Currently there is no integral experimental data for code validation regarding the decay heat of MOX fuels, excepted fission burst experiments (for fission products contributions at short cooling times) or post-irradiated experiments on nuclide inventories (restricted number of nuclide of interest for decay heat). The uncertainty quantification mainly relies on uncertainty propagation of nuclear data covariances. In the recent years, the transposition method, based on the data assimilation theory, was used in order to transpose the experiment-to-calculation discrepancies at a given set of parameters (cooling time, fuel burnup) to another set of parameters. As an example, this method was used on the CLAB experiments and the experiment-to-calculation discrepancies at 13 years were transposed to an UOX fuel between 5 and 27 years and for burnups from 10 to 50 GWd/t. The purpose of this paper is to study to what extent the transposition method could be used for MOX fuels. In particular, the Dickens fission burst experiment of 239Pu was considered for MOX fuels at short cooling times (< 1h30) and low burnup (< 10 GWd/t). The impact of fission yields (FY) correlations was also discussed. As a conclusion, the efficiency of the transposition process is limited by the experimental uncertainties larger than nuclear data uncertainties, and by the fact that fission burst experiments would only be representative to the FY contribution of the decay heat uncertainty of an irradiated reactor fuel. Nevertheless, this method strengthens the decay heat uncertainties at very short cooling times, previously based only on nuclear data covariance propagation through computation.
Summation Calculations for Reactor Antineutrino Spectra, Decay Heat and Delayed Neutron Fractions Involving New TAGS Data and Evaluated Databases
