A survey of the use of assessment instruments by eating disorder professionals in clinical practice

Author(s):  
D. A. Anderson ◽  
C. A. Paulosky

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 243-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terra L. Towne ◽  
Kyle P. De Young ◽  
Drew A. Anderson


Author(s):  
Thandeka Mdladlo ◽  
Penelope Flack ◽  
Robin Joubert

This article presents the results of a survey conducted on Speech-Language Therapists (SLTs) regarding current practices in the assessment of English Additional Language (EAL) speakers in South Africa. It forms part of the rationale for a broader (PhD) study that critiques the use of assessment instruments on EAL speakers from an indigenous linguistic and cultural background. This article discusses an aspect of the broader research and presents the background, method, findings, discussion and implications of the survey. The results of this survey highlight the challenges of human and material resources to, and the dominance of English in, the profession in South Africa. The findings contribute to understanding critical factors for acquiring reliable and valid assessment results with diverse populations, particularly the implications from a cultural and linguistic perspective.[PDF to follow]



Author(s):  
Robyn Sysko ◽  
Sara Alavi

In comparison to other psychiatric diagnoses, eating disorders are relatively rare among the population, but are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This chapter focuses on the assessment of eating disorders in adults and youth, including individuals with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder. It begins with a review of the nature of the disorders, which is followed by a review of clinical assessment instruments designed for the assessment purposes of (a) diagnosis, (b) case conceptualization and treatment planning, and (c) treatment monitoring and evaluation. Recommendations are included for instruments with the greatest scientific support and for assessing eating disorders in a clinically sensitive manner.



1989 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 136-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bryce Fifield

The use of personal computers to aid in the administration, scoring, and interpretation of individual psychoeducational tests is growing. Currently computers are used to assist in managing assessment information, scoring and interpreting tests, and administering tests of cognitive abilities, academic skills, adaptive behaviors, and social skills. Although the content validity of assessment instruments developed for computer administration may have certain practical limitations, several useful advantages can be gained by using the computer to administer tests. Some of the advantages include improved levels of standardization in the procedures used during test administration, scoring, and interpretation; the collection of response data in real time; and the development and use of assessment models that were heretofore too complex for human presentation.



2010 ◽  
Vol 143 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 102-102
Author(s):  
Maria-Dolors Estrada Sabadell ◽  
Anna Kotzeva ◽  
Vicente Turón ◽  
Dolors Benítez ◽  
Graciela Rodríguez


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-288
Author(s):  
Robyn L. Tate

AbstractHealth outcome measurement is a growth industry. Thousands of behavioural assessment instruments, developed for neurological populations alone, are available for diagnosis, prediction and evaluation of interventions. The task of selecting the best instrument for the purpose at hand is thus a daunting one for the clinician and researcher. Fortunately, there are guides that make the task easier. This presidential address covers three interrelated themes that inform assessment in neurorehabilitation: First, it reviews current concepts and the status of behavioural assessment in neurorehabilitation. It then examines evidence-based clinical practice as applied to assessment of function, along with methods to benchmark the scientific quality of assessment instruments. Finally, the article considers the need to move beyond outcome measurement in the neurorehabilitation setting.



2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Thomas ◽  
S. S. Delinsky ◽  
S. A. St. Germain ◽  
T. J. Weigel ◽  
C. M. Tangren ◽  
...  


2010 ◽  
Vol 178 (3) ◽  
pp. 511-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer J. Thomas ◽  
Sherrie S. Delinsky ◽  
Sarah A. St. Germain ◽  
Thomas J. Weigel ◽  
Christopher M. Tangren ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document