In Situ Dynamics and Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Bacterial Communities Under Different Crop Residue Management

2010 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noémie Pascault ◽  
Bernard Nicolardot ◽  
Fabiola Bastian ◽  
Pascal Thiébeau ◽  
Lionel Ranjard ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (11) ◽  
pp. 3685-3691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier A. Ceja-Navarro ◽  
Flor N. Rivera-Ordu�a ◽  
Leonardo Pati�o-Z��iga ◽  
Ant�n Vila-Sanjurjo ◽  
Jos� Crossa ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Bacterial communities are important not only in the cycling of organic compounds but also in maintaining ecosystems. Specific bacterial groups can be affected as a result of changes in environmental conditions caused by human activities, such as agricultural practices. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of different forms of tillage and residue management on soil bacterial communities by using phylogenetic and multivariate analyses. Treatments involving zero tillage (ZT) and conventional tillage (CT) with their respective combinations of residue management, i.e., removed residue (−R) and kept residue (+R), and maize/wheat rotation, were selected from a long-term field trial started in 1991. Analysis of bacterial diversity showed that soils under zero tillage and crop residue retention (ZT/+R) had the highest levels of diversity and richness. Multivariate analysis showed that beneficial bacterial groups such as fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. and Burkholderiales were favored by residue retention (ZT/+R and CT/+R) and negatively affected by residue removal (ZT/−R). Zero-tillage treatments (ZT/+R and ZT/−R) had a positive effect on the Rhizobiales group, with its main representatives related to Methylosinus spp. known as methane-oxidizing bacteria. It can be concluded that practices that include reduced tillage and crop residue retention can be adopted as safer agricultural practices to preserve and improve the diversity of soil bacterial communities.


2016 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosef Chávez-Romero ◽  
Yendi E. Navarro-Noya ◽  
Silvia C. Reynoso-Martínez ◽  
Yohana Sarria-Guzmán ◽  
Bram Govaerts ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 86-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yendi E. Navarro-Noya ◽  
Selene Gómez-Acata ◽  
Nina Montoya-Ciriaco ◽  
Aketzally Rojas-Valdez ◽  
Mayra C. Suárez-Arriaga ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanat Kumar Dwibedi ◽  
Mahendra Kumar Mohanty ◽  
Vimal Chandra Pandey ◽  
Donakonda Divyasree

Among the field crops, cereals being the staple food for humans and feed for cattle, occupy 50.8 per cent of the cultivated land and contribute 52.5 per cent of the body calories. Cereals are the good source of carbohydrate, minerals, and dietary fibre for humans and animals. With the ever growing human population the agricultural production and agri-wastes are increasing across the globe. In Asia, Africa and Latin America, near about 66, 21 and 13 per cent of total estimated 2,060 Tg of biomass are generated every year. Burning has been the cheapest, simplest, easiest and quickest way of eliminating bulky unwanted biomass in-situ before raising of the succeeding crop(s). Rice, wheat, sugarcane and maize constitute 24, 23, 5 and 48 per cent of the global burnt residues. Although killing of problematic weeds, insects, and pathogens, and addition of valuable plant nutrients are the very basic objectives of this anthropogenic post-harvest residue management strategy but it releases noxious gases into the atmosphere polluting air and contributing to the global warming. Shorter sowing windows very often compel the farmers to remove crop residues through burning, especially in absence of alternative options for its productive and profitable disposal. Rising labour cost and their seasonal scarcity sometimes also insist the farmers to burn crop residues. However, stringent punitive actions have yet failed to curb such open burning in many countries in absence of the farmers’ friendly and financially viable options of crop residue management. In this chapter, attempts have been made to elucidate various sustainable crop residue management strategies in cereal systems.


Author(s):  
Guru Prem ◽  
Ramesh Kumar ◽  
Amit Kumar ◽  
Anurag . ◽  
Upasana Singh ◽  
...  

The farmers generally burn the rice residue to vacate their fields for the timely sowing of wheat, because residues interfere with tillage and seeding operations. In Haryana, approximated 27.83 million tons of agricultural residues are produced and out of which 11.22 million ton is surplus every year. The residue of crop can play an important role in the cycling of nutrients as rice straw at harvest contains significant amount of nutrients. Government of India initiated Central Sector Scheme on “Promotion of Agricultural Mechanization for In-Situ Management of Crop Residue” in the states of Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and NCT of Delhi during the year 2018 to curb the residue burning. In this scheme, farmers were appraised to set up Custom Hiring Centers (CHCs) at subsidized rates. The subsidy on the selected crop residue management related machinery/ implements were directly deposited to the accounts of farmers. Information about the scheme was spread via latest ICT tools among the farmers of Ambala district. Hands on training programmes were imparted to CHC owners by Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) for the efficient operation of the machinery/implements during sowing of next crop by mulching or incorporation of the residue.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Te Lin ◽  
Yu-Fei Lin ◽  
Isheng J. Tsai ◽  
Ed-Haun Chang ◽  
Shih-Hao Jien ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 309 ◽  
pp. 107285
Author(s):  
Mengyu Gao ◽  
Jinfeng Yang ◽  
Chunmei Liu ◽  
Bowen Gu ◽  
Meng Han ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document