Chinese Expert Consensus on Iodine125 Seed Implantation for Recurrent Cervical Cancer in 2021

The treatment modality for recurrent cervical cancer (rCC) is limited, and the prognosis of these patients is poor. Seed implantation could be an important component of rCC management in the context of dose boost or salvage therapy after surgery or radiotherapy, which is characterized by a minimally invasive, high local dose, and rapidly does fall, sparing normal tissue. For patients with good performance status and lateral pelvic wall recurrence with an available puncture path, seed implantation was recommended, as well as for selected central pelvic recurrence and extra-pelvic recurrence. The combination of brachytherapy treatment planning system and CT guidance was needed, and three-dimensional printing templates could greatly improve the accuracy, efficiency, and quality of seed implantation to achieve a potential ablative effect and provide an efficient treatment for rCC. However, the recommendations of seed implantation were mainly based on retrospective articles and lack high-quality evidence, and multicenter prospective randomized studies are needed. In this consensus on iodine125 seed implantation for rCC, indication selection, technical process and requirements, dosimetry criteria, radiation protection, combined systemic therapy, and outcomes of seed implantation for rCC are discussed.

Diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/MRI versus MRI alone in the diagnosis of pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer

Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/MRI and MRI in the diagnosis of pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer. Methods All PET/MRIs of patients in the follow-up of rectal cancer performed between 2011 and 2018 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Recurrence was confirmed/excluded either by histopathology or imaging follow-up (> 4 months). Four groups of readers (groups 1/2: one radiologist each, groups 3/4: one radiologist/one nuclear medicine physician) independently interpreted MRI and PET/MRI. The likelihood of recurrence was scored on a 5-point-scale. Inter-reader agreement, sensitivity, specificity, PPV/NPV and accuracy were assessed. ROC curve analyses were performed. Results Fourty-one PET/MRIs of 40 patients (mean 61 years ± 10.9; 11 women, 29 men) were included. Sensitivity of PET/MRI in detecting recurrence was 94%, specificity 88%, PPV/NPV 97% and 78%, accuracy 93%. Sensitivity of MRI was 88%, specificity 75%, PPV/NPV 94% and 60%, accuracy 85%. ROC curve analyses showed an AUC of 0.97 for PET/MRI and 0.92 for MRI, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.116). On MRI more cases were scored as equivocal (12% versus 5%). Inter-reader agreement was substantial for PET/MRI and MRI (0.723 and 0.656, respectively). Conclusion 18F-FDG-PET/MRI and MRI are accurate in the diagnosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy are comparable for both modalities, but PET/MRI increases readers’ confidence levels and reduces the number of equivocal cases. Graphic abstract

Neobladder and ablative pelvic radiotherapy: still a taboo?

The presence of a neobladder constitutes a limitation for the radiation oncologist, as there is no clear evidence about its tolerance to radiotherapy (RT). The limited literature only concerns the conventional postoperative treatment in patients with bladder cancer after cystectomy. Here we report a case of a patient with neobladder who underwent a stereotactic RT for a pelvic recurrence of disease, with response to treatment and no toxicity to the neobladder. This case represents a promising example of the chance to perform RT with ablative intent, using advanced techniques, even on lesions close to the neobladder.

Post-resectional pelvic recurrences of rectal cancer

Introduction. Pelvic recurrence is not a rare event after resection with curative intent for rectal cancer originating from different segments of the rectum (lower, intermediary and superior part). Material and methods. This retrospective observational study included 106 patients; among these cases there were 79 patients who accepted surgical treatment of rectal cancer (treated in a governmental hospital between 2014 and 2017) and who were submitted to anterior resection with Hartmann’s procedure (6.5% of patients), anterior resection of rectosigmoid with colorectal anastomosis (78% of cases) and abdominoperineal resection (15% of cases). Results. After a 2 year follow-up, pelvic recurrence was reported in 11patients ~ 14% of cases: 33% rate of recurrence after Hartmann procedure, 9% rate of recurrence after abdominoperineal resection, and 10% rate of recurrence after anterior resection of rectosigmoid with colorectal anastomosis. 39 patients (49% of cases) had been submitted to preoperative radiotherapy: the pelvic recurrence rate among these cases was of 11% (9 patients). The rate of recurrence (RR) was also significantly influenced by the stage at diagnostic: stage III had RR = 52% of cases, stage II had RR = 41% of cases and stage I had RR = 0% of cases). The survival rate among surgically treated patients after 1 one year was 86%, and 80% in the first 2 years after treatment. Conclusions. Rectal cancer diagnosed in advanced stages has a high recurrence rate. A low recurrence rate indicates successful curative surgical treatment. The highest recurrence rate was reported after Hartmann procedure (which was usually performed as an emergency operation for locally advanced lesions).

