Total and denitrifying bacterial communities associated with the interception of nitrate leaching by carbon amendment in the subsoil

2021 ◽  
Vol 105 (6) ◽  
pp. 2559-2572
Author(s):  
Chen Chen ◽  
Hui Han ◽  
Ya Meng ◽  
Haiqing Gong ◽  
Rui Jia ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Chen ◽  
Hui Han ◽  
Ya Meng ◽  
Hangyu Wu ◽  
Rui Jia ◽  
...  

Abstract The authors have withdrawn this preprint from Research Square


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Chen ◽  
Hui Han ◽  
Ya Meng ◽  
Hangyu Wu ◽  
Rui Jia ◽  
...  

Abstract Nitrate leaching is severe in greenhouse agriculture where excessive nitrogen is often applied to maintain high crop productivities. Carbon amendment in the subsoil, where denitrification is limited by the availability of carbon, might mitigate nitrate leaching. In this study, we investigated the effects of carbon amendment in the subsoil on nitrate leaching and the emission of greenhouse gases (CH 4 and N 2 O) emissions using a soil column experiment. Diversity and abundance of total and nirS-, nirK- , and nosZ -type denitrifying bacteria were investigated by high throughput sequencing of PCR amplicons and quantitative real-time PCR. The amounts of nitrate leaching were >39% less in the treatments with carbon amendment than in the non-amended control without fertilization or in treatments fertilized by two doses (1600 or 3200 kg N ha - 1 ) of ammonia or nitrate. No effects of carbon amendment on the emissions of CH 4 or N 2 O were observed. The total N content in the subsoil zone with carbon amendment increased from 20.74% to 70.54%. Strikingly, the abundance of nirS , nosZ and 16S rRNA was higher in the treatment than the corresponding controls while no significant effects were detected for nirK . Carbon amendment rather than fertilization was the primary factor that influenced the community composition of the three denitrifying bacterial communities and explained 14%, 10%, and 4% of the variation in the community of nosZ, nirS , and nirK, respectively. Decreased alpha-diversity and increased variability in beta-diversity were observed for the carbon amended treatment for total and denitrifying bacteria. On average, genera such as Anaerovorax, Pseudobacteroides, Magnetospirillum, Prolixibacter, Sporobacter, Ignavibacterium, Syntrophobacter, Oxobacter, Hydrogenispora, Desulfosporomusa, Mangrovibacterium, and Sporomusa were enriched more than seven times in soil amended with carbon. In summary, carbon amendment in the subsoil mitigated nitrate leaching and increased the nitrogen pool by possible activation of denitrifying and anaerobic bacterial populations.


Author(s):  
Cecile De Klein ◽  
Jim Paton ◽  
Stewart Ledgard

Strategic de-stocking in winter is a common management practice on dairy farms in Southland, New Zealand, to protect the soil against pugging damage. This paper examines whether this practice can also be used to reduce nitrate leaching losses. Model analyses and field measurements were used to estimate nitrate leaching losses and pasture production under two strategic de-stocking regimes: 3 months off-farm or 5 months on a feed pad with effluent collected and applied back to the land. The model analyses, based on the results of a long-term farmlet study under conventional grazing and on information for an average New Zealand farm, suggested that the 3- or 5-month de-stocking could reduce nitrate leaching losses by about 20% or 35-50%, respectively compared to a conventional grazing system. Field measurements on the Taieri Plain in Otago support these findings, although the results to date are confounded by drought conditions during the 1998 and 1999 seasons. The average nitrate concentration of the drainage water of a 5-month strategic de-stocking treatment was about 60% lower than under conventional grazing. Pasture production of the 5-month strategic de-stocking regime with effluent return was estimated based on data for apparent N efficiency of excreta patches versus uniformlyspread farm dairy effluent N. The results suggested that a strategic de-stocking regime could increase pasture production by about 2 to 8%. A cost/ benefit analysis of the 5-month de-stocking system using a feed pad, comparing additional capital and operational costs with additional income from a 5% increase in DM production, show a positive return on capital for an average New Zealand dairy farm. This suggests that a strategic destocking system has good potential as a management tool to reduce nitrate leaching losses in nitrate sensitive areas whilst being economically viable, particularly on farms where an effluent application system or a feed pad are already in place. Keywords: dairying, feed pads, nitrate leaching, nitrogen efficiency, productivity, strategic de-stocking


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document