scholarly journals Impact of the first COVID-19 shutdown on patient volumes and surgical procedures of a Level I trauma center

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolin A. Kreis ◽  
Birte Ortmann ◽  
Moritz Freistuehler ◽  
René Hartensuer ◽  
Hugo Van Aken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Control Period ◽  
Open Fractures ◽  
Injury Patterns ◽  
Emergency Patient ◽  
Emergency Operations ◽  
Incidence Proportion ◽  
Level I ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Purpose In Dec 2019, COVID-19 was first recognized and led to a worldwide pandemic. The German government implemented a shutdown in Mar 2020, affecting outpatient and hospital care. The aim of the present article was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 shutdown on patient volumes and surgical procedures of a Level I trauma center in Germany. Methods All emergency patients were recorded retrospectively during the shutdown and compared to a calendar-matched control period (CTRL). Total emergency patient contacts including trauma mechanisms, injury patterns and operation numbers were recorded including absolute numbers, incidence proportions and risk ratios. Results During the shutdown period, we observed a decrease of emergency patient cases (417) compared to CTRL (575), a decrease of elective cases (42 vs. 13) and of the total number of operations (397 vs. 325). Incidence proportions of emergency operations increased from 8.2 to 12.2% (shutdown) and elective surgical cases decreased (11.1 vs. 4.3%). As we observed a decrease for most trauma mechanisms and injury patterns, we found an increasing incidence proportion for severe open fractures. Household-related injuries were reported with an increasing incidence proportion from 26.8 to 47.5% (shutdown). We found an increasing tendency of trauma and injuries related to psychological disorders. Conclusion This analysis shows a decrease of total patient numbers in an emergency department of a Level I trauma center and a decrease of the total number of operations during the shutdown period. Concurrently, we observed an increase of severe open fractures and emergency operations. Furthermore, trauma mechanism changed with less traffic, work and sports-related accidents.

scholarly journals Impact of the COVID-19 shutdown on orthopedic trauma numbers and patterns in an academic Level I Trauma Center in Berlin, Germany

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0246956
Author(s):  
Tazio Maleitzke ◽  
Matthias Pumberger ◽  
Undine A. Gerlach ◽  
Carolin Herrmann ◽  
Anna Slagman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Control Period ◽  
Orthopedic Trauma ◽  
Injury Patterns ◽  
Total Patient ◽  
Academic Level ◽  
Level I ◽  
Rate Ratios ◽  
And Control ◽  
The Impact

Background The COVID-19 pandemic led to the implementation of drastic shutdown measures worldwide. While quarantine, self-isolation and shutdown laws helped to effectively contain and control the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the impact of COVID-19 shutdowns on trauma care in emergency departments (EDs) remains elusive. Methods All ED patient records from the 35-day COVID-19 shutdown (SHUTDOWN) period were retrospectively compared to a calendar-matched control period in 2019 (CTRL) as well as to a pre (PRE)- and post (POST)-shutdown period in an academic Level I Trauma Center in Berlin, Germany. Total patient and orthopedic trauma cases and contacts as well as trauma causes and injury patterns were evaluated during respective periods regarding absolute numbers, incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and risk ratios (RRs). Findings Daily total patient cases (SHUTDOWN vs. CTRL, 106.94 vs. 167.54) and orthopedic trauma cases (SHUTDOWN vs. CTRL, 30.91 vs. 52.06) decreased during the SHUTDOWN compared to the CTRL period with IRRs of 0.64 and 0.59. While absolute numbers decreased for most trauma causes during the SHUTDOWN period, we observed increased incidence proportions of household injuries and bicycle accidents with RRs of 1.31 and 1.68 respectively. An RR of 2.41 was observed for injuries due to domestic violence. We further recorded increased incidence proportions of acute and regular substance abuse during the SHUTDOWN period with RRs of 1.63 and 3.22, respectively. Conclusions While we observed a relevant decrease in total patient cases, relative proportions of specific trauma causes and injury patterns increased during the COVID-19 shutdown in Berlin, Germany. As government programs offered prompt financial aid during the pandemic to individuals and businesses, additional social support may be considered for vulnerable domestic environments.

