a fiberglass sandwich panel. A three-dimensional scanning laser vibrometer is used to measure the forced frequency response of the panel in its damaged state as it is excited at two or more amplitudes of excitation by a piezoelectric actuator. Comparisons of the frequency response functions measured at different input amplitudes show that the subsurface damage introduces nonlinear behavior which resembles a bilinear stiffness nonlinearity, and the differences in the frequency response functions are largest in the vicinity of the damage location. In addition, it was found that improved localization of the damage is achieved by investigating the response at higher frequencies. This work has application as a nondestructive method for detecting and locating subsurface damage in composite materials and, by using a laser vibrometer for noncontact measurement, allows for quick, wide-area inspection of composite materials without the need for reference signatures or baseline measurements.


Author(s):  
R.R. Russell

Transmission electron microscopy of metallic/intermetallic composite materials is most challenging since the microscopist typically has great difficulty preparing specimens with uniform electron thin areas in adjacent phases. The application of ion milling for thinning foils from such materials has been quite effective. Although composite specimens prepared by ion milling have yielded much microstructural information, this technique has some inherent drawbacks such as the possible generation of ion damage near sample surfaces.


Author(s):  
K.P.D. Lagerlof

Although most materials contain more than one phase, and thus are multiphase materials, the definition of composite materials is commonly used to describe those materials containing more than one phase deliberately added to obtain certain desired physical properties. Composite materials are often classified according to their application, i.e. structural composites and electronic composites, but may also be classified according to the type of compounds making up the composite, i.e. metal/ceramic, ceramic/ceramie and metal/semiconductor composites. For structural composites it is also common to refer to the type of structural reinforcement; whisker-reinforced, fiber-reinforced, or particulate reinforced composites [1-4].For all types of composite materials, it is of fundamental importance to understand the relationship between the microstructure and the observed physical properties, and it is therefore vital to properly characterize the microstructure. The interfaces separating the different phases comprising the composite are of particular interest to understand. In structural composites the interface is often the weakest part, where fracture will nucleate, and in electronic composites structural defects at or near the interface will affect the critical electronic properties.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document