Effect of whole seed tuber size and pre-plant storage conditions on yield and tuber size distribution of Russet Burbank

2004 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 371-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter J. Arsenault ◽  
Bert R. Christie
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Seed Tuber ◽  
Storage Conditions ◽  
Tuber Size ◽  
Russet Burbank ◽  
Tuber Size Distribution ◽  
Whole Seed ◽  
Plant Storage

TUBER SIZE CONTROL IN SHEPODY AND RUSSET BURBANK POTATOES VIA MODIFICATION OF SEED TUBER STORAGE CONDITIONS

2003 ◽  
pp. 361-369
Author(s):  
K. Pruski ◽  
S. Asiedu ◽  
R. Prange ◽  
B. Daniels-Lake ◽  
J. Nowak
Keyword(s):  
Seed Tuber ◽  
Size Control ◽  
Storage Conditions ◽  
Tuber Size ◽  
Russet Burbank

Influence of irrigation, nitrogen and seed piece spacing on yields and tuber size distribution of seed potatoes

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doug Waterer
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Seed Piece ◽  
Total Yield ◽  
Tuber Size ◽  
Russet Burbank ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Total N ◽  
Tuber Size Distribution ◽  
Seed Spacing ◽  
Yield Responses

This study examined the influence of irrigation, soil nitrogen (N) levels and seed piece spacing on the yields and tuber size distribution of Norland, Russet Burbank and Shepody potatoes over three seasons at two sites in central Saskatchewan. The crops were grown under standard irrigated conditions or on dryland with in-row spacings of 15, 23 or 30 cm and total N levels of 200 or 300 kg ha−1 as either preplant or split applications. Irrigation greatly enhanced yields of all tuber size categories in the drier years but had less effect if seasonal precipitation reached or exceeded normal levels. Smaller size tubers formed a greater proportion of the total yield in crops exposed to drought stress. Norland was less affected by drought than the later-maturing cultivars. Yield responses to N were limited to situations where soil moisture was abundant or crop demand for nutrients was increased by close in-row spacings. Close in-row spacing increased total yields in some cases, while in others it resulted in a reduction in tuber size with little effect on overall yields. Yields for the cultivar Norland were less affected by seed piece spacing than yields for Russet Burbank or Shepody. Key words: Solanum tuberosum, drop seed, spacing, fertility

Seed-piece Spacing Influences Yield, Size Distribution, Net Returns, and Stem and Tuber Density of Three Processing Potato Cultivars

HortScience ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 536a-536
Author(s):  
Stephen L. Love ◽  
Asunta Thompson-Johns
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Seed Piece ◽  
Tuber Size ◽  
Russet Burbank ◽  
Potato Cultivars ◽  
Stem Density ◽  
Economic Consideration ◽  
Ranger Russet ◽  
Tuber Size Distribution ◽  
Net Returns

Seed-piece spacing is an important economic consideration in the production of potatoes and optimum varies by cultivar and intended market. A study was designed to determine the influence of seed-piece spacing on yield, tuber size distribution, net returns and stem and tuber density of three processing potato cultivars. Seed tubers of cvs. Russet Burbank, Frontier Russet and Ranger Russet were planted 8, 15, 23, 31, 46, 61, 76, or 91 cm apart at two locations in 1988 and 1989. Total, marketable (U.S. No. 1), and mid-size (226–452 g tubers) yield, yield of five incremental size categories, net profits from a typical processing contract, and stem and tuber density (number per m of row) were determined. All three cultivars achieved highest total yields at the narrowest (8 cm) spacing. Marketable and mid-size yield were optimized between 15 and 31 cm depending on the cultivar. The size distribution of tubers shifted from a predominance of small tubers at the narrow spacing treatments to a predominance of large tubers at the wide spacing treatments. The rate of shift across spacing treatments was cultivar dependent. Russet Burbank showed a bimodal response to spacing for net returns with optimums at the 23- and 46-cm spacing treatments. Frontier Russet and Ranger Russet showed optimums at 23 cm. All three cultivars gave maximum mid-size yields at a stem density of 10.5–12.1 per m of row and a tuber density of 23.9–24.9 per m of row.

