The isolated N-terminal DNA binding domain of thec repressor of bacteriophage16-3 is functional in DNA binding in vivo and in vitro

1991 ◽  
Vol 227 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Géza Dallmann ◽  
Ferene Marines ◽  
Péter Papp ◽  
Miklós Gaszner ◽  
László Orosz
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain

Reconstitution of transcriptional activation domains by reiteration of short peptide segments reveals the modular organization of a glutamine-rich activation domain

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 6056-6067
Author(s):  
M Tanaka ◽  
W Herr
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Pou Domain

The POU domain activator Oct-2 contains an N-terminal glutamine-rich transcriptional activation domain. An 18-amino-acid segment (Q18III) from this region reconstituted a fully functional activation domain when tandemly reiterated and fused to either the Oct-2 or GAL4 DNA-binding domain. A minimal transcriptional activation domain likely requires three tandem Q18III segments, because one or two tandem Q18III segments displayed little activity, whereas three to five tandem segments were active and displayed increasing activity with increasing copy number. As with natural Oct-2 activation domains, in our assay a reiterated activation domain required a second homologous or heterologous activation domain to stimulate transcription effectively when fused to the Oct-2 POU domain. These results suggest that there are different levels of synergy within and among activation domains. Analysis of reiterated activation domains containing mutated Q18III segments revealed that leucines and glutamines, but not serines or threonines, are critical for activity in vivo. Curiously, several reiterated activation domains that were inactive in vivo were active in vitro, suggesting that there are significant functional differences in our in vivo and in vitro assays. Reiteration of a second 18-amino-acid segment from the Oct-2 glutamine-rich activation domain (Q18II) was also active, but its activity was DNA-binding domain specific, because it was active when fused to the GAL4 than to the Oct-2 DNA-binding domain. The ability of separate short peptide segments derived from a single transcriptional activation domain to activate transcription after tandem reiteration emphasizes the flexible and modular nature of a transcriptional activation domain.

scholarly journals Phosphorylation of BATF regulates DNA binding: a novel mechanism for AP-1 (activator protein-1) regulation

2003 ◽  
Vol 374 (2) ◽  
pp. 423-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher D. DEPPMANN ◽  
Tina M. THORNTON ◽  
Fransiscus E. UTAMA ◽  
Elizabeth J. TAPAROWSKY
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Leucine Zipper ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Activator Protein 1 ◽  
Basic Leucine Zipper ◽  
Activator Protein

BATF is a member of the AP-1 (activator protein-1) family of bZIP (basic leucine zipper) transcription factors that form transcriptionally inhibitory, DNA binding heterodimers with Jun proteins. In the present study, we demonstrate that BATF is phosphorylated in vivo on multiple serine and threonine residues and at least one tyrosine residue. Reverse-polarity PAGE revealed that serine-43 and threonine-48 within the DNA binding domain of BATF are phosphorylated. To model phosphorylation of the BATF DNA binding domain, serine-43 was replaced by an aspartate residue. BATF(S43D) retains the ability to dimerize with Jun proteins in vitro and in vivo, and the BATF(S43D):Jun heterodimer localizes properly to the nucleus of cells. Interestingly, BATF(S43D) functions like wild-type BATF to reduce AP-1-mediated gene transcription, despite the observed inability of the BATF(S43D):Jun heterodimer to bind DNA. These data demonstrate that phosphorylation of serine-43 converts BATF from a DNA binding into a non-DNA binding inhibitor of AP-1 activity. Given that 40% of mammalian bZIP transcription factors contain a residue analogous to serine-43 of BATF in their DNA binding domains, the phosphorylation event described here represents a mechanism that is potentially applicable to the regulation of many bZIP proteins.

