Experimental study of the stability of cylindrical shells with irregular reinforcement

1978 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 1209-1211
Author(s):  
G. A. Vanin ◽  
R. F. Emel'yanov ◽  
N. P. Semenyuk
1993 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 913-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.B. Nguyen ◽  
M.P. Paı̈doussis ◽  
A.K. Misra

1984 ◽  
Vol 45 (C1) ◽  
pp. C1-495-C1-498
Author(s):  
Yi Changlian ◽  
Chang Hung ◽  
Yan Luguang ◽  
Chen Jinlin

1986 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 1259-1267
Author(s):  
Josef Horák ◽  
Petr Beránek

A simulation apparatus for the experimental study of the methods of control of batch reactors is devised. In this apparatus, the production of heat by an exothermic reaction is replaced by electric heating controlled by a computer in a closed loop; the reactor is cooled with an external cooler whose dynamic properties can be varied while keeping the heat exchange area constant. The effect of the cooler geometry on its dynamic properties is investigated and the effect of the cooler inertia on the stability and safety of the on-off temperature control in the unstable pseudostationary state is examined.


1974 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 1322-1327
Author(s):  
Shun Cheng ◽  
C. K. Chang

The buckling problem of circular cylindrical shells under axial compression, external pressure, and torsion is investigated using a displacement function φ. A governing differential equation for the stability of thin cylindrical shells under combined loading of axial compression, external pressure, and torsion is derived. A method for the solutions of this equation is also presented. The advantage in using the present equation over the customary three differential equations for displacements is that only one trial solution is needed in solving the buckling problems as shown in the paper. Four possible combinations of boundary conditions for a simply supported edge are treated. The case of a cylinder under axial compression is carried out in detail. For two types of simple supported boundary conditions, SS1 and SS2, the minimum critical axial buckling stress is found to be 43.5 percent of the well-known classical value Eh/R3(1−ν2) against the 50 percent of the classical value presently known.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document