Membrane potential and impedance changes in hippocampal pyramidal cells during theta rhythm

1989 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Fox
2001 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 2381-2387
Author(s):  
Valeri Lopantsev ◽  
Philip A. Schwartzkroin

Changes in intracellular chloride concentration, mediated by chloride influx through GABAA receptor–gated channels, may modulate GABAB receptor–mediated inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (GABAB IPSPs) via unknown mechanisms. Recording from CA3 pyramidal cells in hippocampal slices, we investigated the impact of chloride influx during GABAA receptor–mediated IPSPs (GABAA IPSPs) on the properties of GABAB IPSPs. At relatively positive membrane potentials (near −55 mV), mossy fiber–evoked GABAB IPSPs were reduced (compared with their magnitude at −60 mV) when preceded by GABAAreceptor–mediated chloride influx. This effect was not associated with a correlated reduction in membrane permeability during the GABAB IPSP. The mossy fiber–evoked GABAB IPSP showed a positive shift in reversal potential (from −99 to −93 mV) when it was preceded by a GABAA IPSP evoked at cell membrane potential of −55 mV as compared with −60 mV. Similarly, when intracellular chloride concentration was raised via chloride diffusion from an intracellular microelectrode, there was a reduction of the pharmacologically isolated monosynaptic GABABIPSP and a concurrent shift of GABAB IPSP reversal potential from −98 to −90 mV. We conclude that in hippocampal pyramidal cells, in which “resting” membrane potential is near action potential threshold, chloride influx via GABAA IPSPs shifts the reversal potential of subsequent GABAB receptor–mediated postsynaptic responses in a positive direction and reduces their magnitude.


1985 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 557-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. McCarren ◽  
B. E. Alger

We have used intracellular recording techniques to study the use-dependence of evoked inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) in rat CA1 hippocampal pyramidal cells. We determined reversal potentials and conductance changes associated with IPSPs and responses to directly applied gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). The IPSP depression could be seen after a single conditioning stimulus. This depression appeared to be due primarily to a 50% decrease in IPSP conductance (gIPSP). Trains of stimulating pulses (50 pulses at 5 or 10 Hz) produced more pronounced effects than a single conditioning pulse. Suprathreshold repetitive stimulation of stratum radiatum (SR) produced epileptiform burst firing and greater depression of IPSPs than did alvear (ALV) or subthreshold SR stimulation. During suprathreshold SR stimulation the IPSP was nearly abolished and the membrane potential could become less negative than the resting potential. A masking effect of facilitated depolarizing potentials on IPSPs was unlikely since IPSPs accompanied by little or no depolarizing potential were also depressed by SR trains. The 75% reduction in IPSP conductance found after repetitive stimulation confirmed that an overlapping conductance was not responsible for the depression of the IPSP. The GABA-induced conductance increase was not depressed by identical trains. Trains of stimulation induced depolarizing shifts in equilibrium potentials for the IPSP (EIPSP) and GABA (EGABA) of approximately 10 mV. These shifts were always greater after SR trains than after ALV trains. Simultaneous recordings of membrane potential and extracellular potassium concentration ([K+]o) with K+-sensitive microelectrodes revealed a direct correlation between the two during a stimulus train. Membrane potential depolarized as much as 18 mV from the peak of the IPSP and [K+]o could increase to a maximum of 10 mM during some trains. A depressant effect (of approximately 50%) of K+ on IPSPs was demonstrated by brief pressure ejection of K+ near the soma. We conclude that repetitive stimulation depresses gIPSP and shifts EIPSP in the depolarizing direction. Whereas gIPSP began to decline after a single conditioning pulse, the additional depression of IPSPs produced by stimulus trains was due in large part to shifts in EIPSP. Depression of gIPSP was not due to desensitization or block of ionic conductances, since gGABA was not reduced. The EIPSP may change as a result of increases in [K+]o.


Nature ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 328 (6129) ◽  
pp. 426-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.-Y. Hu ◽  
Ø. Hvalby ◽  
S. I. Walaas ◽  
K. A. Albert ◽  
P. Skjeflo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document