No difference in 13-year survival after medial pivot or central pivot mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. A propensity matched comparative analysis

Author(s):  
Jean-Yves Jenny ◽  
◽  
Michel Bercovy ◽  
Alain Cazenave ◽  
Thierry Gaillard ◽  
...  
10.29007/twl9 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Yves Jenny ◽  
Dominique Saragaglia ◽  
Thierry Gaillard ◽  
Frédéric Châtain

The survival rate of navigation-assisted mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty when mechanical revision was considered as the end-point wa snot impacted by the design, either central pivot or medial pivot.


Author(s):  
Nicola Pizza ◽  
Stefano Di Paolo ◽  
Raffaele Zinno ◽  
Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli ◽  
Piero Agostinone ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To investigate if postoperative clinical outcomes correlate with specific kinematic patterns after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery. The hypothesis was that the group of patients with higher clinical outcomes would have shown postoperative medial pivot kinematics, while the group of patients with lower clinical outcomes would have not. Methods 52 patients undergoing TKA surgery were prospectively evaluated at least a year of follow-up (13.5 ± 6.8 months) through clinical and functional Knee Society Score (KSS), and kinematically through dynamic radiostereometric analysis (RSA) during a sit-to-stand motor task. Patients received posterior-stabilized TKA design. Based on the result of the KSS, patients were divided into two groups: “KSS > 70 group”, patients with a good-to-excellent score (93.1 ± 6.8 points, n = 44); “KSS < 70 group”, patients with a fair-to-poor score (53.3 ± 18.3 points, n = 8). The anteroposterior (AP) low point (lowest femorotibial contact points) translation of medial and lateral femoral compartments was compared through Student’s t test (p < 0.05). Results Low point AP translation of the medial compartment was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than the lateral one in both the KSS > 70 (6.1 mm ± 4.4 mm vs 10.7 mm ± 4.6 mm) and the KSS < 70 groups (2.7 mm ± 3.5 mm vs 11.0 mm ± 5.6 mm). Furthermore, the AP translation of the lateral femoral compartment was not significantly different (p > 0.05) between the two groups, while the AP translation of the medial femoral compartment was significantly higher for the KSS > 70 group (p = 0.0442). Conclusion In the group of patients with a postoperative KSS < 70, the medial compartment translation was almost one-fourth of the lateral one. Surgeons should be aware that an over-constrained kinematic of the medial compartment might lead to lower clinical outcomes. Level of evidence II.


The Knee ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 496-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideo Kobayashi ◽  
Yasushi Akamatsu ◽  
Naoya Taki ◽  
Hirohiko Ota ◽  
Naoto Mitsugi ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard E. Jones ◽  
John G. Skedros ◽  
Angela J. Chan ◽  
Delbert H. Beauchamp ◽  
Paul C. Harkins

2021 ◽  
pp. 42-44
Author(s):  
Amol K Salve ◽  
Vinod Kumar Yadav ◽  
Ajay M Wankhade ◽  
Tanay Nahatkar ◽  
Sangam Jain

Intro- For TKA, there are two types of bearing designs: xed-bearing and mobile-bearing. Round femoral components articulate with a relatively at tibial articular surface in a xed-bearing knee design. Because the insert does not hinder the natural movements of the femoral component, the mobile-bearing (MB) TKA design is thought to allow more exibility of motion than the xed-bearing (FB) variety. Aim and objective: To compare xed bearing and mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Material and methods:This study is a prospective type of study done at Seth GS medical college Mumbai, Department of Orthopaedics during August 2019 to June 2021 on patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Patients who were to undergo total knee arthroplasty were invited to take part in the study. This study, done on them was explained in detail to them. An informed consent was obtained. Patients fullling the inclusion criteria were listed. Result: Range of motion achieved after mobile arthroplasty was 123.62±2.94 and in xed arthroplasty it was 121.96±2.74. Pain after last follow up in mobile arthroplasty was 48.83±0.62 and for xed arthroplasty was 47.39±0.86. Flexion gap after last follow up in mobile arthroplasty was 24.13±0.45 and in xed was 24.02±0.45. Stability was almost similar in both mobile and xed arthroplasty. Conclusions: there is no signicant difference between xed arthroplasty and mobile arthroplasty as far as Range of motion, Pain ,Flexion gap. Stability was almost similar in both mobile and xed arthroplasty.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 64-64
Author(s):  
Tara Moore ◽  
Nipun Sodhi ◽  
Angad Kalsi ◽  
Rushabh M. Vakharia ◽  
Joseph O. Ehiorobo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document