A framework for environmental management planning ? A landscape-ecological approach

1989 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiko Takeuchi ◽  
Dong-Kun Lee
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Ecological Approach ◽  
Management Planning ◽  
Landscape Ecological

Landscape-Ecological Approach in Identifying Distribution Patterns of Pollutants Within the Lake Baikal Drainage Basin

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-143
Author(s):  
M. Yu. Semenov ◽  
Yu. M. Semenov ◽  
V. A. Snytko ◽  
A. V. Silaev
Keyword(s):  
Lake Baikal ◽  
Drainage Basin ◽  
Distribution Patterns ◽  
Ecological Approach ◽  
Landscape Ecological

Sustainable Development of IT Industry in Taiwan

2011 ◽  
Vol 255-260 ◽  
pp. 2111-2115
Author(s):  
Yi Chun Chen ◽  
Debby Chang ◽  
Chiung En Huang
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Ecological Approach ◽  
Sustainable Business ◽  
It Industry ◽  
Doing Business

During the last two decades, many approaches to corporate and industrial environmental management as well as tools and sustainability programmes have been created and implemented. Sustainable business is business that is rewarding in economic, social and ecological approach people creating these new ways of doing business [1].

scholarly journals The landscape ecological approach in bird conservation: integrating the metapopulation concept into spatial planning

Ibis ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. S139-S146 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAUL OPDAM ◽  
RUUD FOPPEN ◽  
RIEN REIJNEN ◽  
ALEX SCHOTMAN
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Ecological Approach ◽  
Bird Conservation ◽  
Landscape Ecological

scholarly journals Positional-dynamic territorial structure of the urban landscape

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 539-549
Author(s):  
Anastasia A. Klieshch ◽  
Nadiya V. Maksymenko
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Urban Landscape ◽  
Dynamic Structure ◽  
Nature Management ◽  
Lateral Migration ◽  
Ecological Planning ◽  
Raster Calculator ◽  
Territorial Structure ◽  
Dynamic Landscape ◽  
Landscape Ecological

The knowledge of landscapes’ positional - dynamic structure enabled us to include it in the work on urban landscape and ecological planning, with its ownspecifics as environmental management objects. The aim is to create cartographic models of a positional-dynamic territorial structure of Kharkiv landscape to ensure a balanced use of nature in environmental management. Methods: a positional-dynamic structure of urban landscape was selected by compiling andanalyzing cartographic works of landscape strips, tiers and districts. Territorial configuration of different types of landscape strips were identified and established based on the classical scheme of landscape locations typology by water-geochemical regime proposed by B. Polynov and supplemented by M. Glazovska, which includes 9 main types. Technically, synthesis of parameters combinations and determination of the territories affiliation to certain types of landscape strips was carried out using spatial analysis tools (in particular, reclassification and raster calculator) of initial data on morphometric relief parameters in ArcGIS. Results. A set of qualitative parameters is proposed, based on the characteristics of each type of landscape strips by which they can be identified.Composition and territorial configuration of positional-dynamic landscape strips of the urban landscape are established as a result of systematization and processing of geodata parametric features of the water-geochemical regime. Cartographic models of the positional-dynamic structureof Kharkiv landscapes have been developed, including 13 types of landscape strips with individual features united in 5 groups by types of lateral migration of substances due to the peculiarities of their positionality (common position in relation to frame lines of flow directions) and factors of relief morphology similarity, nature of income and intensity of substances transfer. The identified mode types and the nature of the spatial distribution of the corresponding landscape strips have been described in detail. Conclusions. Cartographic models of the positional-dynamic territorial structure of Kharkiv, developed during the inventory stage of landscape-ecological planning, make it possible to choose areas of balanced nature management of a particular area.

scholarly journals Land Use/Land Cover Mapping Using Geospatial Technology for Environmental Management

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 168-172
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Land Use ◽  
Land Cover ◽  
Spatial Information ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Land Use Land Cover ◽  
Land Resources ◽  
Visual Interpretation ◽  
Management Planning ◽  
Cropping Patterns

The aim of the attempt was to study the Land use/Land cover attributes for environmental management planning for socio economic growth of study area. Evaluation of Land Resources in given study area by Remote sensing and Geographic Information System (GIS) technologies help to generate the spatial information to study the current conditions deliberate to the past conditions data and estimate the future requirements. The IRS-P6 satellite Imagery and Survey of India toposheets data, visual interpretation technique, Arc/Info and Arc View GIS software’s are used to prepare the final Land use/Land cover information. This data is useful for environment and natural resources development management. This type of land information study helps to prepare the Land and water Resources Action plans for conservation of suitable cropping patterns, and improved productivity of the study area and to provide the primary requirements of farmers, to enhance their background conditions and help to develop or enhance decision makers for sustainable development

Influences of Engaging in a Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation Process on Stakeholder Perceptions of Key Performance Indicators for Trails

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Witkowski ◽  
Ryan Plummer ◽  
Garrett Hutson
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Stakeholder Participation ◽  
Ecological Integrity ◽  
Monitoring And Evaluation ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Stakeholder Perceptions ◽  
Participatory Monitoring ◽  
Management Planning ◽  
Trail Use

Trail use is growing globally. Managers confront the classic dilemma of protecting ecological integrity and providing enriching experiences. They concomitantly face the imperative for sustainability—contemporarily characterized by complexity, uncertainty, conflict, and change. Heightened levels of visitation are cause for immense concerns due to adverse impacts to the environment as well as visitor experiences. COVID-19 exacerbates these challenges as heightened levels of visitation are occurring, while managers simultaneously face decreases in conservation funding, and restrictions on protected area operations. Participatory monitoring and evaluation (PM&E) is an emerging in- novation to collaboratively address social-ecological challenges, such as issues as- sociated with trail use. This research is concerned with exploring the influences of engaging in a PM&E process on stakeholder perceptions of key performance indicators (KPIs) for trails. This study compares stakeholder perceptions of KPIs for trails before and after a PM&E workshop at the Niagara Glen Nature Reserve in Ontario, Canada. Results show that PM&E can facilitate consensus among stakeholders regarding the overall goals of management and associated KPIs for environmental management planning. Stakeholders were shown to experience a real change in their perceptions of KPIs. The PM&E process studied show that participants became more conscious of the wider social realities as well as their perceptions of trail management. The study has important implications for managers concerned with trails and sustainability, including building consensus among key stakeholders to reach management goals, enhancing localized decision making, and building capacity for management towards sustainability. Trails, as well as the wider community can ultimately benefit from participatory approaches to environmental management. Consensus-building through PM&E works to enhance decisions that account for a diversity of perspectives. Stakeholder participation in trail management increases the likelihood that local needs and priorities are met, while allowing stakeholders to build capacity and learn to effectively manage their environments. Furthermore, positive perceptions from being meaningfully involved in PM&E can ensure the support of constituents, which is imperative for the long-term success of management planning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document