Investigating the cumulative effects of multiple stressors on fish assemblages in a semi-enclosed bay

2020 ◽  
Vol 167 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasha K. Whitmarsh ◽  
Charlie Huveneers ◽  
Peter G. Fairweather
2000 ◽  
Vol 279 (1) ◽  
pp. E44-E49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin D. Laugero ◽  
Gary P. Moberg

To address the hypothesis that multiple stressors can have cumulative effects on the individual, we determined the effects of restraint (R) stress (4 h/day for 7 days), immunological (L) stress [lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection, 0.45 μg/g body wt on days 6 and 7], and R + L (RL) on the growth and energetics of C57Bl/6 male mice. R and L each repeatedly increased ( P < 0.05) circulating corticosterone (>8 times), but RL caused even greater (>250%, P < 0.05) concentrations of circulating corticosterone than did either stressor alone. Only L and RL increased ( P < 0.05) circulating interleukin-1β. Although R, L, and RL impaired growth (>75% below controls, P < 0.05), RL reduced growth to a greater extent. All stressors inhibited ( P < 0.05) lean (>33% below controls) and fat (>120% below controls) energy deposition, and like the effects on growth, combined RL stress inhibited lean and fat energy deposition to a greater extent than did either stressor acting alone. These results demonstrated that the summation of multiple stress results in a cumulative cost to the growing animal.


Author(s):  
Martin J. Jennings ◽  
Michael A. Bozek ◽  
Gene R. Hatzenbeler ◽  
Edward E. Emmons ◽  
Michael D. Staggs

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 227-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Kreutzweiser ◽  
Frederick Beall ◽  
Kara Webster ◽  
Dean Thompson ◽  
Irena Creed

Conservation efforts to sustain water resources and aquatic biodiversity in boreal watersheds will require reliable information on the recent status of various indicator species and an improved understanding of the risks to aquatic biodiversity posed by resource development activities. We reviewed the recent state of knowledge on the responses of aquatic biodiversity to forest management, pulp and paper mill effluents, hydroelectric impoundments, mining of minerals and metals, oil sands extractions, and peat mining and offer a prognosis for aquatic biodiversity under each of these environmental stressors. Despite the prevalence of natural resource development in Canada’s largest forest ecosystem, there was a limited amount of published literature on the effects of many of the disturbance types on various indicators of aquatic biodiversity, making it difficult to produce a current and reliable status assessment. Across most of the boreal zone, there is a lack of coordinated, consistent data collection for many of the bioindicators and disturbance types discussed in this review. Forecasting the future state of aquatic biodiversity across the boreal zone is challenged by increasing natural resource development and its interactions with other stressors, especially climate change. The cumulative effects of multiple stressors coupled with resource development activities in boreal watersheds remain largely unknown. More importantly, the ecological thresholds for these cumulative effects (that is, the point at which aquatic ecosystems and their biodiversity cannot recover to a desired state within a reasonable time frame) are also unknown and remain gaps in our knowledge. The recent literature identifies a number of risks to aquatic biodiversity at local (tens of square kilometres) to regional (hundreds of square kilometres) scales associated with natural resource development. There are indications that many of these risks can be minimized by “greener” technologies for resource development and reclamation, practical conservation planning and regulation, and increased stewardship in watershed management, although the effectiveness of many of these measures cannot yet be assessed from the published literature.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea R. Norris ◽  
Leonardo Frid ◽  
Chloé Debyser ◽  
Krista L. De Groot ◽  
Jeffrey Thomas ◽  
...  

To halt ongoing loss in biodiversity, there is a need for landscape-level management recommendations that address cumulative impacts of anthropogenic and natural disturbances on wildlife habitat. We examined the cumulative effects of logging, roads, land-use change, fire, and bark beetle outbreaks on future habitat for olive-sided flycatcher (Contopus cooperi), a steeply declining aerial insectivorous songbird, in Canada’s western boreal forest. To predict the occurrence of olive-sided flycatcher we developed a suite of habitat suitability models using point count surveys (1997–2011) spatially- and temporally-matched with forest inventory data. Flycatcher occurrence was positively associated with small (∼10 ha) 10- to 20-year-old clearcuts, and with 10–100% tree mortality due to mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) outbreaks, but we found no association with roads or distance to water. We used the parameter estimates from the best-fit habitat suitability models to inform spatially explicit state-and-transition simulation models to project change in habitat availability from 2020 to 2050 under six alternative scenarios (three management × two fire alternatives). The simulation models projected that the cumulative effects of land use conversion, forest harvesting, and fire will reduce the area of olive-sided flycatcher habitat by 16–18% under Business As Usual management scenarios and by 11–13% under scenarios that include protection of 30% of the land base. Scenarios limiting the size of all clearcuts to ≤10 ha resulted in a median habitat loss of 4–6%, but projections were highly variable. Under all three management alternatives, a 50% increase in fire frequency (expected due to climate change) exacerbated habitat loss. The projected losses of habitat in western boreal forest, even with an increase in protected areas, imply that reversing the ongoing population declines of olive-sided flycatcher and other migratory birds will require attention to forest management beyond protected areas. Further work should examine the effects of multiple stressors on the demographic mechanisms driving change in aerial insectivore populations, including stressors on the wintering grounds in South America, and should aim to adapt the design of protected areas and forest management policies to projected climate-driven increases in the size and frequency of wildfires.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (5) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Friedhelm Krupp* ◽  
Abdurrahman M.A. Almuftah ◽  
Kent E. Carpenter ◽  
Jack R. Buchanan ◽  
Gina M. Ralph

