Does Environmental Regulation Affect on Outside of the Regulated Areas? Empirical Analysis of Japanese Automobile NOx-PM Act

Author(s):  
Toshi H. Arimura ◽  
Kazuyuki Iwata
2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armando Sanchez-Vargas ◽  
Ricardo Mansilla-Sanchez ◽  
Alonso Aguilar-Ibarra

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-34
Author(s):  
Pengfei Zhou ◽  
Qiao Fan ◽  
Jia Zhu

AbstractIn recent years, China’s environmental pollution is serious, manufacturing industry has become one of the main targets of government environmental regulation. This paper uses the SBM model to calculate efficiency value of 29 manufacturing industries from 2008 to 2017. The results show that the overall performance of environmental regulation in manufacturing industry is high (the average efficiency value is 0.7806), but it shows a declining trend. The efficiency of environmental regulation also varies widely. The government should consider focusing on the 11 industries with low SBM value in the next step to improve the performance of environmental regulation.


Author(s):  
Xiang Deng ◽  
Li Li

Today, environmental protection has become a global issue, and various environmental regulations have been actively adopted. However, are these measures promoting or harming enterprise values? Is this effect the same for enterprises with different ownership backgrounds? In order to address these problems, we conducted an empirical analysis of China’s A-share market to investigate the relationship between the New Environmental Protection Law (NEPL) launched in China and corporate financial performance, and further explore the impact of environmental supervision intensity (ESI) from the perspective of ownership. The empirical results show that there is a negative correlation between NEPL and the financial performance of high pollution enterprises. Further analysis demonstrates that there is an inverted U-shape relationship between ESI and corporate financial performance for both state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs), while the financial performance of SOEs is more sensitive and tolerant to environmental regulation than that of non-SOEs. Finally, we make recommendations for the future direction of China’s ecological civilization construction and sustainable development of enterprises based on three aspects: environmental awareness, policy considerations, and sustainable development. The innovation of this paper lies in putting NEPL and corporate financial performance in the same analytical framework for the first time, which enriches the research in this field. Meanwhile, it provides a new perspective for understanding the relationship between ESI and corporate financial performance through the analysis of nonlinearity and owner heterogeneity.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1010-1012 ◽  
pp. 1989-1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Lin Wu ◽  
Xue Qian Li ◽  
Mei Ling Liu

In this paper, Chinese manufacturing industry is studied. We use the 2003-2010 panel data to analysis the impact of environmental regulation on the industrial innovation. In three cases of no time lag, one year later and two year later, all empirical results show that: the environmental regulation does not promote our country manufacturing industry to promote industrial innovation capacity.


Author(s):  
Susmita Dasgupta ◽  
David Wheeler ◽  
Ashoka Mody ◽  
Subhendu Roy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document