Pelvic recurrence rate after abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection for rectal cancer before and after introduction of the stapling technique

1983 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 616-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Luke ◽  
Preben Kirkegaard ◽  
Axel Lendorf ◽  
John Christiansen
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-206
Author(s):  
Adnan Al ALOUL ◽  
◽  
Dan Florin UNGUREANU ◽  
Nicolae BACALBASA ◽  
◽  
...  

Introduction. Pelvic recurrence is not a rare event after resection with curative intent for rectal cancer originating from different segments of the rectum (lower, intermediary and superior part). Material and methods. This retrospective observational study included 106 patients; among these cases there were 79 patients who accepted surgical treatment of rectal cancer (treated in a governmental hospital between 2014 and 2017) and who were submitted to anterior resection with Hartmann’s procedure (6.5% of patients), anterior resection of rectosigmoid with colorectal anastomosis (78% of cases) and abdominoperineal resection (15% of cases). Results. After a 2 year follow-up, pelvic recurrence was reported in 11patients ~ 14% of cases: 33% rate of recurrence after Hartmann procedure, 9% rate of recurrence after abdominoperineal resection, and 10% rate of recurrence after anterior resection of rectosigmoid with colorectal anastomosis. 39 patients (49% of cases) had been submitted to preoperative radiotherapy: the pelvic recurrence rate among these cases was of 11% (9 patients). The rate of recurrence (RR) was also significantly influenced by the stage at diagnostic: stage III had RR = 52% of cases, stage II had RR = 41% of cases and stage I had RR = 0% of cases). The survival rate among surgically treated patients after 1 one year was 86%, and 80% in the first 2 years after treatment. Conclusions. Rectal cancer diagnosed in advanced stages has a high recurrence rate. A low recurrence rate indicates successful curative surgical treatment. The highest recurrence rate was reported after Hartmann procedure (which was usually performed as an emergency operation for locally advanced lesions).


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14598-14598
Author(s):  
T. Z. Mohran ◽  
H. A. Rayad

14598 Objectives: To evaluate the influence of pre-operative chemo-radiation on resectability of locally advanced rectal cancer and the possibility of performing sphincter- sparing surgery in cases not suitable for this procedures. Methods: 30 patients with rectal carcinoma with either border line respectability or not suitable for primary sphincter sparing surgery. Performance status > 60, adequate bone marrow reserve and adequate hepatic and renal functions. All patients had been staged by radiological studies and endoscopies. Treatment: All patients were treated by combined chemo-radiation. Radiotherapy with dose of 45 Gray in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. Chemotherapy with 5-flurouracil 500 mg/m2 I.V infusion over 2 hours and leucovorin immediately before radiation setting for first 5 days of the first week and the first 5 days of the last week of radiation. Patients were evaluated 4–6 weeks after treatment. Operable patients were subjected to abdominoperineal resection (APR) or low anterior resection (AR). Toxicity was evaluated using WHO Common Toxicity Criteria. Results: 30 patients were included; the median age was 48 years. Partial response was reported in 63.4% of patients and stable disease was reported in 33.3% of patients while progressive disease was reported in only one patient. Low anterior resection (AR) had been performed in 8 patients out of 12 (66.2%) who had initially not suitable for primary sphincter preservation, while abdominoperineal resection (APR) had been performed in 11 patients out of 18 patients (61.1%) who had initially border line resectability. Tumor down staging was achieved in 66% of patients. Tumor stage was identified as the only significant prognostic factors in response. Local control rate at 18 months were 85%. Actuarial overall survival for patient with curative resection at 18 months, were 85%. Toxicities included G3 leucopenia in 10% of patients, Diarrhea G3 in 13.3% of patients. Conclusion: Preoperative chemo-radiotherapy is an effective treatment in inducing down-staging of locally advanced rectal cancer patients and enhances curative resection and sphincter preserving procedures. Keyword: Colorectal cancer; Chemo- radiotherapy No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shapour Omidvari ◽  
Sayed Hasan Hamedi ◽  
Mohammad Mohammadianpanah ◽  
Samira Razzaghi ◽  
Ahmad Mosalaei ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 979-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eiji Oki ◽  
Koji Ando ◽  
Hiroshi Saeki ◽  
Yuichiro Nakashima ◽  
Yasue Kimura ◽  
...  

The double-stapling technique using a circular stapler (CS) to create an end-to-end anastomosis is currently used widely in laparoscopic-assisted rectal surgery. However, a high rate of anastomotic failure has been reported. We report new side-to-side anastomosis creation using a CS, the so-called circular side stapling technique (CST). After excising the rectum at the oral and anal sides of the tumor with a linear stapler, a side-to-side colorectal anastomosis was made on the anterior wall of the rectosigmoid colon and the anterior or posterior wall of the rectum with a CS. Between 2012 and 2013, we recorded 30 serial cases of rectal-sigmoid or rectal cancer that were treated with laparoscopic-assisted surgeries using this method. In the 30 cases, the mean age was 68 ± 12 years, operating time was 288 ± 80 minutes, and blood loss was 66 ± 67 mL. None of the patients suffered from anastomosis leakage or postoperative anastomotic bleeding, and none complained of their stool habits. Three months after the last surgery in this cohort, no anastomosis strictures were reported. Based on these results, we propose an alternative method of side-to-side anastomosis for low anterior resection by using a CS to prevent staple overlap. Our experience indicates that the CST is easy and safe. Therefore, this method is a useful alternative to the current method used in laparoscopic surgery.


Medicine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (43) ◽  
pp. e8249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung-Seop Yeom ◽  
In Ja Park ◽  
Sung Woo Jung ◽  
Se Heon Oh ◽  
Jong Lyul Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document