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Kefford ◽  
Susan J. Nichols ◽  
Richard Duncan

Biodiversity is declining, typically because of multiple anthropogenic stressors. Cumulative effects of multiple stressors are classified as additive, when cumulative effects are as expected from the stressor’s singular effects, synergistic when greater than additive or antagonistic when less than additive. Less attention has been given to the consistency of cumulative effects. We analysed stream insects, Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (EPT) data from two habitats spanning a 3,600 km latitudinal (S11◦-S43◦) gradient in eastern Australia. We found that the cumulative effect of salinity and suspended sediments on EPT family richness was inconsistent with additive, synergistic or antagonistic effects, and the reduction EPT family richness from increasing both stressors varied (48-70%) depending on habitat (riffle vs. edge), water temperature and terrain slope. Studies of cumulative effects of multiple stressors at one location risk not describing cumulative effects elsewhere and ecologists should consider the spatial consistency of multiple stressors.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
C. Lisa Mahon ◽  
Shawna Pelech

Landscapes in Canada are undergoing change due to resource and land use stressors and climate stressors. Understanding the cumulative effects of these stressors is challenging because of the complexity of ecosystems, the variability of stressors, and species response to individual or multiple stressors. A key challenge within the field of cumulative effects assessment (CEA) is guidance that describes and evaluates analytical methods. In this review we discuss four broad categories of methods with current or potential use for project-based and effects-based CEA for species in terrestrial systems: (i) qualitative review, (ii) habitat supply models, (iii) empirical species–stressor models, and (iv) decision support models. We describe each method and provide examples, highlight advantages and limitations, identify how methods address key science-based CEA questions, and provide direction on when and why to use specific CEA methods. Empirical species–stressor models and decision support models are the only analytical approaches that provide answers to many science-based CEA questions including how multiple stressors combine to affect an individual species and the certainty of multiple stressor effects. We provide recommendations for using one or more methods as complementary building blocks to fill data gaps, improve understanding and communication, engage diverse partner groups, and increase the quality and credibility of the CEA. Our review supports a move toward regional scale, effects-based CEA where partner collaboration to design, implement, and analyze comprehensive assessments of multiple stressors will (i) expand our knowledge of terrestrial species response to stressors and (ii) inform best management practices for resource industries and conservation and management actions for land managers.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa A. Venier ◽  
Russ Walton ◽  
James Peter Brandt

Traditionally, forest management has focused on forestry-related practices while other industries have been managed separately. Forest management requires the integration of all natural resource development activities, along with other anthropogenic and natural forest disturbances (e.g., climate change, pollution, wildfire, pest disturbance) to understand how human activities can change forested ecosystems. The term cumulative effects has been used to describe these attempts to integrate all disturbances to develop an understanding of past, current and future impacts on environmental, social and economic components of the system. In this review, we focus on the science required to understand the past, current and future impacts of the cumulative effects of anthropogenic and natural disturbances on forested ecosystems or their components. We have primarily focused on the terrestrial system with an emphasis on northern forests in Canada. Our paper is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all cumulative effects science but a synthesis of the challenges and approaches currently being used. Central repositories were identified as an approach to deal with issues of availability of remotely sensed data on anthropogenic and natural disturbances. Data integration projects, open data and well-designed large-scale data collection efforts are needed to provide sufficient data on environmental responses to cumulative effects. As well, large-scale integrated, modularized ecosystem models are needed to bring stressor and environmental response data together to explore responses to, and interactions between, multiple stressors, to project these effects into the future, and to identify future data collection needs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document