Whey Protein Recovery and Whey Protein Fractionation

1992 ◽  
pp. 271-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. John Pearce
Author(s):  
Laetitia M. Bonnaillie ◽  
Peggy M. Tomasula

1974 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 793-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.L. Richter ◽  
C.V. Morr ◽  
G.A. Reineccius

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mina Kim ◽  
Sang-Hee Lee ◽  
Jiho Min ◽  
Fumihisa Kobayashi ◽  
Hyun-Ju Um ◽  
...  

One of the main challenges in proteomics lies in obtaining a high level of reproducible fractionation of the protein samples. Automated two-dimensional liquid phase fractionation (PF2D) system manufactured by Beckman Coulter provides a process well suited for proteome studies. However, the protein recovery efficiency of such system is low when a protocol recommended by the manufacturer is used for metaproteome profiling of environmental sample. In search of an alternative method that can overcome existing limitations, this study replaced manufacturer's buffers with Triton X-100 during the PF2D evaluation ofEscherichia coliK12. Three different Triton X-100 concentrations—0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.2%—were used for the first-dimension protein profiling. As the first-dimension result was at its best in the presence of 0.15% Triton X-100, second-dimension protein fractionation was performed using 0.15% Triton X-100 and the standard buffers. When 0.15% Triton X-100 was used, protein recovery increased as much as tenfold. The elution reliability of 0.15% Triton X-100 determined with ribonuclease A, insulin,α-lactalbumin, trypsin inhibitor, and cholecystokinin (CCK) affirmed Triton X-100 at 15% can outperform the standard buffers without having adverse effects on samples. This novel use of 0.15% Triton X-100 for PF2D can lead to greater research possibilities in the field of proteomics.


2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 1501-1511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayyada M. H. El-Sayed ◽  
Howard A. Chase

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document