Upper Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis Risk Factors, Associated Morbidity and Mortality in Trauma Patients

Author(s):  
Mbaga Walusimbi ◽  
Avafia Y Dossa ◽  
Kiran Faryar ◽  
Ronald J Markert ◽  
Mary C McCarthy
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-32
Author(s):  
Camelia C. DIACONU ◽  
◽  
Mădălina ILIE ◽  
Mihaela Adela IANCU ◽  
◽  
...  

Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis is a condition with increasing prevalence, with high risk of morbidity and mortality, due to embolic complications. In the majority of the cases, thrombosis involves more than one venous segment, most frequently being affected the subclavian vein, followed by internal jugular vein, brachiocephalic vein and basilic vein. Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in patients without risk factors for thrombosis is called primary deep venous thrombosis and includes idiopathic thrombosis and effort thrombosis. Deep venous thrombosis of upper extremity is called secondary when there are known risk factors and it is encountered mainly in older patients, with many comorbidities. The positive diagnosis is established only after paraclinical and imaging investigations, ultrasonography being the most useful diagnostic method. The most important complication, with high risk of death, is pulmonary embolism. Treatment consists in anticoagulant therapy, for preventing thrombosis extension and pulmonary embolism.


Surgery Today ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiki Takemoto ◽  
Junichi Soh ◽  
Shuta Ohara ◽  
Toshio Fujino ◽  
Takamasa Koga ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 853-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil Hingorani ◽  
Enrico Ascher ◽  
Elke Lorenson ◽  
Patrick DePippo ◽  
Sergio Salles-Cunha ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (11) ◽  
pp. 2471-2478 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. BLOM ◽  
C. J. M. DOGGEN ◽  
S. OSANTO ◽  
F. R. ROSENDAAL

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18190-e18190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Poh ◽  
Ann Brunson ◽  
Anjlee Mahajan ◽  
Theresa Keegan ◽  
Ted Wun

e18190 Background: Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UE DVT) is a known complication in patients with cancer. However, the cumulative incidence by cancer type, risk factors associated with UE DVT and impact on survival is not well-described. Methods: Using the California Cancer Registry , we identified patients with 10 common malignancies (2005-2014) and linked this to the California hospitalization and emergency department databases to find patients with an incident UE DVT event using specific ICD-9-CM codes. We determined cumulative incidence of UE DVT adjusted for the competing risk of death. Using Cox proportional hazards regression, stratified by tumor type and adjusted for other prognostic covariates including central venous catheters (CVC), we identified risk factors for developing UE DVT and the impact of UE DVT on overall survival. Patients with venous thromboembolism prior to malignancy diagnosis were excluded. Results: Among 785,444 patients with malignancy, 6,099 (0.8%) had an incident UE DVT. The 24-month cumulative incidence of UE DVT varied by cancer type (Table). Most UE DVT (62.2%) occurred in patients with CVC. VTE after cancer diagnosis and CVC substantially increased the risk for UE DVT across all cancers. UE DVT was also associated with worse overall survival for all malignancies with hazard ratios ranging from 1.52 to 3.72. Conclusions: UE DVT is a rare but important complication among patients with malignancy, with incidence highest in leukemia and lowest in prostate cancer. Although uncommon, UE DVT may affect prognosis in patients with malignancy as it is associated with an increased hazard of death. Table: 24-month cumulative incidence of UE DVT, adjusted for the competing risk of death, in 10 common malignancies among California cancer patients, 2005-2014. [Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 837-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-lei Yi ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Jia Li ◽  
Liang Feng ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document