Structure of the DNA-binding domain of the response regulator SaeR fromStaphylococcus aureus

2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (8) ◽  
pp. 1768-1776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaojiao Fan ◽  
Xu Zhang ◽  
Yuwei Zhu ◽  
Liwen Niu ◽  
Maikun Teng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Response Regulator ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Promoter Regions ◽  
Winged Helix

The SaeR/S two-component regulatory system is essential for controlling the expression of many virulence factors inStaphylococcus aureus. SaeR, a member of the OmpR/PhoB family, is a response regulator with an N-terminal regulatory domain and a C-terminal DNA-binding domain. In order to elucidate how SaeR binds to the promoter regions of target genes, the crystal structure of the DNA-binding domain of SaeR (SaeRDBD) was solved at 2.5 Å resolution. The structure reveals that SaeRDBDexists as a monomer and has the canonical winged helix–turn–helix module. EMSA experiments suggested that full-length SaeR can bind to the P1 promoter and that the binding affinity is higher than that of its C-terminal DNA-binding domain. Five key residues on the winged helix–turn–helix module were verified to be important for binding to the P1 promoterin vitroand for the physiological function of SaeRin vivo.

scholarly journals Regulation of the Myxococcus xanthus C-Signal-Dependent Ω4400 Promoter by the Essential Developmental Protein FruA

2006 ◽  
Vol 188 (14) ◽  
pp. 5167-5176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah R. Yoder-Himes ◽  
Lee Kroos
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Response Regulator ◽  
Myxococcus Xanthus ◽  
Cell Movement ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Consensus Binding Site ◽  
Multicellular Development

ABSTRACT The bacterium Myxococcus xanthus employs extracellular signals to coordinate aggregation and sporulation during multicellular development. Extracellular, contact-dependent signaling that involves the CsgA protein (called C-signaling) activates FruA, a putative response regulator that governs a branched signaling pathway inside cells. One branch regulates cell movement, leading to aggregation. The other branch regulates gene expression, leading to sporulation. C-signaling is required for full expression of most genes induced after 6 h into development, including the gene identified by Tn5 lac insertion Ω4400. To determine if FruA is a direct regulator of Ω4400 transcription, a combination of in vivo and in vitro experiments was performed. Ω4400 expression was abolished in a fruA mutant. The DNA-binding domain of FruA bound specifically to DNA upstream of the promoter −35 region in vitro. Mutations between bp −86 and −77 greatly reduced binding. One of these mutations had been shown previously to reduce Ω4400 expression in vivo and make it independent of C-signaling. For the first time, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments were performed on M. xanthus. The ChIP experiments demonstrated that FruA is associated with the Ω4400 promoter region late in development, even in the absence of C-signaling. Based on these results, we propose that FruA directly activates Ω4400 transcription to a moderate level prior to C-signaling and, in response to C-signaling, binds near bp −80 and activates transcription to a higher level. Also, the highly localized effects of mutations between bp −86 and −77 on DNA binding in vitro, together with recently published footprints, allow us to predict a consensus binding site of GTCG/CGA/G for the FruA DNA-binding domain.

scholarly journals Unbiased Mutagenesis of MHV68 LANA Reveals a DNA-Binding Domain Required for LANA Function In Vitro and In Vivo

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e1002906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clinton R. Paden ◽  
J. Craig Forrest ◽  
Scott A. Tibbetts ◽  
Samuel H. Speck
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain

scholarly journals Transcription Activation by the DNA-Binding Domain of the AraC Family Protein RhaS in the Absence of Its Effector-Binding Domain

2007 ◽  
Vol 189 (14) ◽  
pp. 4984-4993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason R. Wickstrum ◽  
Jeff M. Skredenske ◽  
Ana Kolin ◽  
Ding J. Jin ◽  
Jianwen Fang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcription Activation ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Dimerization Domain ◽  
Half Site