Therapeutic effects and prognostic factors of 125I brachytherapy for pelvic recurrence after early cervical cancer surgery

To investigate the efficacy of 125I seed implantation in the treatment regimen of pelvic recurrence after early cervical cancer surgery and to analyse prognostic factors. To evaluate efficacy and analyse prognostic factors of 125I seed implantation for pelvic recurrence after early cervical cancer surgery. A prospective study was conducted on 62 patients who experienced pelvic recurrence after early cervical cancer surgery between August 2005 and September 2015. The 62 patients were treated and assessed in 2 groups (n = 30). All 62 patients were randomized into two groups that received two different treatment regimens: the treatment group (n = 30), which received 125I particle implantation therapy, and the control group (n = 32), which received whole-pelvic irradiation using the anteroposterior/posteroanterior field and cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation therapy. The efficacy/efficiency of 125I seed implantation and prognostic factors were analysed by logistic regression. Overall survival was determined by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Multivariate analysis results were obtained by the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The effective control rates at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months were 76.7%, 80.0%, 83.3%, and 86.7% in the 125I particle implantation group. The total effective control rates at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months were 65.6%, 65.5%, 62.5%, and 71.9% in the chemoradiotherapy group. Significant differences were observed between the two groups. The overall survival rates at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years and the median overall were 96.7%, 93.3%, 86.7%, 71.9%, 65.6% and 4.34 years, respectively, in the 125I seed implantation group and 81.3%, 71.9%, 62.5%, 56.3%, 53.1% and 3.59 years, respectively, in the control group. There were statistically significant differences in survival rates depending on the diameter of the largest recurrent pelvic tumour (χ2 = 6.611, P = 0.010). The multivariate analysis showed that the survival rates were related to the diameter of the largest recurrent pelvic tumour (χ2 = 4.538, P = 0.033). 125I implantation is an effective, safe, and promising method for the treatment of pelvic recurrence after early cervical cancer surgery. The diameter of the recurrent pelvic tumour was identified as a significant independent prognostic factor in patients who received 125I implantation.

Low-dose adjuvant vaginal cylinder brachytherapy for early-stage non-endometrioid endometrial cancer: recurrence risk and survival outcomes

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate recurrence patterns and survival outcomes for patients with early-stage non-endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma treated with adjuvant high-dose rate vaginal brachytherapy with a low-dose scheme.MethodsA retrospective review was performed of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I–II non-endometrioid endometrial cancer who received adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy with a low-dose regimen of 24 Gy in six fractions from November 2005 to May 2017. All patients had >6 months of follow-up. Rates of recurrence-free survival, overall survival, vaginal, pelvic, and distant recurrence were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival were evaluated by Cox proportional hazards modeling.ResultsA total of 106 patients were analyzed. Median follow-up was 49 months (range 9–119). Histologic subtypes were serous (47%, n=50), clear cell (10%, n=11), mixed (27%, n=29), and carcinosarcoma (15%, n=16). Most patients (79%) had stage IA disease, 94% had surgical nodal assessment, and 13% had lymphovascular invasion. Adjuvant chemotherapy was delivered to 75%. The 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were 74% and 83%, respectively. By histology, 5-year recurrence-free/overall survival rates were: serous 73%/78%, clear cell 68%/88%, mixed 88%/100%, and carcinosarcoma 56%/60% (p=0.046 and p<0.01). On multivariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion was significantly associated with recurrence (HR 3.3, p<0.01). The 5-year vaginal, pelvic, and distant recurrence rates were 7%, 8%, and 21%, respectively. Vaginal and pelvic recurrence rates were highest for patients with carcinosarcoma, lymphovascular invasion and/or FIGO stage IB/II disease. At 5 years, vaginal and pelvic recurrence rates for patients with lymphovascular invasion were 33% and 40%, respectively. Patients with stage IA disease or no lymphovascular invasion had 5-year vaginal recurrence rates of 4% and pelvic recurrence rates of 6% and 3%, respectively.ConclusionsAdjuvant high-dose rate brachytherapy with a low-dose scheme is effective for most patients with early-stage non-endometrioid endometrial cancer, particularly stage IA disease and no lymphovascular invasion. Pelvic radiation therapy should be considered for those with carcinosarcoma, lymphovascular invasion and/or stage IB/II disease.