Precision insertion of percutaneous sacroiliac screws using a novel augmented reality-based navigation system: a pilot study

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 1941-1947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huixiang Wang ◽  
Fang Wang ◽  
Anthony Peng Yew Leong ◽  
Lu Xu ◽  
Xiaojun Chen ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideyuki Suenaga ◽  
Huy Hoang Tran ◽  
Hongen Liao ◽  
Ken Masamune ◽  
Takeyoshi Dohi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (22) ◽  
pp. 10756
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Setoguchi ◽  
Yoichiro Ogino ◽  
Riichi Ouchida ◽  
Akira Takahashi ◽  
Yasunori Ayukawa ◽  
...  

The published article [...]


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (14) ◽  
pp. 6593
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Setoguchi ◽  
Yoichiro Ogino ◽  
Riichi Ouchida ◽  
Akira Takahashi ◽  
Yasunori Ayukawa ◽  
...  

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the accuracy of a newly developed dynamic navigation system and to compare the accuracy between flapless and open-flap surgery, and between surgeons. The subjects were patients who were scheduled to receive implants of the same size using the newly developed dynamic navigation system. The study’s procedures included cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) filming with fiducials, virtual planning of implant placement and the use of motion tracking technology for calibration and practical implant placement. The accuracy was evaluated using preoperative (virtual implant) and postoperative (actual implant) CBCT images based on angular, apical, coronal and vertical deviations. The differences of deviations between flapless and open-flap surgery, and between two surgeons, were statistically compared. In total, 66 implants were placed in 39 patients. The median and interquartile range of angular, apical, coronal and vertical deviations were 3.07° (2.52–3.54°), 0.96 mm (0.75–1.42 mm), 0.76 mm (0.57–1.37 mm) and 0.71 mm (0.61–0.88 mm), respectively. These deviations were similar to those found in previous studies. Flapless surgery resulted in a more accurate placement with respect to apical and coronal deviations, and the differences between the two surgeons were limited. The newly developed dynamic navigation system is considered to be eligible for clinical use.


Author(s):  
Sachiyuki Tsukada ◽  
Hiroyuki Ogawa ◽  
Masahiro Nishino ◽  
Kenji Kurosaka ◽  
Naoyuki Hirasawa

Abstract Background This pilot study was performed to examine the accuracy of the AR-KNEE system, an imageless navigation system using augmented reality (AR) technology for total knee arthroplasty. The AR-KNEE system enables the surgeon to view information from the navigation superimposed on the surgical field on a smartphone screen in real time. Methods Using the AR-KNEE system, one surgeon resected 10 tibial sawbones with viewing the tibial axis and aiming varus/valgus, posterior slope, internal/external rotation angles, and resection level superimposed on the surgical field. We performed computed tomography of the resected sawbones and measured the varus/valgus, posterior slope, and internal/external rotation angles using a designated computer software. The thickness of the resected bone was measured using digital calipers. Results The absolute differences between the values displayed on the smartphone screen and the measurement values for varus/valgus, posterior slope, internal/external rotation angles, and thickness of the resected bone were 0.5° ± 0.2°, 0.8° ± 0.9°, 1.8° ± 1.5°, and 0.6 mm ± 0.7 mm, respectively. Conclusions This pilot study using sawbones suggested that the AR-KNEE system may provide reliable accuracy for coronal, sagittal, and rotational alignment in tibial bone resection during total knee arthroplasty.


2011 ◽  
Vol 131 (7) ◽  
pp. 897-906
Author(s):  
Kengo Akaho ◽  
Takashi Nakagawa ◽  
Yoshihisa Yamaguchi ◽  
Katsuya Kawai ◽  
Hirokazu Kato ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faiella Eliodoro ◽  
Pacella Giuseppina ◽  
Altomare Carlo ◽  
Andresciani Flavio ◽  
Zobel Beomonte Bruno ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 2315
Author(s):  
Yu-Cheng Lo ◽  
Guan-An Chen ◽  
Yin Chun Liu ◽  
Yuan-Hou Chen ◽  
Jui-Ting Hsu ◽  
...  

To improve the accuracy of bracket placement in vivo, a protocol and device were introduced, which consisted of operative procedures for accurate control, a computer-aided design, and an augmented reality–assisted bracket navigation system. The present study evaluated the accuracy of this protocol. Methods: Thirty-one incisor teeth were tested from four participators. The teeth were bonded by novice and expert orthodontists. Compared with the control group by Boone gauge and the experiment group by augmented reality-assisted bracket navigation system, our study used for brackets measurement. To evaluate the accuracy, deviations of positions for bracket placement were measured. Results: The augmented reality-assisted bracket navigation system and control group were used in the same 31 cases. The priority of bonding brackets between control group or experiment group was decided by tossing coins, and then the teeth were debonded and the other technique was used. The medium vertical (incisogingival) position deviation in the control and AR groups by the novice orthodontist was 0.90 ± 0.06 mm and 0.51 ± 0.24 mm, respectively (p < 0.05), and by the expert orthodontist was 0.40 ± 0.29 mm and 0.29 ± 0.08 mm, respectively (p < 0.05). No significant changes in the horizontal position deviation were noted regardless of the orthodontist experience or use of the augmented reality–assisted bracket navigation system. Conclusion: The augmented reality–assisted bracket navigation system increased the accuracy rate by the expert orthodontist in the incisogingival direction and helped the novice orthodontist guide the bracket position within an acceptable clinical error of approximately 0.5 mm.


2021 ◽  
pp. 103841
Author(s):  
Hisham Iqbal ◽  
Fabio Tatti ◽  
Ferdinando Rodriguez y Baena

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document