Design Process Modeling of Process Planning for Flexible Lines Based on Conceptual Graphs and Design Rules. Applied to Cylinder Head Machining

2002 ◽  
pp. 313-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaud Lefebvre ◽  
Laurent Sabourin ◽  
Grigore Gogu ◽  
Jean Renaud
Keyword(s):  
Design Process ◽  
Process Planning ◽  
Process Modeling ◽  
Cylinder Head ◽  
Conceptual Graphs ◽  
Design Rules ◽  
Design Process Modeling

Functional Evaluation Based on Function Content

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiki Shimomura ◽  
Sadao Tanigawa ◽  
Hideaki Takeda ◽  
Yasushi Umeda ◽  
Tetsuo Tomiyama
Keyword(s):  
Design Process ◽  
Process Modeling ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Function Evaluation ◽  
Functional Evaluation ◽  
Object Modeling ◽  
Design Object ◽  
Design Process Modeling ◽  
And Function ◽  
Integrate Design

Abstract Function is a key concept to integrate design object modeling and design process modeling in design. We here propose the FEP (Functional Evolution Process) model in order to integrate design object modeling and design process modeling. In the FEP model, the model of a design object is evolved through three steps, i.e., function description, function actualization and function evaluation. Function description is the step in which a designer modifies required functions of a design object. Function actualization depicts a process to obtain physical descriptions from functional description. Function evaluation is a process to measure realizability of functions of the design object. However, among other steps, how to treat the function evaluation is one of the most important theme, because evaluation executed by designers is based on subjective, ambiguous and tacit standards. We discuss a methodology for evaluating function and propose the function content that quantifies functions and enables evaluation of functions. The function content is a similar concept of Shannon’s information content and we show an example of functional optimization based on this scheme.

Toward a Reasoning Framework of Design As Synthesis

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaharu Yoshioka ◽  
Tetsuo Tomiyama
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Design Process ◽  
Process Modeling ◽  
Implementation Strategy ◽  
Multiple Model ◽  
Hypothetical Reasoning ◽  
Design Processes ◽  
Design Process Modeling ◽  
Do So

Abstract Most of the previous research efforts for design process modeling had such assumptions as “design as problem solving,” “design as decision making,” and “design by analysis,” and did not explicitly address “design as synthesis.” These views lack notion and understanding about synthesis. Compared with analysis, synthesis is less understood and clarified. This paper discusses our fundamental view on synthesis and approach toward a reasoning framework of design as synthesis. To do so, we observe the designer’s activity and formalize knowledge operations in design processes. From the observation, we propose a hypothetical reasoning framework of design based on multiple model-based reasoning. We discuss the implementation strategy for the framework.

Tool and Information Centric Design Process Modeling

2012 ◽  
pp. 1613-1637
Author(s):  
William Stuart Miller ◽  
Joshua D. Summers
Keyword(s):  
Design Process ◽  
Process Modeling ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Research Effort ◽  
Case Study Research ◽  
Process Models ◽  
Design Processes ◽  
Modeling Approach ◽  
Nature Of Information ◽  
Design Process Modeling

A new design process modeling approach focused on the information flow through design tools is discussed in this chapter. This approach is applied to three long term mechanical engineering design projects spanning 24 months, 12 months, and 4 months. These projects are used to explore the development of the new modeling approach. This is a first step in a broader effort in 1) modeling of design processes, 2) establishing case study research as a formal approach to design research, and 3) developing new design process tools. The ability of engineers to understand the dynamic nature of information throughout the design processes is critical to their ability to complete these tasks. Such understanding promotes learning and further exploration of the design process allowing the improvement of process models, the establishment of new research approaches, and the development of new tools. Thus, enhancing this understanding is the goal of this research effort.

scholarly journals Concept of Product Complexity Modeling in the Development of a Machine Shaft

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-98
Author(s):  
Jerzy Pokojski ◽  
Łukasz Woźnicki
Keyword(s):  
Design Process ◽  
Process Modeling ◽  
Process Models ◽  
Detailed Structure ◽  
Product Complexity ◽  
Speed Reducer ◽  
Design Process Modeling ◽  
Product And Process ◽  
Paper Product

AbstractIn the paper product and design process modeling on the basis of speed reducer is presented. The paper proposes to build the product and process models and parallel to that carry out the project activities as these models reflect the detailed structure of the projects.The most important feature of the proposed approach is its possibility to model only important parts of the models and to keep track of the development of their chronological paths. The approach may be treated as a partial CPM/MOKA model or as network-integrated CPM/MOKA models.

Design Process Modeling with BCA Green Mark

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shen Lijun ◽  
◽  
Chua David K.H. ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Design Process ◽  
Process Modeling ◽  
Design Process Modeling

Design Rules for Additive Manufacturing: A Categorization

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahesh Mani ◽  
Paul Witherell ◽  
Haeseong Jee
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
New Product Development ◽  
Design Process ◽  
Process Planning ◽  
New Product ◽  
Industrial Applications ◽  
Design Rules ◽  
Geometrical Characteristics ◽  
Am Processes ◽  
Design For Am

Additive manufacturing (AM) is gaining popularity in industrial applications including new product development, functional parts, and tooling. However, due to the differences in AM technologies, processes, and process implementations, functional and geometrical characteristics of manufactured parts can vary dramatically. Planning, especially selecting the appropriate AM process and material requirements can be rather involved. Manufacturability using AM processes has been well studied; however, gaps exist in the design process when catering to the needs of manufacturability. Designers today are challenged with a lack of understanding of AM capabilities, process-related constraints, and their effects on the final product. Challenges are compounded by the ambiguity of where design for AM ends and process planning begins. These ambiguities can be addressed through design principles and corresponding design rules for additively manufacturing parts. The purpose of this paper is to categorically present relevant and reported efforts in design and process planning with design rules in AM. The overarching goal of the review is to offer insights to extract and categorize fundamental principles for derivative rules for different AM processes. Identifying such fundamental requirements could potentially lead to breakthroughs in design and process planning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document