An essay on terminology, myths,- and known facts: Solar transient-flare-CME-driver gas-piston-BDE-magnetic cloud-shock wave-geomagnetic storm

1996 ◽  
Vol 243 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Schwenn
1996 ◽  
Vol 154 ◽  
pp. 187-193
Author(s):  
Rainer Schwenn

AbstractIn the field of solar-terrestrial relations a clear and unique terminology is needed in order to abolish and avoid unnecessary confusion between the scientists from several involved disciplines. For example, the widely used abbreviation CME (for coronal mass ejection) has turned out to be somewhat misleading. Early on it had been known that other than coronal material is often involved in such events. The discoverers observed transient events of mass ejections from the sun, which could be observed in the corona owing to the newly available coronagraphs. This article is meant to clarify the terminology, with emphasis on giving credit to the original discoverers and the terms they introduced. With this aim in mind I suggest some minor modifications of the terminology.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhani Herdiwijaya ◽  
Khairurrijal ◽  
Mikrajuddin Abdullah ◽  
Wahyu Srigutomo ◽  
Sparisoma Viridi ◽  
...  

1971 ◽  
Vol 49 (15) ◽  
pp. 1982-1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. L. Curzon ◽  
M. G. R. Phillips

The properties of an electric shock tube fitted with a diaphragm are examined. The diaphragm opening process and its effect on the motion of the shock wave are studied. A simple model to account for the diaphragm opening time is given and critical comparisons of theory and results with other work are made.The model works well both for shock tubes employing room temperature driver gas and also for those using heated driver gas. Furthermore, there is strong evidence that the diaphragm opening process is responsible for the accelerating phase of the shock wave motion in both types of shock tube.


1980 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Schwenn ◽  
Helmut Rosenbauer ◽  
Karl-Heinz Mühlhäuser

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. A. Barkhatov ◽  
S. E. Revunov ◽  
M. V. Mukhina ◽  
M. L. Gruzdeva ◽  
O. T. Cherney ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 1401-1404 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Wüest ◽  
M.M Huddleston ◽  
J.L Burch ◽  
D.L Dempsey ◽  
P.D Craven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 398-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. A. Barkhatov ◽  
V. G. Vorobjev ◽  
S. E. Revunov ◽  
O. M. Barkhatova ◽  
O. I. Yagodkina

1998 ◽  
Vol 25 (14) ◽  
pp. 2469-2472 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. F. Webb ◽  
E. W. Cliver ◽  
N. Gopalswamy ◽  
H. S. Hudson ◽  
O. C. St. Cyr

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 2287-2304 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Prikryl ◽  
L. Spogli ◽  
P. T. Jayachandran ◽  
J. Kinrade ◽  
C. N. Mitchell ◽  
...  

Abstract. Arrays of GPS Ionospheric Scintillation and TEC Monitors (GISTMs) are used in a comparative scintillation study focusing on quasi-conjugate pairs of GPS receivers in the Arctic and Antarctic. Intense GPS phase scintillation and rapid variations in ionospheric total electron content (TEC) that can result in cycle slips were observed at high latitudes with dual-frequency GPS receivers during the first significant geomagnetic storm of solar cycle 24 on 5–7 April 2010. The impact of a bipolar magnetic cloud of north-south (NS) type embedded in high speed solar wind from a coronal hole caused a geomagnetic storm with maximum 3-hourly Kp = 8- and hourly ring current Dst = −73 nT. The interhemispheric comparison of phase scintillation reveals similarities but also asymmetries of the ionospheric response in the northern and southern auroral zones, cusps and polar caps. In the nightside auroral oval and in the cusp/cleft sectors the phase scintillation was observed in both hemispheres at about the same times and was correlated with geomagnetic activity. The scintillation level was very similar in approximately conjugate locations in Qiqiktarjuaq (75.4° N; 23.4° E CGM lat. and lon.) and South Pole (74.1° S; 18.9° E), in Longyearbyen (75.3° N; 111.2° E) and Zhongshan (74.7° S; 96.7° E), while it was significantly higher in Cambridge Bay (77.0° N; 310.1° E) than at Mario Zucchelli (80.0° S; 307.7° E). In the polar cap, when the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) was strongly northward, the ionization due to energetic particle precipitation was a likely cause of scintillation that was stronger at Concordia (88.8° S; 54.4° E) in the dark ionosphere than in the sunlit ionosphere over Eureka (88.1° N; 333.4° E), due to a difference in ionospheric conductivity. When the IMF tilted southward, weak or no significant scintillation was detected in the northern polar cap, while in the southern polar cap rapidly varying TEC and strong phase scintillation persisted for many hours. This interhemispheric asymmetry is explained by the difference in the location of solar terminator relative to the cusps in the Northern and Southern Hemisphere. Solar terminator was in the immediate proximity of the cusp in the Southern Hemisphere where sunlit ionospheric plasma was readily convected into the central polar cap and a long series of patches was observed. In contrast, solar terminator was far poleward of the northern cusp thus reducing the entry of sunlit plasma and formation of dense patches. This is consistent with the observed and modeled seasonal variation in occurrence of polar cap patches. The GPS scintillation and TEC data analysis is supported by data from ground-based networks of magnetometers, riometers, ionosondes, HF radars and all-sky imagers, as well as particle flux measurements by DMSP satellites.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document