scholarly journals Taxonomic and denitrifying bacteria communities associated with the interception of nitrate leaching by carbon amendment in the subsoil

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Chen ◽  
Hui Han ◽  
Ya Meng ◽  
Hangyu Wu ◽  
Rui Jia ◽  
...  

Abstract The authors have withdrawn this preprint from Research Square

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Chen ◽  
Hui Han ◽  
Ya Meng ◽  
Hangyu Wu ◽  
Rui Jia ◽  
...  

Abstract Nitrate leaching is severe in greenhouse agriculture where excessive nitrogen is often applied to maintain high crop productivities. Carbon amendment in the subsoil, where denitrification is limited by the availability of carbon, might mitigate nitrate leaching. In this study, we investigated the effects of carbon amendment in the subsoil on nitrate leaching and the emission of greenhouse gases (CH 4 and N 2 O) emissions using a soil column experiment. Diversity and abundance of total and nirS-, nirK- , and nosZ -type denitrifying bacteria were investigated by high throughput sequencing of PCR amplicons and quantitative real-time PCR. The amounts of nitrate leaching were >39% less in the treatments with carbon amendment than in the non-amended control without fertilization or in treatments fertilized by two doses (1600 or 3200 kg N ha - 1 ) of ammonia or nitrate. No effects of carbon amendment on the emissions of CH 4 or N 2 O were observed. The total N content in the subsoil zone with carbon amendment increased from 20.74% to 70.54%. Strikingly, the abundance of nirS , nosZ and 16S rRNA was higher in the treatment than the corresponding controls while no significant effects were detected for nirK . Carbon amendment rather than fertilization was the primary factor that influenced the community composition of the three denitrifying bacterial communities and explained 14%, 10%, and 4% of the variation in the community of nosZ, nirS , and nirK, respectively. Decreased alpha-diversity and increased variability in beta-diversity were observed for the carbon amended treatment for total and denitrifying bacteria. On average, genera such as Anaerovorax, Pseudobacteroides, Magnetospirillum, Prolixibacter, Sporobacter, Ignavibacterium, Syntrophobacter, Oxobacter, Hydrogenispora, Desulfosporomusa, Mangrovibacterium, and Sporomusa were enriched more than seven times in soil amended with carbon. In summary, carbon amendment in the subsoil mitigated nitrate leaching and increased the nitrogen pool by possible activation of denitrifying and anaerobic bacterial populations.


1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 227-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. D. Adelman ◽  
M. A. Tabidian

A potential buildup of nitrate in the ground water resources of the eastern Sandhills of Nebraska has been projected to occur due to the intensive use of nitrogen fertilizer on irrigated cropland. A root-zone nitrate leaching study in this area revealed that soils with a high carbon concentration had minimal leaching compared to soils with lower concentrations. Soils high in carbon have an active population of denitrifying bacteria possibly causing denitrification and in turn reduction of nitrate leaching. Denitrifying bacteria are principally heterotrophic using soil organic carbon for both an energy and carbon source. The objective of this research was to interpret how root-zone denitrification affected nitrate leaching and ground water contamination by nitrate. A modified version of a solute transport model developed for the Eastern Sandhills was used to assess the risk of nitrate contamination for combinations of fertilizer and irrigation rates and for various soil carbon levels. The first attempt was to make risk assessment with eight farm management practices for cells with increasingly greater carbon levels until only those cells with the greatest carbon level were kept in production. Results of this assessment showed that even with excessive fertilizer and irrigation rates, risk of nitrate leaching was reduced as the minimum carbon level was increased. However, since less cropland was leaching nitrate with each successive risk calculation, the impact that root-zone denitrification had in nitrate leaching reduction could not be definitively determined. This prompted a model modification of the risk calculation procedure which kept all cropland in production and computed nitrate leachate risk for increasingly higher artificial carbon levels during successive risk calculations. Changing carbon levels was still more detrimental on nitrate leaching rates than changing farm management practices.


2021 ◽  
Vol 105 (6) ◽  
pp. 2559-2572
Author(s):  
Chen Chen ◽  
Hui Han ◽  
Ya Meng ◽  
Haiqing Gong ◽  
Rui Jia ◽  
...  

1900 ◽  
Vol 50 (1303supp) ◽  
pp. 20889-20890
Author(s):  
G. Ampola ◽  
C. Ulpiani

Author(s):  
Cecile De Klein ◽  
Jim Paton ◽  
Stewart Ledgard

Strategic de-stocking in winter is a common management practice on dairy farms in Southland, New Zealand, to protect the soil against pugging damage. This paper examines whether this practice can also be used to reduce nitrate leaching losses. Model analyses and field measurements were used to estimate nitrate leaching losses and pasture production under two strategic de-stocking regimes: 3 months off-farm or 5 months on a feed pad with effluent collected and applied back to the land. The model analyses, based on the results of a long-term farmlet study under conventional grazing and on information for an average New Zealand farm, suggested that the 3- or 5-month de-stocking could reduce nitrate leaching losses by about 20% or 35-50%, respectively compared to a conventional grazing system. Field measurements on the Taieri Plain in Otago support these findings, although the results to date are confounded by drought conditions during the 1998 and 1999 seasons. The average nitrate concentration of the drainage water of a 5-month strategic de-stocking treatment was about 60% lower than under conventional grazing. Pasture production of the 5-month strategic de-stocking regime with effluent return was estimated based on data for apparent N efficiency of excreta patches versus uniformlyspread farm dairy effluent N. The results suggested that a strategic de-stocking regime could increase pasture production by about 2 to 8%. A cost/ benefit analysis of the 5-month de-stocking system using a feed pad, comparing additional capital and operational costs with additional income from a 5% increase in DM production, show a positive return on capital for an average New Zealand dairy farm. This suggests that a strategic destocking system has good potential as a management tool to reduce nitrate leaching losses in nitrate sensitive areas whilst being economically viable, particularly on farms where an effluent application system or a feed pad are already in place. Keywords: dairying, feed pads, nitrate leaching, nitrogen efficiency, productivity, strategic de-stocking


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document