Social influences on body size and developmental time in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris

2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (10) ◽  
pp. 1601-1612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagai Shpigler ◽  
Matan Tamarkin ◽  
Yael Gruber ◽  
Maayan Poleg ◽  
Adam J. Siegel ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Kent M. Daane ◽  
Xingeng Wang ◽  
Brian N. Hogg ◽  
Antonio Biondi

AbstractAsobara japonica (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), Ganaspis brasiliensis and Leptopilina japonica (Hymenoptera: Figitidae) are Asian larval parasitoids of spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). This study evaluated these parasitoids’ capacity to attack and develop from 24 non-target drosophilid species. Results showed that all three parasitoids were able to parasitize host larvae of multiple non-target species in artificial diet; A. japonica developed from 19 tested host species, regardless of the phylogenetic position of the host species, L. japonica developed from 11 tested species; and G. brasiliensis developed from only four of the exposed species. Success rate of parasitism (i.e., the probability that an adult wasp successfully emerged from a parasitized host) by the two figitid parasitoids was low in hosts other than the three species in the melanogaster group (D. melanogaster, D. simulans, and D. suzukii). The failure of the figitids to develop in most of the tested host species appears to correspond with more frequent encapsulation of the parasitoids by the hosts. The results indicate that G. brasiliensis is the most host specific to D. suzukii, L. japonica attacks mainly species in the melanogaster group and A. japonica is a generalist, at least physiologically. Overall, the developmental time of the parasitoids increased with the host’s developmental time. The body size of female A. japonica (as a model species) was positively related to host size, and mature egg load of female wasps increased with female body size. We discuss the use of these parasitoids for classical biological control of D. suzukii.


2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 582-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. U. Gerloff ◽  
B. K. Ottmer ◽  
P. Schmid-Hempel

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob G. Holland ◽  
Shinnosuke Nakayama ◽  
Maurizio Porfiri ◽  
Oded Nov ◽  
Guy Bloch

ABSTRACTSpecialization and plasticity are important for many forms of collective behavior, but the interplay between these factors is little understood. In insect societies, workers are often predisposed to specialize in different tasks, sometimes with morphological or physiological adaptations, facilitating a division of labor. Workers may also plastically switch between tasks or vary their effort. The degree to which predisposed specialization limits plasticity is not clear and has not been systematically tested in ecologically relevant contexts. We addressed this question in 20 freely-foraging bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) colonies by continually manipulating colonies to contain either a typically diverse or reduced (“homogeneous”) worker body size distribution, over two trials. Pooling both trials, diverse colonies did better in several indices of colony performance. The importance of body size was further demonstrated by the finding that foragers were larger than nurses even in homogeneous colonies with a very narrow body size range. However, the overall effect of size diversity stemmed mostly from one trial. In the other trial, homogeneous and diverse colonies showed comparable performance. By comparing behavioral profiles based on several thousand observations, we found evidence that workers in homogeneous colonies in this trial rescued colony performance by plastically increasing behavioral specialization and/or individual effort, compared to same-sized individuals in diverse colonies. Our results are consistent with a benefit to colonies of predisposed (size-diverse) specialists under certain conditions, but also suggest that plasticity or effort, can compensate for reduced (size-related) specialization. Thus, we suggest that an intricate interplay between specialization and plasticity is functionally adaptive in bumble bee colonies.


1970 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 447-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
MR Amin ◽  
YJ Kwon

Bombus terrestris L. appears to be a promising and cosmopolitan bumblebee species for pollination of greenhouse crops and its demand for large scale rearing. For effective crop pollination, colonies with optimal body sized workers are essential because generally larger bees visit more flowers per unit time. The body size is correlated with flexible development and growth in a changing environment. This study explored the effect of different photoperiodic regimes i.e., L0:D24, L8:D16, L16:D8 and L24:D0 in regulation of the body mass and size of bumblebee workers during the stages of larval, pupal and adult eclosion. The results showed that wet masses of larvae, pupae and adult ranged from 144.2 ± 7.6 to 198.7 ± 11.7, 398.3 ± 16.0 to 464.7 ± 9.3 and 224.8 ± 9.3 to 274.7 ± 7.0 mg, respectively whereas their dry masses were 47.7 ± 4.8 to 63.7 ± 5.4, 176.7 ± 6.7 to 204.7 ± 5.6 and 62.8 ± 3.0 to 78.7 ± 2.1 mg, respectively. The length of wing and tibae were observed 8.14 ± 0.82 to 8.47 ± 0.73 and 4.30 ± 0.51 to 4.47 ± 0.32 mm, respectively. The L0:D24 photoperiodic condition produced heavier larvae, pupae and adult workers with larger wings and tibiae and worker's body size and mass decreased significantly when the bees were reared under L16:D8 and L24:D0 conditions. Key words: Bumblebee; Body mass and size; Photoperiod DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjsir.v46i4.9589 BJSIR 2011; 46(4): 447-450


Insects ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Almut Kelber ◽  
Hema Somanathan

The family Apidae, which is amongst the largest bee families, are important pollinators globally and have been well studied for their visual adaptations and visually guided behaviors. This review is a synthesis of what is known about their eyes and visual capabilities. There are many species-specific differences, however, the relationship between body size, eye size, resolution, and sensitivity shows common patterns. Salient differences between castes and sexes are evident in important visually guided behaviors such as nest defense and mate search. We highlight that Apis mellifera and Bombus terrestris are popular bee models employed in the majority of studies that have contributed immensely to our understanding vision in bees. However, other species, specifically the tropical and many non-social Apidae, merit further investigation for a better understanding of the influence of ecological conditions on the evolution of bee vision.


2012 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Guillermo Jiménez-Cortés ◽  
Martín Alejandro Serrano-Meneses ◽  
Alex Córdoba-Aguilar

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 331-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teruyoshi Nagamitsu ◽  
Tanaka Kenta ◽  
Naoki Inari ◽  
Etsushi Kato ◽  
Tsutom Hiura

Insects ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 236
Author(s):  
Jacob Holland ◽  
Shinnosuke Nakayama ◽  
Maurizio Porfiri ◽  
Oded Nov ◽  
Guy Bloch

Specialisation and plasticity are important for many forms of collective behaviour, but the interplay between these factors is little understood. In insect societies, workers are often developmentally primed to specialise in different tasks, sometimes with morphological or physiological adaptations, facilitating a division of labour. Workers may also plastically switch between tasks or vary their effort. The degree to which developmentally primed specialisation limits plasticity is not clear and has not been systematically tested in ecologically relevant contexts. We addressed this question in 20 free-foraging bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) colonies by continually manipulating colonies to contain either a typically diverse, or a reduced (“homogeneous”), worker body size distribution while keeping the same mean body size, over two trials. Pooling both trials, diverse colonies produced a larger comb mass, an index of colony performance. The link between body size and task was further corroborated by the finding that foragers were larger than nurses even in homogeneous colonies with a very narrow body size range. However, the overall effect of size diversity stemmed mostly from one trial. In the other trial, homogeneous and diverse colonies showed comparable performance. By comparing behavioural profiles based on several thousand observations of individuals, we found evidence that workers in homogeneous colonies in this trial rescued colony performance by plastically increasing behavioural specialisation and/or individual effort, compared to same-sized individuals in diverse colonies. Our results are consistent with a benefit to colonies of large and small specialists under certain conditions, but also suggest that plasticity or effort can compensate for reduced (size-related) specialisation. Thus, we suggest that an intricate interplay between specialisation and plasticity is functionally adaptive in bumble bee colonies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document