The Effects of Minimal and Maximal Peer Tutoring Systems on the Academic Performance of College Students

1991 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna M. Lidren ◽  
Steven E. Meier ◽  
Thomas A. Brigham
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Van Buladaco ◽  
Garri Mikhail Aguirre ◽  
Joshua Manito ◽  
Alexis Soliman ◽  
El Christian Villareal

NASPA Journal ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kellah M. Edens

College students are sleeping less during the week than reported a few years ago. Lack of sleep among college students has been identified as one of the top three healthrelated impediments to academic performance by the American College Health Association’s National College Health Assessment survey; and it is associated with lower grades, incompletion of courses, as well as negative moods. This research examines the underlying dynamics of lack of sleep on academic motivation, a key predictor of academic performance. Specifically, the relationship of sleep habits with self-efficacy, performance versus mastery goal orientation, persistence, and tendency to procrastinate were investigated. Findings indicate that 42% of the participants (159 students out of a total of 377) experience excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS); and those identified with EDS tend: (1) to be motivated by performance goals rather than mastery goals; (2) to engage in procrastination (a self-handicapping strategy) to a greater extent than students who are rested; and (3) to have decreased self-efficacy, as compared to students not reporting EDS. Several recommendations for campus health professionals to consider for a Healthy Campus Initiative are made based on the findings.


2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa A. Harrison ◽  
Chiesha M. Stevens ◽  
Adrienne N. Monty ◽  
Christine A. Coakley

1993 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Hogan ◽  
Mary Anne Prater

The effects of peer tutoring and self-management on on-task behavior and academic performance (tutee) as well as disruptive behaviors (tutor) were examined. The tutor had been identified as behaviorally disordered and the tutee as learning disabled. During the peer tutoring condition the tutee improved his on-task and academic performance but the tutor's disruptive behavior did not change. Self-management was initiated for both subjects. During self-monitoring the tutee's on-task behavior improved above that during peer tutoring. The tutor self-monitored his disruptive behavior but only slight improvements were observed. A self-instructional component was then added and the disruptive behavior was eliminated. For both subjects, a multiple baseline across-settings design was applied and results were observed across resource and general education English and mathematics classes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document