Multi-GNSS triple-frequency differential code bias (DCB) determination with precise point positioning (PPP)

2018 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 765-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teng Liu ◽  
Baocheng Zhang ◽  
Yunbin Yuan ◽  
Zishen Li ◽  
Ningbo Wang
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Differential Code Bias ◽  
Triple Frequency ◽  
Code Bias ◽  
Point Positioning

Performance Analysis of GPS/BDS Precise Point Positioning

2015 ◽  
Vol 713-715 ◽  
pp. 1123-1126
Author(s):  
Xiao Yu Li ◽  
Jun Wang ◽  
Ya Tao Liu
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Satellite Orbit ◽  
Gps Measurements ◽  
Differential Code Bias ◽  
Phase Offset ◽  
Antenna Phase ◽  
Offset Correction ◽  
Code Bias ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Processing Steps

Precise Point Positioning (PPP) with GPS measurements has achieved a level of success. In order to benefit from the multiple available constellations, research has been undertaken to combineGPS and BDS measurements in PPP processing.Mathematical models of GPS/BDS combined precise point positioning are introduced in this paper. GPS/BDS combined PPP models are developed based on the GPS-only PPP. The data pre-processing steps include applying satellite orbit and clock corrections, satellite antenna phase offset correction, receiver antenna phase offset correction, differential code bias corrections, troposphere delay corrections and the the Ionosphere-free observation combination is used. The results show that the positioning precision and convergence speed of GPS/BDS combined PPP are improved compared with GPS-only PPP.

Initial Performance Evaluation of Precise Point Positioning with Triple-Frequency Observations from BDS-2 and BDS-3 Satellites

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 763-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenjie Zhang ◽  
Hongzhen Yang ◽  
Chen He ◽  
Zhiqiang Wang ◽  
Weiping Shao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Basic Model ◽  
Triple Frequency ◽  
Ionosphere Model ◽  
Receiver Clock ◽  
Combined Solution ◽  
Code Bias ◽  
Point Positioning

This paper presents an investigation of the precise point positioning (PPP) performance of a combined solution from BDS-2 and BDS-3 satellites. To simultaneously process different BDS signal observations, i.e., B1/B1C, B2/B2a and B3C, undifferenced and uncombined observations with ionosphere delay constrained by the deterministic plus stochastic ionosphere model are used in the basic model. Special attention is paid to code bias and receiver clock parameters in the derivation of the observation model. The analysis is carried out using more than one-month data for BDS-2 and BDS-3 collected at the CANB, DWIN, KNDY and PETH stations in the Asia-Pacific region. The results suggest that compared with BDS-2 alone, the BDS-2 and BDS-3 solution provides significantly more accurate PPP, with increases of 28%, 21% and 5% in the up, north and east directions, respectively. In addition, the average root mean square error decreases to 0·21, 0·13 and 0·16 m for the three directions. Furthermore, the PPP convergence time for BDS-2 and BDS-3 is about 1·5 h and less than 1 h for the horizontal and vertical components, respectively, whereas that for BDS-2 alone is about 2·3 h for both directions.

scholarly journals Advantages of Uncombined Precise Point Positioning with Fixed Ambiguity Resolution for Slant Total Electron Content (STEC) and Differential Code Bias (DCB) Estimation

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Wang ◽  
Guanwen Huang ◽  
Peiyuan Zhou ◽  
Yuanxi Yang ◽  
Qin Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Electron Content ◽  
Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Electron Content ◽  
Total Electron ◽  
Differential Code Bias ◽  
Ionosphere Modeling ◽  
Code Bias ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Slant Total Electron Content

The determination of slant total electron content (STEC) between satellites and receivers is the first step for establishing an ionospheric model. However, the leveling errors, caused by the smoothed ambiguity solutions in the carrier-to-code leveling (CCL) method, degrade the performance of ionosphere modeling and differential code bias (DCB) estimation. To reduce the leveling errors, an uncombined and undifferenced precise point positioning (PPP) method with ambiguity resolution (AR) was used to directly extract the STEC. Firstly, the ionospheric observables were estimated with CCL, PPP float-ambiguity solutions, and PPP fixed-ambiguity solutions, respectively, to analyze the short-term temporal variation of receiver DCB in zero or short baselines. Then, the global ionospheric map (GIM) was modeled using three types of ionospheric observables based on the single-layer model (SLM) assumption. Compared with the CCL method, the slight variations of receiver DCBs can be obviously distinguished using high precise ionospheric observables, with a 58.4% and 71.2% improvement of the standard deviation (STD) for PPP float-ambiguity and fixed-ambiguity solutions, respectively. For ionosphere modeling, the 24.7% and 27.9% improvements for posteriori residuals were achieved for PPP float-ambiguity and fixed-ambiguity solutions, compared to the CCL method. The corresponding improvement for residuals of the vertical total electron contents (VTECs) compared with the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) final GIM products in global accuracy was 9.2% and 13.7% for PPP float-ambiguity and fixed-ambiguity solutions, respectively. The results show that the PPP fixed-ambiguity solution is the best one for the GIM product modeling and satellite DCBs estimation.

