CaCO 3 scaling in AISI 316 stainless steel tubes - effect of thermal and hydraulic parameters on the induction time and growth rate

1998 ◽  
Vol 34 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 163-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. O. Budair ◽  
M. S. Khan ◽  
S. M. Zubair ◽  
A. K. Sheikh ◽  
A. Quddus
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Induction Time ◽  
Hydraulic Parameters ◽  
Steel Tubes ◽  
316 Stainless Steel ◽  
Aisi 316 Stainless Steel ◽  
Aisi 316

A parametric study of CaCO 3 scaling in AISI 316 stainless steel tubes

2001 ◽  
Vol 38 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 115-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sultan Khan ◽  
M. O. Budair ◽  
S. M. Zubair
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Parametric Study ◽  
Steel Tubes ◽  
316 Stainless Steel ◽  
Aisi 316 Stainless Steel ◽  
Aisi 316

scholarly journals Breakdown and Evolution of the Protective Oxide Scales of AISI 304 and AISI 316 Stainless Steels under High-Temperature Oxidation

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. A. Habib ◽  
M. S. Damra ◽  
J. J. Saura ◽  
I. Cervera ◽  
J. Bellés
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Breakdown Point ◽  
304 Stainless Steel ◽  
Aisi 304 Stainless Steel ◽  
Protective Oxide ◽  
Aisi 304 ◽  
316 Stainless Steel ◽  
Aisi 316 Stainless Steel ◽  
Aisi 316

The failure of the protective oxide scales of AISI 304 and AISI 316 stainless steels has been studied and compared at 1,000°C in synthetic air. First, the isothermal thermogravimetric curves of both stainless steels were plotted to determine the time needed to reach the breakdown point. The different resistance of each stainless steel was interpreted on the basis of the nature of the crystalline phases formed, the morphology, and the surface structure as well as the cross-section structure of the oxidation products. The weight gain of AISI 304 stainless steel was about 8 times greater than that of AISI 316 stainless steel, and AISI 316 stainless steel reached the breakdown point about 40 times more slowly than AISI 304 stainless steel. In both stainless steels, reaching the breakdown point meant the loss of the protective oxide scale of Cr2O3, but whereas in AISI 304 stainless steel the Cr2O3scale totally disappeared and exclusively Fe2O3was formed, in AISI 316 stainless steel some Cr2O3persisted and Fe3O4was mainly formed, which means that AISI 316 stainless steel is more resistant to oxidation after the breakdown.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document