Bone density distribution and gender dominate femoral neck fracture risk predictors

2000 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. D. Cody ◽  
G. W. Divine ◽  
K. Nahigian ◽  
M. Kleerekoper
2013 ◽  
Vol 71 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. 595.2-595
Author(s):  
A.G.S. Oldroyd ◽  
M. Nickkho-Amiry ◽  
B. Evans ◽  
C. Greenbank ◽  
M. Bukhari

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (1) ◽  
pp. 104-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Bülow ◽  
P. Cnudde ◽  
C. Rogmark ◽  
O. Rolfson ◽  
S. Nemes

Aims Our aim was to examine the Elixhauser and Charlson comorbidity indices, based on administrative data available before surgery, and to establish their predictive value for mortality for patients who underwent hip arthroplasty in the management of a femoral neck fracture. Patients and Methods We analyzed data from 42 354 patients from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register between 2005 and 2012. Only the first operated hip was included for patients with bilateral arthroplasty. We obtained comorbidity data by linkage from the Swedish National Patient Register, as well as death dates from the national population register. We used univariable Cox regression models to predict mortality based on the comorbidity indices, as well as multivariable regression with age and gender. Predictive power was evaluated by a concordance index, ranging from 0.5 to 1 (with the higher value being the better predictive power). A concordance index less than 0.7 was considered poor. We used bootstrapping for internal validation of the results. Results The predictive power of mortality was poor for both the Elixhauser and Charlson comorbidity indices (concordance indices less than 0.7). The Charlson Comorbidity Index was superior to Elixhauser, and a model with age and gender was superior to both indices. Conclusion Preoperative comorbidity from administrative data did not predict mortality for patients with a hip fracture treated by arthroplasty. This was true even if association on group level existed.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 585-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Cristofolini ◽  
Mateusz Juszczyk ◽  
Fulvia Taddei ◽  
Richard E. Field ◽  
Neil Rushton ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-79
Author(s):  
D. Testi ◽  
A. Cappello ◽  
F. Sgallari ◽  
M. Rumpf ◽  
F. Traina ◽  
...  

Femoral neck fractures are an important clinical, social, and economical issue. Much effort has been made to improve the accuracy of prediction of fracture risk. However, at present the DEXA standard clinical protocol achieves an accuracy of about 65% in retrospective studies. A new procedure for prediction was developed including not only bone mineral density but also geometric and femoral bone strength information. The retrospective clinical validation has shown an improved accuracy to 80% in classifying 200 patients. The procedure has been employed in efficient, repeatable, and easy to use software for evaluation of femoral neck fracture risk. The software characteristics make it suitable for use in daily clinical practice, providing a useful tool for the improvement of femoral neck fracture prediction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document