scholarly journals The Effect of BDS-3 Time Group Delay and Differential Code Bias Corrections on Positioning

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Peipei Dai ◽  
Jianping Xing ◽  
Yulong Ge ◽  
Xuhai Yang ◽  
Weijin Qin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Group Delay ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Differential Code Bias ◽  
Receiver Clock ◽  
Code Bias ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
The Impact

The timing group delay parameter (TGD) or differential code bias parameter (DCB) is an important factor that affects the performance of GNSS basic services; therefore, TGD and DCB must be taken seriously. Moreover, the TGD parameter is modulated in the navigation message, taking into account the impact of TGD on the performance of the basic service. International GNSS Monitoring and Assessment System (iGMAS) provides the broadcast ephemeris with TGD parameter and the Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) provides DCB products. In this paper, the current available BDS-3 TGD and DCB parameters are firstly described in detail, and the relationship of TGD and DCB for BDS-3 is figured out. Then, correction models of BDS-3 TGD and DCB in standard point positioning (SPP) or precise point positioning (PPP) are given, which can be applied in various situations. For the effects of TGD and DCB in the SPP and PPP solution processes, all the signals from BDS-3 were researched, and the validity of TGD and DCB has been further verified. The experimental results show that the accuracy of B1I, B1C and B2a single-frequency SPP with TGD or DCB correction was improved by approximately 12–60%. TGD will not be considered for B3I single-frequency, because the broadcast satellite clock offset is based on the B3I as the reference signal. The positioning accuracy of B1I/B3I and B1C/B2a dual-frequency SPP showed that the improvement range for horizontal components is 60.2% to 74.4%, and the vertical components improved by about 50% after the modification of TGD and DCB. In addition, most of the uncorrected code biases are mostly absorbed into the receiver clock bias and other parameters for PPP, resulting in longer convergence time. The convergence time can be max increased by up to 50% when the DCB parameters are corrected. Consequently, the positioning accuracy can reach the centimeter level after convergence, but it is critical for PPP convergence time and receiver clock bias that the TGD and DCB correction be considered seriously.

scholarly journals GPS + Galileo + BeiDou precise point positioning with triple-frequency ambiguity resolution

GPS Solutions ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pan Li ◽  
Xinyuan Jiang ◽  
Xiaohong Zhang ◽  
Maorong Ge ◽  
Harald Schuh
Keyword(s):  
Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Triple Frequency ◽  
Point Positioning

scholarly journals Triple-Frequency Combining Observation Models and Performance in Precise Point Positioning Using Real BDS Data

IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 69826-69836
Author(s):  
Honglei Qin ◽  
Peng Liu ◽  
Li Cong ◽  
Wanqing Ji
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Triple Frequency ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
And Performance

scholarly journals Investigation and Validation of the Time-Varying Characteristic for the GPS Differential Code Bias

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haojun Li ◽  
Jingxin Xiao ◽  
Weidong Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Single Point ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Differential Code Bias ◽  
Triple Frequency ◽  
Code Bias ◽  
Constant Part ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Better Than

The time-varying characteristic of the bias in the GPS code observation is investigated using triple-frequency observations. The method for estimating the combined code bias is presented and the twelve-month (1 January–31 December 2016) triple-frequency GPS data set from 114 International GNSS Service (IGS) stations is processed to analyze the characteristic of the combined code bias. The results show that the main periods of the combined code bias are 12, 8, 6, 4, 4.8 and 2.67 h. The time-varying characteristic of the combined code bias, which is the combination of differential code bias (DCB) (P1–P5) and DCB (P1–P2), shows that the real satellite DCBs are also time-varying. The difference between the two sets of the computed constant parts of the combined code bias, with the IGS DCB products of DCB (P1–P2) and DCB (P1–P2) and the mean of the estimated 24-h combined code bias series, further show that the combined code bias cannot be replaced by the DCB (P1–P2) and DCB (P1–P5) products. The time-varying part of inter-frequency clock bias (IFCB) can be estimated by the phase and code observations and the phase based IFCB is the combinations of the triple-frequency satellite uncalibrated phase delays (UPDs) and the code-based IFCB is the function of the DCBs. The performances of the computed the IFCB with different methods in single point positioning indicate that the accuracy for the constant part of the combined code bias is reduced, when the IGS DCB products are used to compute. These performances also show that the time-varying part of IFCB estimated with phase observation is better than that of code observation. The predicted results show that 98% of the predicted constant part of the combined code bias can be corrected and the attenuation of the predicted accuracy is much less evident. However, the accuracy of the predicted time-varying part decreases significantly with the predicted time.

Correction model of BDS satellite-induced code bias and its impact on precise point positioning

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 2155-2163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Chen ◽  
Dongjie Yue ◽  
Shaolin Zhu ◽  
Hao Chen ◽  
Zhiqiang Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Correction Model ◽  
Code Bias ◽  
Point Positioning

Modeling of multi-sensor tightly aided BDS triple-frequency precise point positioning and initial assessments

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 184-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhouzheng Gao ◽  
Maorong Ge ◽  
You Li ◽  
Yuanjin Pan ◽  
Qijin Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Triple Frequency ◽  
Point Positioning
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document