ABSTRACT The Escherichia coli l-rhamnose-responsive transcription activators RhaS and RhaR both consist of two domains, a C-terminal DNA-binding domain and an N-terminal dimerization domain. Both function as dimers and only activate transcription in the presence of l-rhamnose. Here, we examined the ability of the DNA-binding domains of RhaS (RhaS-CTD) and RhaR (RhaR-CTD) to bind to DNA and activate transcription. RhaS-CTD and RhaR-CTD were both shown by DNase I footprinting to be capable of binding specifically to the appropriate DNA sites. In vivo as well as in vitro transcription assays showed that RhaS-CTD could activate transcription to high levels, whereas RhaR-CTD was capable of only very low levels of transcription activation. As expected, RhaS-CTD did not require the presence of l-rhamnose to activate transcription. The upstream half-site at rhaBAD and the downstream half-site at rhaT were found to be the strongest of the known RhaS half-sites, and a new putative RhaS half-site with comparable strength to known sites was identified. Given that cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP), the second activator required for full rhaBAD expression, cannot activate rhaBAD expression in a ΔrhaS strain, it was of interest to test whether CRP could activate transcription in combination with RhaS-CTD. We found that RhaS-CTD allowed significant activation by CRP, both in vivo and in vitro, although full-length RhaS allowed somewhat greater CRP activation. We conclude that RhaS-CTD contains all of the determinants necessary for transcription activation by RhaS.

scholarly journals Effects of mutations within two hydrophilic regions of the bovine papillomavirus type 1 E1 DNA-binding domain on E1–E2 interaction

2001 ◽  
Vol 82 (10) ◽  
pp. 2341-2351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly J. Woytek ◽  
Dhandapani Rangasamy ◽  
Cynthia Bazaldua-Hernandez ◽  
Mike West ◽  
Van G. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Genome Replication ◽  
Bovine Papillomavirus ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Transactivation Domain ◽  
Recognition Element ◽  
C Terminus

The interaction between papillomavirus E1 and E2 proteins is essential for viral genome replication. Using both in vivo and in vitro assays to evaluate the regions of the two proteins necessary for the E1–E2 interaction, three independent interactions were identified for bovine papillomavirus E1: the N terminus of E1 (E1N, residues 1–311) interacts with the E2 transactivation domain (E2TAD) and the E2 DNA-binding domain (E2DBD) and the C terminus of E1 (E1C, residues 315–605) interacts with E2. Nine mutations within E1N were evaluated for their effects on E2 interaction. Five mutations eliminated interaction with the E2TAD; four of these were located within two previously identified conserved, hydrophilic regions, HR1 and HR3. Since HR1 and HR3 residues appear to comprise the origin of replication recognition element for E1, simultaneous interaction with the E2TAD during initiation complex formation would seem unlikely. Consistent with this inference is the fact that three of the five mutants defective for E2TAD binding exhibited wild-type levels of replication. The replication-positive phenotype of these mutants suggests that the E1N–E2TAD interaction is not essential for replication function and is probably involved in some other E1–E2 function, such as regulating transcription. Only one of the five mutations defective for E2TAD binding also prevented E2DBD interaction, indicating that the regions of E1N that interact with the E2TAD and the E2DBD are not identical. The ability of E1N to cooperatively interact with E2 bound to E2-binding site (E2BS) 11 versus E2BS12 was also examined, and cooperative binding was only observed when E2 was bound to E2BS12.

scholarly journals Functionally distinct roles for T and Tbx6 during mouse development

Biology Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. bio054692
Author(s):  
Amy K. Wehn ◽  
Deborah R. Farkas ◽  
Carly E. Sedlock ◽  
Dibya Subedi ◽  
Deborah L. Chapman
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Es Cells ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Mouse Development ◽  
T Box

ABSTRACTThe mouse T-box transcription factors T and Tbx6 are co-expressed in the primitive streak and have unique domains of expression; T is expressed in the notochord, while Tbx6 is expressed in the presomitic mesoderm. T-box factors are related through a shared DNA binding domain, the T-domain, and can therefore bind to similar DNA sequences at least in vitro. We investigated the functional similarities and differences of T and Tbx6 DNA binding and transcriptional activity in vitro and their interaction genetically in vivo. We show that at one target, Dll1, the T-domains of T and Tbx6 have different affinities for the binding sites present in the mesoderm enhancer. We further show using in vitro assays that T and Tbx6 differentially affect transcription with Tbx6 activating expression tenfold higher than T, that T and Tbx6 can compete at target gene enhancers, and that this competition requires a functional DNA binding domain. Next, we addressed whether T and Tbx6 can compete in vivo. First, we generated embryos that express Tbx6 at greater than wild-type levels embryos and show that these embryos have short tails, resembling the T heterozygous phenotype. Next, using the dominant-negative TWis allele, we show that Tbx6+/− TWis/+ embryos share similarities with embryos homozygous for the Tbx6 hypomorphic allele rib-vertebrae, specifically fusions of several ribs and malformation of some vertebrae. Finally, we tested whether Tbx6 can functionally replace T using a knockin approach, which resulted in severe T null-like phenotypes in chimeric embryos generated with ES cells heterozygous for a Tbx6 knockin at the T locus. Altogether, our results of differences in affinity for DNA binding sites and transcriptional activity for T and Tbx6 provide a potential mechanism for the failure of Tbx6 to functionally replace T and possible competition phenotypes in vivo.

