Female ornamentation, incubation behavior, and reproductive success in a wild bird

2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Conor C. Taff ◽  
Corey R. Freeman-Gallant
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 1127-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin R. Eastwood ◽  
Michelle L. Hall ◽  
Niki Teunissen ◽  
Sjouke A. Kingma ◽  
Nataly Hidalgo Aranzamendi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (17) ◽  
pp. 3196-3216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esteban Botero‐Delgadillo ◽  
Carol Gilsenan ◽  
Jakob C. Mueller ◽  
Bart Kempenaers

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 1062-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marwa M Kavelaars ◽  
Luc Lens ◽  
Wendt Müller

Abstract In species with biparental care, individuals only have to pay the costs for their own parental investment, whereas the contribution of their partner comes for free. Each parent hence benefits if its partner works harder, creating an evolutionary conflict of interest. How parents resolve this conflict and how they achieve the optimal division of parental tasks often remains elusive. In this study, we investigated whether lesser black-backed gulls (Larus fuscus) divide parental care during incubation equally and whether this correlates with the extent of vocalizations between pair-members during incubation. We then investigated whether pairs showing more evenly distributed incubation behavior had a higher reproductive success. To this end, we recorded incubation behavior and vocalizations for 24-h time periods. Subsequently, we experimentally increased or decreased brood sizes in order to manipulate parental effort, and followed offspring development from hatching till fledging. Although incubation bouts were, on average, slightly longer in females, patterns varied strongly between pairs, ranging from primarily female incubation over equal sex contributions to male-biased incubation. Pairs contributing more equally to incubation vocalized more during nest relief and had a higher reproductive output when brood sizes were experimentally increased. Thus, vocalizations and a more equal division of parental care during incubation may facilitate higher levels of care during the nestling period, as suggested by a greater reproductive success when facing high brood demand, or they indicate pair quality.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1498-1502.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachael C. Shaw ◽  
Regan D. MacKinlay ◽  
Nicola S. Clayton ◽  
Kevin C. Burns

2015 ◽  
Vol 282 (1806) ◽  
pp. 20143026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasun B. Ekanayake ◽  
Michael A. Weston ◽  
Dale G. Nimmo ◽  
Grainne S. Maguire ◽  
John A. Endler ◽  
...  

Ornamentation of parents poses a high risk for offspring because it reduces cryptic nest defence. Over a century ago, Wallace proposed that sexual dichromatism enhances crypsis of open-nesting females although subsequent studies found that dichromatism per se is not necessarily adaptive. We tested whether reduced female ornamentation in a sexually dichromatic species reduces the risk of clutch depredation and leads to adaptive parental roles in the red-capped plover Charadrius ruficapillus, a species with biparental incubation. Males had significantly brighter and redder head coloration than females. During daytime, when visually foraging predators are active, colour-matched model males incurred a higher risk of clutch depredation than females, whereas at night there was no difference in depredation risk between sexes. In turn, red-capped plovers maintained a strongly diurnal/nocturnal division of parental care during incubation, with males attending the nest largely at night when visual predators were inactive and females incubating during the day. We found support for Wallace's conclusion that reduced female ornamentation provides a selective advantage when reproductive success is threatened by visually foraging predators. We conclude that predators may alter their prey's parental care patterns and therefore may affect parental cooperation during care.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (16) ◽  
pp. 2773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachael C. Shaw ◽  
Regan D. MacKinlay ◽  
Nicola S. Clayton ◽  
Kevin C. Burns

2013 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laure Cauchard ◽  
Neeltje J. Boogert ◽  
Louis Lefebvre ◽  
Frédérique Dubois ◽  
Blandine Doligez

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document