Correction of Tear Trough Deformity Using Autologous Fibroblast Combined with Keratin: New Soft Tissue Filler

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenshan Xing ◽  
Chen Zhang ◽  
Jiao Zhang ◽  
Qingguo Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Tear Trough ◽  
Tear Trough Deformity ◽  
Soft Tissue Filler

Dermal Fillers for Tear Trough Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lily N. Trinh ◽  
Sarah E. Grond ◽  
Amar Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Dermal Filler ◽  
Injection Technique ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Topical Anesthetic ◽  
Tear Trough ◽  
Tear Trough Deformity ◽  
Mesh Terms

AbstractThere is significant variation in treatment parameters when treating the infraorbital region. Thorough knowledge of these pertinent factors, choice of the optimal filling material, and proper understanding of the anatomy of this unforgiving region will contribute to a safe, effective, and natural result. We aim to conduct a systematic review of published literature related to soft tissue fillers of the tear trough and infraorbital region. A search of published literature was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and included PubMed, Embase, and Science Direct databases. The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms used were “tear trough” OR “infraorbital” AND “dermal filler” OR “hyaluronic acid” OR “poly-L-lactic acid” OR “calcium hydroxyapatite” OR “Restylane” OR “Radiesse” OR “Perlane” OR “Juvéderm” OR “Belotero.” Different combinations of these key terms were used. The initial search identified 526 articles. Six additional articles were identified through references. Two-hundred twenty-five duplicates were removed. A total of 307 studies were screened by title and abstract and 258 studies were eliminated based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Forty-nine articles underwent full-text review. The final analysis included 23 articles. Patient satisfaction was high, and duration of effect ranged from 8 to 12 months. Restylane was most commonly used. Injection technique varied, but generally involved placing filler pre-periosteally, deep to orbicularis oculi muscle, anterior to the inferior orbital rim via serial puncture or retrograde linear threading with a 30-gauge needle. Topical anesthetic was most commonly used. Side effects were generally mild and included bruising, edema, blue–gray dyschromia, and contour irregularities. Nonsurgical correction of the tear trough deformity with soft tissue filler is a minimally invasive procedure with excellent patient satisfaction with long-lasting effects. It is essential to have a fundamental understanding of the relevant anatomy and ideal injection technique to provide excellent patient outcomes and prevent serious complications.

Facial Soft Tissue Augmentation With Bellafill: A Review of 4 Years of Clinical Experience in 212 Patients

2020 ◽  
pp. 229255032093367
Author(s):  
Philip Solomon ◽  
Chew Lip Ng ◽  
Jaimie Kerzner ◽  
Richard Rival
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Soft Tissue Augmentation ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Lower Lip ◽  
Tear Trough ◽  
Acne Scars ◽  
Soft Tissue Filler

Introduction: Bellafill (Suneva Medical Inc) is a semipermanent injectable soft tissue filler composed of smooth and uniform polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) microspheres suspended in a bovine collagen gel. It is a third generation PMMA filler, with more uniform shapes and sizes of the PMMA microspheres, which has been purported to decrease the incidence of granuloma formation. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of our clinical experience from 2014 to 2017 with Bellafill as a soft tissue injectable filler in the following clinical scenarios: deep nasolabial folds, depressed facial acne scars, malar volume loss, temporal wasting, tear trough deformity, chin augmentation, angle of jaw augmentation, and lip augmentation. The primary outcome is the rate of adverse events, and the secondary outcome is subjective patient satisfaction. Results: From 2014 to 2017, 842 syringes of Bellafill were administered to 212 patients, for a total of 417 procedures. Of the 417 procedures, 96 (23.0%) were for acne scars, 82 (19.7%) malar volume restorations, 65 (15.6%) nasolabial fold augmentations, 45 (10.8%) chin augmentations, 42 (10.1%) tear trough volume restorations, 28 (6.7%) temple volume restorations, 25 (6.0%) rhinoplasty touch-ups for small areas of nasal depression, 22 (5.3%) lip augmentations, and 12 (2.9%) jaw angle augmentations were performed. A range of 1 to 12 syringes were injected into each patient, over 1 to 3 sessions; 6 cases of adverse events occurred (1.4%). There were 4 cases of solitary nodules in the injection site, 1 case of lower eyelid oedema which persisted for 3 months and 1 case of lower lip oedema which resolved within hours. Patient satisfaction rates ranged from 83.3% for angle of jaw augmentation to 99.0% for improvement of acne scars. Conclusion: Bellafill is a safe and effective option for a semipermanent soft tissue filler, with high patient satisfaction and a good safety profile.

scholarly journals Neurotoxin and soft tissue filler for influencing gender perception in transgender individuals: a pilot prospective survey-based study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Meshkov Bonati ◽  
Kathleen Petrell ◽  
Jennifer MacGregor ◽  
Prasanthi Kandula ◽  
Jeffrey S. Dover ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Prospective Survey ◽  
Gender Perception ◽  
Soft Tissue Filler

Quantitative Analysis of the Lifting Effect of Facial Soft-Tissue Filler Injections

2021 ◽  
Vol 147 (5) ◽  
pp. 765e-776e
Author(s):  
Rami Haidar ◽  
David L. Freytag, M.D. ◽  
Konstantin Frank ◽  
Christina Rudolph ◽  
Hassan Hamade, B.Sc. ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Facial Soft Tissue ◽  
Filler Injections ◽  
Soft Tissue Filler

Adjuncts to Facial Rejuvenation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather R. Faulkner
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Facial Rejuvenation ◽  
Dermal Filler ◽  
Nasolabial Fold ◽  
High Quality ◽  
The Past ◽  
Appropriate Treatment ◽  
Soft Tissue Filler ◽  
Facial Anatomy ◽  
Filler Complications

The preferred methods for facial rejuvenation have been changing over the past decade, with operative procedures on the decline and minimally invasive, office-based procedures on the rise. As a result, it is critical for plastic surgery practitioners to understand the intricacies of the use of neuromodulators and soft tissue fillers in this milieu. While these procedures are usually performed in an office, without general anesthesia, the risk of significant complications still exists. The knowledge of facial anatomy, techniques, and pitfalls is essential for achieving high quality, predictable, and reproducible results. Likewise, when a complication arises, prompt recognition and appropriate treatment is paramount. In this chapter, the history, purpose, technical guidelines, and complications of adjunctive techniques for facial rejuvenation are reviewed in detail. This review contains 2 tables, and 52 references. Keywords: facial rejuvenation, neuromodulator, soft tissue filler, botulinum toxin, dermal filler, aging face, facial rhytids, filler complications, glabellar lines, nasolabial fold 

The Application of Soft Tissue Filler in the Oral and Maxillofacial Field

2021 ◽  
pp. 367-387
Author(s):  
Young-Kyun Kim ◽  
Sang-Yun Kim ◽  
Han-Chang Yu
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Filler
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document