Rapid detection of influenza A neuraminidase subtypes by cDNA amplification coupled to a simple DNA enzyme immunoassay

1994 ◽  
Vol 139 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 439-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Schweiger ◽  
I. Lange ◽  
R. Heckler ◽  
H. Willers ◽  
E. Schreier
1996 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 308-309
Author(s):  
B. Schweiger ◽  
C. Kücherer ◽  
C. Fleischer ◽  
H. v. Spreckelsen ◽  
P. Zablocki-Kaiser ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 78 (7) ◽  
pp. 597-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiko MITAMURA ◽  
Masahiko YAMAZAKI ◽  
Masataka ICHIKAWA ◽  
Kazuhiro KIMURA ◽  
Chiharu KAWAKAMI ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 104063872110275
Author(s):  
Yixin Xiao ◽  
Fan Yang ◽  
Fumin Liu ◽  
Linfang Cheng ◽  
Hangping Yao ◽  
...  

Avian influenza A(H5) viruses (avian IAVs) pose a major threat to the economy and public health. We developed an antigen-ELISA (ag-ELISA) and a colloidal gold–based immunochromatographic strip for the rapid detection of avian A(H5) viruses. Both detection methods displayed no cross-reactivity with other viruses (e.g., other avian IAVs, infectious bursal disease virus, Newcastle disease virus, infectious bronchitis virus, avian paramyxovirus). The ag-ELISA was sensitive down to 0.5 hemagglutinin (HA) units/100 µL of avian A(H5) viruses and 7.5 ng/mL of purified H5 HA proteins. The immunochromatographic strip was sensitive down to 1 HA unit/100 µL of avian A(H5) viruses. Both detection methods exhibited good reproducibility with CVs < 10%. For 200 random poultry samples, the sensitivity and specificity of the ag-ELISA were 92.6% and 98.8%, respectively, and for test strips were 88.9% and 98.3%, respectively. Both detection methods displayed high specificity, sensitivity, and stability, making them suitable for rapid detection and field investigation of avian A(H5) viruses.


1998 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 1461-1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Le Pogam ◽  
F. Dubois ◽  
R. Christen ◽  
C. Raby ◽  
A. Cavicchini ◽  
...  

Two methods for genotyping hepatitis C virus (DNA enzyme immunoassay [DEIA] and line probe assay [Inno-LiPA HCV I and II]) were compared on 120 samples and of these 87% were assigned to the same subtype by both assays. There were 15 subtyping discrepancies which involved 5% of type 1 isolates and 90% of type 2 isolates. Amplified products from the core and 5′ untranslated regions (UTR) were sequenced to resolve conflicts. Type 1 discordant samples had a guanosine at position −99 in the 5′ UTR, a characteristic of genotype 1b, and a core region typical of subtype 1a. The eight isolates classified as 2a/2c by LiPA and as subtype 2c by DEIA belonged to type 2.


RSC Advances ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (56) ◽  
pp. 34088-34098
Author(s):  
Minghui Ji ◽  
Yun Xia ◽  
Jacky Fong-Chuen Loo ◽  
Lang Li ◽  
Ho-Pui Ho ◽  
...  

Development of a microfluidic disc-direct reverse-transcription quantitative PCR platform to perform automated multiplex nucleic acid tests for rapid multiplex detection of disease infection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document