The Impact of In-house Attending Surgeon Supervision on the Rates of Preventable and Potentially Preventable Complications and Death at the Start of the New Academic Year

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
pp. 1134-1139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Inaba ◽  
Adam Hauch ◽  
Bernardino C. Branco ◽  
Stephen Cohn ◽  
Pedro G. R. Teixeira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
University Of Southern California ◽  
Academic Level ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Level I ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Academic Year

The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of in-house attending surgeon supervision on the rate of preventable deaths (PD) and complications (PC) at the beginning of the academic year. All trauma patients admitted to the Los Angeles County 1 University of Southern California Medical Center over an 8-year period ending in December 2009 were reviewed. Morbidity and mortality reports were used to extract all PD/PC. Patients admitted in the first 2 months (July/ August) of the academic year were compared with those admitted at the end of the year (May/June) for two distinct time periods: 2002 to 2006 (before in-house attending surgeon supervision) and 2007 to 2009 (after 24-hour/day in-house attending surgeon supervision). During 2002 to 2006, patients admitted at the beginning of the year had significantly higher rates of PC (1.1% for July/ August vs 0.6% for May/June; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 3.2; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in mortality (6.5% for July/August vs 4.6% for May/ June; adjusted OR, 1.1; 95% CI,0.8 to 1.5; P = 0.179). During 2007 to 2009, after institution of 24-hour/day in-house attending surgeon supervision of fellows and housestaff, there was no significant difference in the rates of PC (0.7% for July/August vs 0.6% for May/June; OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.3; P = 0.870) or PD (4.6% for July/August vs 3.7% for May/June; OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.7; P = 0.250) seen at the beginning of the academic year. At an academic Level I trauma center, the institution of 24-hour/day in-house attending surgeon supervision significantly reduced the spike of preventable complications previously seen at the beginning of the academic year.

scholarly journals Influence of a Stay-At-Home Order on Trauma Volume and Injury Patterns at a Level I Trauma Center in Ohio

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110474
Author(s):  
Gregory S. Huang ◽  
Elisha A. Chance ◽  
C. Michael Dunham
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Drug Testing ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Census Data ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Injury Patterns ◽  
Trauma Service ◽  
Level I ◽  
At Home

Background Changes in injury patterns during the COVID pandemic have been reported in other states. The objective was to explore changes to trauma service volume and admission characteristics at a trauma center in northeast Ohio during a stay-at-home order (SAHO) and compare the 2020 data to historic trauma census data. Methods Retrospective chart review of adult trauma patients admitted to a level I trauma center in northeast Ohio. Trauma admissions from January 21 to July 21, 2020 (COVID period) were compared to date-matched cohorts of trauma admissions from 2018 to 2019 (historic period). The COVID period was further categorized as pre-SAHO, active-SAHO, and post-SAHO. Results The SAHO was associated with a reduction in trauma center admissions that increased after the SAHO ( P = .0033). Only outdoor recreational vehicle (ORV) injuries ( P = .0221) and self-inflicted hanging ( P = .0028) mechanisms were increased during the COVID period and had substantial effect sizes. Glasgow Coma Scores were lower during the COVID period ( P = .0286) with a negligible effect size. Violence-related injuries, injury severity, mortality, and admission characteristics including alcohol and drug testing and positivity were similar in the COVID and historic periods. Discussion The SAHO resulted in a temporary decrease in trauma center admissions. Although ORV and hanging mechanisms were increased, other mechanisms such as alcohol and toxicology proportions, injury severity, length of stay, and mortality were unchanged.

Abdominal Hollow Viscus Injuries are Associated with Spine and Neurologic Infections after Penetrating Spinal Cord Injuries

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (10) ◽  
pp. 966-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander C. Schwed ◽  
David S. Plurad ◽  
Scott Bricker ◽  
Angela Neville ◽  
Fred Bongard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Spinal Cord Injuries ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Injury Patterns ◽  
Hollow Viscus ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Level I ◽  
The Impact

Penetrating spinal cord injuries are rare but potentially devastating injuries that are associated with significant morbidity. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of abdominal hollow viscus injuries (HVIs) on neurologic and spinal infectious complications in patients sustaining penetrating spinal cord injuries. We performed a 13-year retrospective review of a Level I trauma center database. Variables analyzed included demographics, injury patterns and severity, spine operations, and outcomes. Spine and neurologic infections (SNIs) were defined as para-spinal or spinal abscess, osteomyelitis, and meningitis. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with SNI. Of 137 patients, there were 126 males (92%) with a mean age of 27 ± 10 years. Eight patients (6%) underwent operative stabilization of their spine. Fifteen patients (11%) developed SNI. There was a higher incidence of SNI among patients with abdominal HVI compared with those without (eight [26%] vs six [6%], P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, after controlling for injury severity, solid abdominal injury and HVI, vascular injury, and spine operation, abdominal HVIs were independently associated with an increased risk for SNI (odds ratio, 6.88; 95% confidence interval, 2.14 to 22.09; P = 0.001). Further studies are required to determine the optimal management strategy to prevent and successfully treat these infections.

