China and Latin America: New Cooperation in New Era

2021 ◽  
pp. 17-30
Author(s):  
Jingting Zhang ◽  
Guilong Shen
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Stella Krepp

Until the mid-1960s, Brazil played a leading role in inter-American affairs and the same holds true for its engagement with the non-aligned movement. This chapter attempts to shed light on the Brazilian role at the two non-aligned conferences in Belgrade 1961 and Cairo 1964. While only three years apart, the two conferences highlight two very distinctive experiences for Brazil and Latin America as a whole. In 1961, Brazilian politics teemed with reformist aspirations and expectations and this translated into a new attitude towards the emerging third world. Under the Quadros and later the Goulart government, Brazil followed an “independent foreign policy” and strengthened ties with both the socialist and decolonized countries, and participating in the non-aligned movement formed part of this new nexus of relationships. By 1964, however, this trend had been reversed, as a military coup in Brazil ushered in a new era in domestic and foreign policies.


1993 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 409-419
Author(s):  
Beatrice Heuser

The last fifty years were bloody and dismal for many war-torn regions of the world. The end of the Second World War ushered in a new era of local and ‘limited’ wars throughout Asia, Africa and Latin America. Hardly a day went by without a war, civil or international, claiming its victims somewhere on our planet. Yet Europe experienced a ‘Long Peace’ (J. L. Gaddis). The direct confrontation of the superpowers, the Soviet and US tanks on either side of the inner German border, immunized Europe from the plague of war. In the great wrestling match between East and West, Europe was the prime prize, and too much was at stake for all sides to allow any wars, even minor wars, to erupt anywhere on this continent.1


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 237
Author(s):  
Jose Antonio Veiga Sanhudo ◽  
Marco Túlio Costa

Caros leitores, durante os últimos anos a diretoria da ABTPé e os membros do corpo editorial da revista vêm trabalhando arduamente com intuito de aprimorar o nosso periódico. Recentemente, recebemos a ajuda e apoio dos amigos da América Latina, Portugal e Espanha.​Com o objetivo principal de obter indexação em bases de dados científicas renomadas e também de diminuir os custos de produção, a diretoria da ABTPé em conjunto com todo o corpo editorial da revista e parceiros da América Latina e região Ibérica iniciaram no ano passado um processo de fusão dos periódicos.​Em janeiro de 2020 esta modificação estará concluída e a nossa revista passará a ser mais abrangente, mais forte e com mais chances de aprovação em novas bases de dados científicas. Esse processo exigiu mudanças em todo o corpo editorial, que foram finalizadas durante o mês de dezembro. O Prof. Dr. Alexandre Leme Godoy-Santos foi nomeado o novo Editor Chefe da revista e a composição do Corpo Editorial foi construída com todos os países envolvidos.Essa é uma ação estratégica para o Brasil - ABTPé - e para a Região - FLAMECIPP, no posicionamento global. E um avanço na parceria com Portugal e Espanha.​Agradecemos o excepcional trabalho realizado pelo Dr. Jorge Mitsuo Mizusaki e sua equipe que impulsionaram a revista.   Nosso reconhecimento a confiança e ao apoio fundamental do Conselho Editorial (2007-2019) representado pelo Prof. Dr. Manlio Mario Marco Napoli, Prof. Dr. Osny Salomão, Prof. Dr. Sérgio Bruschini, Prof. Dr. Roberto Santin e Dr. Egydio de Carvalho, que entenderam que a evolução da revista passa pela maior visibilidade internacional.   Desejamos sucesso a nova equipe, com votos de um excelente trabalho para levar a nova revista a patamares ainda mais altos.   Novo corpo editorial: Alexandre Leme Godoy-Santos - BrasilCristian Ortiz - ChileDaniel Baumfeld - BrasilGabriel Khazen - VenezuelaLuis Hermida - MexicoMarcelo Pires Prado - BrasilMarco Túlio Costa - BrasilMario Herrera - EspanhaPablo Sotelano - ArgentinaPaulo Felicíssimo - PortugalSantiago Guerrero - Colômbia 


2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
The Editors

buy this issueIn the last several years, the left has experienced a series of defeats, and the grip of capital has tightened. The recent reversals in Latin America are a warning. We live in an age where a new era of revolutionary social change, unlike any that came before it, is the only hope—not just for ourselves, but for the chain of human generations.Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the Monthly Review website.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 392-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clive S. Thomas ◽  
Kristina Klimovich

2015 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 133-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shixue Jiang

Before China's current leadership was established at the 18th Congress of the Communist Party of China in November 2012, China's relations with Latin America had already been proceeding rapidly and steadily. The way the new Chinese leadership is promoting the bilateral relationship reflects China's increasing engagement with both developed and developing countries, aiming to generate win-win results on the basis of creating and consolidating various partnerships. In the new era, with a new partnership, a new road map, and a new forum, China-Latin America relations are expected to proceed with greater momentum. In the meantime, there will be new problems and challenges to tackle in order to realize the many visions and resolves of leaders on both sides.


Civilizar ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (31) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Hesheng

With the steady growth of economic globalization and global governance of international affairs, the relationship between China and Latin America has demonstrated a stable and rapid development trend. In the new era, China and Latin America should strengthen their ties in the theme of “peace and development”, establish a community of common destiny and build a cooperative community win-win community for common development, so as to form an invincible community of common culture. Though the relations between China and Latin America (SinoLATAM) face a series of internal and external contradictions, it is necessary to see the wide perspectives that are behind the above mentioned contradictions in order to promote the steady development of bilateral and multilateral relations, deepen political trust, expand areas of economic and commercial cooperation, increase the reciprocity of win-win and lay a solid foundation for the global development of China and Latin America.


Author(s):  
Robert Jordan

First utilized in Latin America in response to the mid-20th-century decline of populist economic policymaking in the region, modern neoclassical theory, or neoliberalism, can be generally defined as a market-oriented form of economy policymaking that seeks to decentralize state authority and redefine state administrative responsibilities through deregulation, privatization, and the creation of common markets. Based on principles of classical 19th-century economic liberalism, the economic and political framework of neoliberalism advocates for a dramatically limited role for the state, which should only act to maintain the integrity of contract law and private property as a means of supporting the market. In the absence of state intervention, neoliberalism in Latin America alternatively emphasized the role of multilateral organizations, such as the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, Inter-American Development Bank, and the U.S. Agency for International Development in bringing financial stability and growth to the region through the manipulation of interest rates, the devaluation of exchange rates, and the establishment of free-market pricing of goods. Ultimately, the widespread implementation of neoliberal reforms through the 1980s and 1990s ushered in a new era of transnational economic policymaking that had long-term, mixed results for the environmental, political, and social landscape of Latin America.


2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (01) ◽  
pp. 102-129
Author(s):  
ALBERTO MARTÍN ÁLVAREZ ◽  
EUDALD CORTINA ORERO

AbstractUsing interviews with former militants and previously unpublished documents, this article traces the genesis and internal dynamics of the Ejército Revolucionario del Pueblo (People's Revolutionary Army, ERP) in El Salvador during the early years of its existence (1970–6). This period was marked by the inability of the ERP to maintain internal coherence or any consensus on revolutionary strategy, which led to a series of splits and internal fights over control of the organisation. The evidence marshalled in this case study sheds new light on the origins of the armed Salvadorean Left and thus contributes to a wider understanding of the processes of formation and internal dynamics of armed left-wing groups that emerged from the 1960s onwards in Latin America.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document