scholarly journals Seed Piece Spacing Influences Yield, Tuber Size Distribution, Stem and Tuber Density, and Net Returns of Three Processing Potato Cultivars

HortScience ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 629-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen L. Love ◽  
Asunta Thompson-Johns
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Seed Piece ◽  
Tuber Size ◽  
Russet Burbank ◽  
Potato Cultivars ◽  
Stem Density ◽  
Ranger Russet ◽  
Tuber Size Distribution ◽  
Net Returns ◽  
Optimum Spacing

Seed piece spacing is an important economic consideration in the production of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). The optimum spacing varies with cultivar and intended market. A study was designed to determine the influence of seed piece spacing on yield, tuber size distribution, net returns, and stem and tuber density of three processing potato cultivars. Seed tubers of cultivars Russet Burbank, Frontier Russet, and Ranger Russet were planted 8, 15, 23, 31, 46, 61, 76, or 91 cm apart at two locations in 1988 and 1989. Total, marketable (U.S. No. 1), and midsize (226–452 g tubers) yield, tuber size distribution, net profits from a representative processing contract, and stem and tuber density (number per meters of row) were determined. All three cultivars achieved highest total yields at the narrowest (8 cm) spacing. Maximum marketable and midsize (226–452 g) yield occurred between 15 and 31 cm, depending on the cultivar. Size distribution shifted from a predominance of small tubers at narrow spacings to a predominance of large tubers at wide spacings, and the rate of shift was cultivar-dependent. `Russet Burbank' showed a broad range of optimal spacing for net returns, with a maximum in the range of 23 to 46 cm. Optima for `Frontier Russet' and `Ranger Russet' were between 15 and 46 cm. Of the four tuber measurements, midsize yield appeared to be best for determining optimum spacing. Marketable yield was also a useful measurement. All three cultivars gave maximum midsize yields at a stem density of 10.5 to 12.1 per meter of row and a tuber density of 23.9 to 24.9 per meter of row. Tuber density showed some promise as a predictor of optimum seed piece spacing for new cultivars.

Foliar‐Applied Daminozide Effect on the Yield and Tuber Size Distribution of Potato

1990 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Sanderson ◽  
R. P. White ◽  
H. W. Platt ◽  
J. A. Ivany
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Tuber Size ◽  
Tuber Size Distribution

Effects of nitrogen application and seedpiece spacing on yield and tuber size distribution in eight potato cultivars

2001 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter J. Arsenault ◽  
Debby A. LeBlanc ◽  
George C. C. Tai ◽  
Peter Boswall
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Tuber Size ◽  
Potato Cultivars ◽  
Nitrogen Application ◽  
Tuber Size Distribution

The effects of the growth-regulating compounds methyl decanoate and 2, 3, 5-triiodobenzoic acid on potato tuber size

1976 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-255
Author(s):  
D. C. E. Wurr
Keyword(s):  
Potato Tuber ◽  
Size Distribution ◽  
Tuber Yield ◽  
Potato Crop ◽  
Total Yield ◽  
Tuber Size ◽  
Tuber Initiation ◽  
Triiodobenzoic Acid ◽  
Tuber Size Distribution ◽  
Methyl Decanoate

SummaryApplication of methyl decanoate to a potato crop about the time of tuber initiation reduced the total yield and the yield of tubers in the grade 2·5–5·5 cm though neither of these reductions were significant. However, application of 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid increased the yield of tubers 2·5–5·5 cm by up to 20% while having no significant effect on total tuber yield. This change in the tuber size distribution was due to a more even partition of photosynthate between tubers and not to an increase in the total number of tubers.

The impact of some agronomic factors on the variability of potato tuber size distribution

1993 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. E. Wurr ◽  
Jane R. Fellows ◽  
J. R. Lynn ◽  
E. J. Allen
Keyword(s):  
Potato Tuber ◽  
Size Distribution ◽  
Tuber Size ◽  
Tuber Size Distribution ◽  
The Impact
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document