The impact of selective laboratory evaluation on utilization of laboratory resources and patient care in a level-i trauma center

1996 ◽  
Vol 172 (5) ◽  
pp. 558-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uyen B. Chu ◽  
Frederick W. Clevenger ◽  
Emran R. Imami ◽  
Simon D. Lampard ◽  
Eric R. Frykberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Laboratory Evaluation ◽  
Level I ◽  
The Impact

Pelvic Fracture Risk Assessment on Admission

2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (8) ◽  
pp. 761-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Om P. Sharma ◽  
Michael F. Oswanski ◽  
Jamal Rabbi ◽  
Gregory M. Georgiadis ◽  
Sherry K. Lauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Open Fractures ◽  
Open Book ◽  
Injury Score ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Level I ◽  
Initial Blood ◽  
Initial Blood Pressure ◽  
Abbreviated Injury Score

Patients with pelvic fractures (PF) have high incidences of associated injuries and mortality. To identify patients with PF at the highest risk for mortality on admission to a Level I trauma center, investigators analyzed 566 PF in 12,128 patients (1996 to 2005). PF were categorized on arrival as high risk (HR) or low risk (LR) by initial blood pressure, examination, radiographs, and CT. HR PF included open fractures, open-book injuries, PF 4 or greater abbreviated injury score, and hypotension (89 mmHg or less systolic blood pressure); all other cases were categorized as LR PF. Patients with PF had 6 per cent (35 of 566) mortality compared with 3 per cent (300 of 11,529) without PF. Mortality was 24 per cent (25 of 103) in HR PF, including 11 per cent (one of nine) of open fractures, 25 per cent (12 of 49) of open-book injuries, 23 per cent (14 of 62) of 4 or greater abbreviated injury score, and 33 per cent (20 of 60) of hypotensive patients compared with 3 per cent (13 of 454) of LR PF. Compared with LR PF, patients with HR PF were younger (43.5 vs 53.8 years) with higher injury severity scores (28.7 vs 11.9) and longer hospital stays (10.6 vs 7.4 days). PF mortality remains high despite treatment in a Level I trauma center. Trauma mechanism, initial blood pressure, pelvic radiography, and CT can be used to predict a patient's mortality risk.

The Impact of a Limb Preservation Service on the Incidence of Major Amputations for All Indications at a Level I Trauma Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 43-50
Author(s):  
Jake Hemingway ◽  
Rachel Hoffman ◽  
Benjamin Starnes ◽  
Elina Quiroga ◽  
Nam Tran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Limb Preservation ◽  
Level I ◽  
The Impact

Impact of Airbags on a Level I Trauma Center: Injury Patterns, Infectious Morbidity, and Hospital Costs

2008 ◽  
Vol 206 (5) ◽  
pp. 962-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regan F. Williams ◽  
Timothy C. Fabian ◽  
Peter E. Fischer ◽  
Ben L. Zarzaur ◽  
Louis J. Magnotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Injury Patterns ◽  
Infectious Morbidity ◽  
Level I

The impact of morbid obesity on solid organ injury in children using the ATOMAC protocol at a pediatric level I trauma center

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 345-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Vaughan ◽  
Jeff Tweed ◽  
Cynthia Greenwell ◽  
David M. Notrica ◽  
Crystal S. Langlais ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Morbid Obesity ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Solid Organ Injury ◽  
Level I ◽  
The Impact

A Contemporary Analysis of the Effect of Trauma Center Verification Level on Mortality in Severe Injury

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110234
Author(s):  
David S. Plurad ◽  
Glenn Geesman ◽  
Nicholas W. Sheets ◽  
Bhani Chawla-Kondal ◽  
Napatakamon Ayutyanont ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Severely Injured ◽  
Adult Age ◽  
Program Participant ◽  
Level Ii ◽  
Level I ◽  
Verification Process ◽  
Injured Patients ◽  
The Impact

Background Literature demonstrates increased mortality for the severely injured at a Level II vs. Level I center. Our objective is to reevaluate the impact of trauma center verification level on mortality for patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15 utilizing more contemporary data. We hypothesize that there would be no mortality discrepancy. Study Design Utilizing the ACS Trauma Quality Program Participant Use File admission year 2017, we identified severely injured (ISS >15) adult (age >15 years) patients treated at an ACS-verified Level I or Level II center. We excluded patients who underwent interfacility transfer. Logistic regression was performed to determine adjusted associations with mortality. Results There were 63 518 patients included, where 43 680 (68.8%) were treated at a Level I center and 19 838 (31.2%) at a Level II. Male gender (70.1%) and blunt injuries (92.0%) predominated. Level I admissions had a higher mean ISS [23.8 (±8.5) vs. 22.9 (±7.8), <.001], while Level II patients were older [mean age (y) 52.3 (±21.6) vs. 48.6 (±21.0), <.001] with multiple comorbidities (37.7% vs. 34.9%, <.001). Adjusted mortality between Level I and II centers was similar (12.0% vs. 11.8%, .570). Conclusions Despite previous findings, mortality outcomes are similar for severely injured patients treated at a Level I vs. Level II center. We theorize that this relates to mandated Level II resourcing as defined by an updated American College of Surgeons verification process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document