scholarly journals Transcriptional repression by Msx-1 does not require homeodomain DNA-binding sites.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 861-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
K M Catron ◽  
H Zhang ◽  
S C Marshall ◽  
J A Inostroza ◽  
J M Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Homeodomain Protein ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Sites

This study investigates the transcriptional properties of Msx-1, a murine homeodomain protein which has been proposed to play a key role in regulating the differentiation and/or proliferation state of specific cell populations during embryogenesis. We show, using basal and activated transcription templates, that Msx-1 is a potent repressor of transcription and can function through both TATA-containing and TATA-less promoters. Moreover, repression in vivo and in vitro occurs in the absence of DNA-binding sites for the Msx-1 homeodomain. Utilizing a series of truncated Msx-1 polypeptides, we show that multiple regions of Msx-1 contribute to repression, and these are rich in alanine, glycine, and proline residues. When fused to a heterologous DNA-binding domain, both N- and C-terminal regions of Msx-1 retain repressor function, which is dependent upon the presence of the heterologous DNA-binding site. Moreover, a polypeptide consisting of the full-length Msx-1 fused to a heterologous DNA-binding domain is a more potent repressor than either the N- or C-terminal regions alone, and this fusion retains the ability to repress transcription in the absence of the heterologous DNA site. We further show that Msx-1 represses transcription in vitro in a purified reconstituted assay system and interacts with protein complexes composed of TBP and TFIIA (DA) and TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB (DAB) in gel retardation assays, suggesting that the mechanism of repression is mediated through interaction(s) with a component(s) of the core transcription complex. We speculate that the repressor function of Msx-1 is critical for its proposed role in embryogenesis as a regulator of cellular differentiation.

scholarly journals Crystal structure of the DNA binding domain of the transcription factor T-bet suggests simultaneous recognition of distant genome sites

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (43) ◽  
pp. E6572-E6581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ce Feng Liu ◽  
Gabriel S. Brandt ◽  
Quyen Q. Hoang ◽  
Natalia Naumova ◽  
Vanja Lazarevic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Quaternary Structure ◽  
Regulatory Element ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Chromosome Conformation

The transcription factor T-bet (Tbox protein expressed in T cells) is one of the master regulators of both the innate and adaptive immune responses. It plays a central role in T-cell lineage commitment, where it controls the TH1 response, and in gene regulation in plasma B-cells and dendritic cells. T-bet is a member of the Tbox family of transcription factors; however, T-bet coordinately regulates the expression of many more genes than other Tbox proteins. A central unresolved question is how T-bet is able to simultaneously recognize distant Tbox binding sites, which may be located thousands of base pairs away. We have determined the crystal structure of the Tbox DNA binding domain (DBD) of T-bet in complex with a palindromic DNA. The structure shows a quaternary structure in which the T-bet dimer has its DNA binding regions splayed far apart, making it impossible for a single dimer to bind both sites of the DNA palindrome. In contrast to most other Tbox proteins, a single T-bet DBD dimer binds simultaneously to identical half-sites on two independent DNA. A fluorescence-based assay confirms that T-bet dimers are able to bring two independent DNA molecules into close juxtaposition. Furthermore, chromosome conformation capture assays confirm that T-bet functions in the direct formation of chromatin loops in vitro and in vivo. The data are consistent with a looping/synapsing model for transcriptional regulation by T-bet in which a single dimer of the transcription factor can recognize and coalesce distinct genetic elements, either a promoter plus a distant regulatory element, or promoters on two different genes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document