Drag force in dense gas-particle two-phase flow

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
You Changfu ◽  
Qi Haiying ◽  
Xu Xuchang
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Zhang ◽  
Minjun Peng ◽  
Tenglong Cong ◽  
Chuan Lu ◽  
Chenyang Wang

Abstract The interfacial area concentration (IAC) is an important parameter in the calculation of interfacial transfers in two-fluid model, which can affect the accuracy of the boiling simulations. In this paper, an improved IAC model based on drag force and drift velocity is obtained, which can make full use of the experimental data and the models of the drag force and the drift velocity to avoid the shortage of IAC algebraic model in two-phase flow simulations theoretically. The improved model is validated by the DEBORA boiling flow experiment data. The reasonable radial distributions of void fraction, liquid temperature and phase velocity can be obtained, which indicates that the improved IAC model coupled in boiling flow model can be applied in CFD simulation of two-phase boiling flow. The improved model provides a new calculation approach for the IAC in the boiling flow with multi flow regimes.


Author(s):  
Changfu You ◽  
Haiying Qi ◽  
Xuchang Xu

Effect of turbulence on drag force in gas-particle two-phase flow had been investigated using numerical simulation. In order to select an accurate turbulence model, some promising models, such as standard k-ε model, RNG k-ε model and Realizable k-ε model, had been examined through calculating the flow over a backward-facing step. RNG k-ε model performing better than others had been used to simulate the turbulence flow over a spherical particle. In computation, the turbulence intensity was ranged from 10% to 80%, and the turbulence length scale from 10−5m to 4m. Results show that the turbulence length scale had a small effect on the drag force, except at small length scale. Comparing with the drag on a particle in laminar flow, the turbulence intensity enhances it comparatively, especially at small particle Reynolds numbers, which differs from the previous publications.


Author(s):  
Key Sun Kim ◽  
Woo Gun Sim ◽  
Banzragch Dagdan

An analytical model was developed by Sim to calculate the two-phase damping ratio for upward two-phase flow perpendicular to horizontal tube bundles. To verify the model, the present experiment is performed with a typical normal square array of cylinders subjected to the two-phase flow of air-water in the tube bundles. The diameter of cylinder is 18mm and the pitch ratio to diameter is 1.35. Using a pressure transducer and data acquisition system, pressure loss along the flow direction in the tube bundles is measured to evaluate the two-phase Euler number and the two-phase friction multiplier. The drag force along the flow direction on a tube is measured to calculate the drag coefficient and the two-phase damping ratio. The experimental results of the two-phase damping ratios are compared with the analytical results given by Sim’s model for homogeneous two-phase flow. It was found that, as increasing the mass flux, the drag force and the drag coefficients given by experimental test are close to the results calculated by the homogeneous model. As a result, the damping ratio can be evaluated by the homogeneous model for bubbly flow of sufficiently large mass flux.


Author(s):  
Changfu You ◽  
Haiying Qi ◽  
Xuchang Xu

Research of the effect of non-spherical particle on the drag force had been carried out using numerical method. At Re<100, the flow over three different non-spherical particle (cube, cylinder and frustum) had been calculated with N-S equations. In particular, the performance of three promising correlations for the drag coefficient of the non-spherical particle had been critically examined with the computational results. The best method appears to be that of Ganser which uses the equal volume sphere diameter and sphericity of particle. Comparing the results obtained by two different cylinder’s arrangement, the axis of cylinder perpendicular to the coming flow direction and parallel to that, the divergence between them is very obvious.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document